2021-03-19 12:23:08

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 00/13] 5.10.25-rc1 review

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.25 release.
There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Mar 2021 12:17:37 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.25-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Linux 5.10.25-rc1

Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
net: dsa: b53: Support setting learning on port

Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
ALSA: usb-audio: Don't avoid stopping the stream at disconnection

J. Bruce Fields <[email protected]>
Revert "nfsd4: a client's own opens needn't prevent delegations"

J. Bruce Fields <[email protected]>
Revert "nfsd4: remove check_conflicting_opens warning"

Amir Goldstein <[email protected]>
fuse: fix live lock in fuse_iget()

Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin <[email protected]>
RDMA/srp: Fix support for unpopulated and unbalanced NUMA nodes

Piotr Krysiuk <[email protected]>
bpf, selftests: Fix up some test_verifier cases for unprivileged

Piotr Krysiuk <[email protected]>
bpf: Add sanity check for upper ptr_limit

Piotr Krysiuk <[email protected]>
bpf: Simplify alu_limit masking for pointer arithmetic

Piotr Krysiuk <[email protected]>
bpf: Fix off-by-one for area size in creating mask to left

Piotr Krysiuk <[email protected]>
bpf: Prohibit alu ops for pointer types not defining ptr_limit

Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
crypto: x86/aes-ni-xts - use direct calls to and 4-way stride

Uros Bizjak <[email protected]>
crypto: aesni - Use TEST %reg,%reg instead of CMP $0,%reg


-------------

Diffstat:

Makefile | 4 +-
arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_asm.S | 133 ++++++++++++---------
arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_avx-x86_64.S | 20 ++--
arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c | 25 ++--
drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c | 110 +++++++----------
drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c | 18 +++
drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_regs.h | 1 +
drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c | 15 +--
fs/fuse/fuse_i.h | 1 +
fs/locks.c | 3 -
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 53 +++-----
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 33 +++--
sound/usb/endpoint.c | 3 -
sound/usb/pcm.c | 5 +-
.../selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds_deduction.c | 27 +++--
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c | 4 +
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c | 15 ++-
.../selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c | 23 +++-
18 files changed, 266 insertions(+), 227 deletions(-)



2021-03-19 12:24:35

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 10/13] Revert "nfsd4: remove check_conflicting_opens warning"

From: J. Bruce Fields <[email protected]>

commit 4aa5e002034f0701c3335379fd6c22d7f3338cce upstream.

This reverts commit 50747dd5e47b "nfsd4: remove check_conflicting_opens
warning", as a prerequisite for reverting 94415b06eb8a, which has a
serious bug.

Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -4957,6 +4957,7 @@ static int nfsd4_check_conflicting_opens
writes--;
if (fp->fi_fds[O_RDWR])
writes--;
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(writes < 0);
if (writes > 0)
return -EAGAIN;
spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock);


2021-03-19 12:24:40

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 11/13] Revert "nfsd4: a clients own opens neednt prevent delegations"

From: J. Bruce Fields <[email protected]>

commit 6ee65a773096ab3f39d9b00311ac983be5bdeb7c upstream.

This reverts commit 94415b06eb8aed13481646026dc995f04a3a534a.

That commit claimed to allow a client to get a read delegation when it
was the only writer. Actually it allowed a client to get a read
delegation when *any* client has a write open!

The main problem is that it's depending on nfs4_clnt_odstate structures
that are actually only maintained for pnfs exports.

This causes clients to miss writes performed by other clients, even when
there have been intervening closes and opens, violating close-to-open
cache consistency.

We can do this a different way, but first we should just revert this.

I've added pynfs 4.1 test DELEG19 to test for this, as I should have
done originally!

Cc: [email protected]
Reported-by: Timo Rothenpieler <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
fs/locks.c | 3 --
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 54 +++++++++++++---------------------------------------
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -1808,9 +1808,6 @@ check_conflicting_open(struct file *filp

if (flags & FL_LAYOUT)
return 0;
- if (flags & FL_DELEG)
- /* We leave these checks to the caller. */
- return 0;

if (arg == F_RDLCK)
return inode_is_open_for_write(inode) ? -EAGAIN : 0;
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -4945,32 +4945,6 @@ static struct file_lock *nfs4_alloc_init
return fl;
}

