In gb_operation_response_send, get an extra reference
before gb_message_send() with this comment "/* Reference will
be dropped when message has been sent. */". Therefore, we
should drop the got reference not only in the error branch,
but also in the complete branch.
Signed-off-by: Lv Yunlong <[email protected]>
---
drivers/greybus/operation.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/greybus/operation.c b/drivers/greybus/operation.c
index 296f0b93d171..500b3fe53a04 100644
--- a/drivers/greybus/operation.c
+++ b/drivers/greybus/operation.c
@@ -855,7 +855,7 @@ static int gb_operation_response_send(struct gb_operation *operation,
if (ret)
goto err_put_active;
- /*Drop reference after message send successfully. */
+ /*Drop reference after message send completes. */
gb_operation_put_active(operation);
gb_operation_put(operation);
--
2.25.1
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 01:10:14AM -0800, Lv Yunlong wrote:
> In gb_operation_response_send, get an extra reference
> before gb_message_send() with this comment "/* Reference will
> be dropped when message has been sent. */". Therefore, we
> should drop the got reference not only in the error branch,
> but also in the complete branch.
That's not what your patch does at all :(
Sorry, i mistakenly divided the patch into two commits. What i have sent
is the latest commit which corrected my grammar in the patch.
I will send the full patch soon.
> -----原始邮件-----
> 发件人: "Greg KH" <[email protected]>
> 发送时间: 2021-03-10 17:32:40 (星期三)
> 收件人: "Lv Yunlong" <[email protected]>
> 抄送: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
> 主题: Re: [PATCH] greybus/operation: Drop reference when message has been set
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 01:10:14AM -0800, Lv Yunlong wrote:
> > In gb_operation_response_send, get an extra reference
> > before gb_message_send() with this comment "/* Reference will
> > be dropped when message has been sent. */". Therefore, we
> > should drop the got reference not only in the error branch,
> > but also in the complete branch.
>
> That's not what your patch does at all :(
>