-static int nfsd4_check_conflicting_opens(struct nfs4_client *clp,
- struct nfs4_file *fp)
-{
- struct nfs4_clnt_odstate *co;
- struct file *f = fp->fi_deleg_file->nf_file;
- struct inode *ino = locks_inode(f);
- int writes = atomic_read(&ino->i_writecount);
-
- if (fp->fi_fds[O_WRONLY])
- writes--;
- if (fp->fi_fds[O_RDWR])
- writes--;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(writes < 0);
- if (writes > 0)
- return -EAGAIN;
- spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock);
- list_for_each_entry(co, &fp->fi_clnt_odstate, co_perfile) {
- if (co->co_client != clp) {
- spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock);
- return -EAGAIN;
- }
- }
- spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock);
- return 0;
-}
-
static struct nfs4_delegation *
nfs4_set_delegation(struct nfs4_client *clp, struct svc_fh *fh,
struct nfs4_file *fp, struct nfs4_clnt_odstate *odstate)
@@ -4990,12 +4964,9 @@ nfs4_set_delegation(struct nfs4_client *

nf = find_readable_file(fp);
if (!nf) {
- /*
- * We probably could attempt another open and get a read
- * delegation, but for now, don't bother until the
- * client actually sends us one.
- */
- return ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN);
+ /* We should always have a readable file here */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+ return ERR_PTR(-EBADF);
}
spin_lock(&state_lock);
spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock);
@@ -5025,19 +4996,11 @@ nfs4_set_delegation(struct nfs4_client *
if (!fl)
goto out_clnt_odstate;

- status = nfsd4_check_conflicting_opens(clp, fp);
- if (status) {
- locks_free_lock(fl);
- goto out_clnt_odstate;
- }
status = vfs_setlease(fp->fi_deleg_file->nf_file, fl->fl_type, &fl, NULL);
if (fl)
locks_free_lock(fl);
if (status)
goto out_clnt_odstate;
- status = nfsd4_check_conflicting_opens(clp, fp);
- if (status)
- goto out_clnt_odstate;

spin_lock(&state_lock);
spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock);
@@ -5119,6 +5082,17 @@ nfs4_open_delegation(struct svc_fh *fh,
goto out_no_deleg;
if (!cb_up || !(oo->oo_flags & NFS4_OO_CONFIRMED))
goto out_no_deleg;
+ /*
+ * Also, if the file was opened for write or
+ * create, there's a good chance the client's
+ * about to write to it, resulting in an
+ * immediate recall (since we don't support
+ * write delegations):
+ */
+ if (open->op_share_access & NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE)
+ goto out_no_deleg;
+ if (open->op_create == NFS4_OPEN_CREATE)
+ goto out_no_deleg;
break;
default:
goto out_no_deleg;


2021-03-19 12:24:46

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 12/13] ALSA: usb-audio: Dont avoid stopping the stream at disconnection

From: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>

commit 257d2d7e9e798305d65825cb82b0a7d1c0511e89 upstream

In the later patch, we're going to issue the PCM sync_stop calls at
disconnection. But currently the USB-audio driver can't handle it
because it has a check of shutdown flag for stopping the URBs. This
is basically superfluous (the stopping URBs are safe at disconnection
state), so let's drop the check.

Fixes: dc5eafe7787c ("ALSA: usb-audio: Support PCM sync_stop")
Cc: <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
[sudip: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
sound/usb/endpoint.c | 3 ---
sound/usb/pcm.c | 5 +----
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/sound/usb/endpoint.c
+++ b/sound/usb/endpoint.c
@@ -576,9 +576,6 @@ static int deactivate_urbs(struct snd_us
{
unsigned int i;

- if (!force && atomic_read(&ep->chip->shutdown)) /* to be sure... */
- return -EBADFD;
-
clear_bit(EP_FLAG_RUNNING, &ep->flags);

INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ep->ready_playback_urbs);
--- a/sound/usb/pcm.c
+++ b/sound/usb/pcm.c
@@ -280,10 +280,7 @@ static int snd_usb_pcm_sync_stop(struct
{
struct snd_usb_substream *subs = substream->runtime->private_data;

- if (!snd_usb_lock_shutdown(subs->stream->chip)) {
- sync_pending_stops(subs);
- snd_usb_unlock_shutdown(subs->stream->chip);
- }
+ sync_pending_stops(subs);
return 0;
}



2021-03-19 12:24:52

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 03/13] bpf: Prohibit alu ops for pointer types not defining ptr_limit

From: Piotr Krysiuk <[email protected]>

commit f232326f6966cf2a1d1db7bc917a4ce5f9f55f76 upstream.

The purpose of this patch is to streamline error propagation and in particular
to propagate retrieve_ptr_limit() errors for pointer types that are not defining
a ptr_limit such that register-based alu ops against these types can be rejected.

The main rationale is that a gap has been identified by Piotr in the existing
protection against speculatively out-of-bounds loads, for example, in case of
ctx pointers, unprivileged programs can still perform pointer arithmetic. This
can be abused to execute speculatively out-of-bounds loads without restrictions
and thus extract contents of kernel memory.

Fix this by rejecting unprivileged programs that attempt any pointer arithmetic
on unprotected pointer types. The two affected ones are pointer to ctx as well
as pointer to map. Field access to a modified ctx' pointer is rejected at a
later point in time in the verifier, and 7c6967326267 ("bpf: Permit map_ptr
arithmetic with opcode add and offset 0") only relevant for root-only use cases.
Risk of unprivileged program breakage is considered very low.

Fixes: 7c6967326267 ("bpf: Permit map_ptr arithmetic with opcode add and offset 0")
Fixes: b2157399cc98 ("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation")
Signed-off-by: Piotr Krysiuk <[email protected]>
Co-developed-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 16 ++++++++++------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -5406,6 +5406,7 @@ static int sanitize_ptr_alu(struct bpf_v
u32 alu_state, alu_limit;
struct bpf_reg_state tmp;
bool ret;
+ int err;

if (can_skip_alu_sanitation(env, insn))
return 0;
@@ -5421,10 +5422,13 @@ static int sanitize_ptr_alu(struct bpf_v
alu_state |= ptr_is_dst_reg ?
BPF_ALU_SANITIZE_SRC : BPF_ALU_SANITIZE_DST;

- if (retrieve_ptr_limit(ptr_reg, &alu_limit, opcode, off_is_neg))
- return 0;
- if (update_alu_sanitation_state(aux, alu_state, alu_limit))
- return -EACCES;
+ err = retrieve_ptr_limit(ptr_reg, &alu_limit, opcode, off_is_neg);
+ if (err < 0)
+ return err;
+
+ err = update_alu_sanitation_state(aux, alu_state, alu_limit);
+ if (err < 0)
+ return err;
do_sim:
/* Simulate and find potential out-of-bounds access under
* speculative execution from truncation as a result of
@@ -5540,7 +5544,7 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struc
case BPF_ADD:
ret = sanitize_ptr_alu(env, insn, ptr_reg, dst_reg, smin_val < 0);
if (ret < 0) {
- verbose(env, "R%d tried to add from different maps or paths\n", dst);
+ verbose(env, "R%d tried to add from different maps, paths, or prohibited types\n", dst);
return ret;
}
/* We can take a fixed offset as long as it doesn't overflow
@@ -5595,7 +5599,7 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struc
case BPF_SUB:
ret = sanitize_ptr_alu(env, insn, ptr_reg, dst_reg, smin_val < 0);
if (ret < 0) {
- verbose(env, "R%d tried to sub from different maps or paths\n", dst);
+ verbose(env, "R%d tried to sub from different maps, paths, or prohibited types\n", dst);
return ret;
}
if (dst_reg == off_reg) {


2021-03-19 12:24:55

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 05/13] bpf: Simplify alu_limit masking for pointer arithmetic

From: Piotr Krysiuk <[email protected]>

commit b5871dca250cd391885218b99cc015aca1a51aea upstream.

Instead of having the mov32 with aux->alu_limit - 1 immediate, move this
operation to retrieve_ptr_limit() instead to simplify the logic and to
allow for subsequent sanity boundary checks inside retrieve_ptr_limit().
This avoids in future that at the time of the verifier masking rewrite
we'd run into an underflow which would not sign extend due to the nature
of mov32 instruction.

Signed-off-by: Piotr Krysiuk <[email protected]>
Co-developed-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -5342,16 +5342,16 @@ static int retrieve_ptr_limit(const stru
*/
off = ptr_reg->off + ptr_reg->var_off.value;
if (mask_to_left)
- *ptr_limit = MAX_BPF_STACK + off + 1;
+ *ptr_limit = MAX_BPF_STACK + off;
else
- *ptr_limit = -off;
+ *ptr_limit = -off - 1;
return 0;
case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE:
if (mask_to_left) {
- *ptr_limit = ptr_reg->umax_value + ptr_reg->off + 1;
+ *ptr_limit = ptr_reg->umax_value + ptr_reg->off;
} else {
off = ptr_reg->smin_value + ptr_reg->off;
- *ptr_limit = ptr_reg->map_ptr->value_size - off;
+ *ptr_limit = ptr_reg->map_ptr->value_size - off - 1;
}
return 0;
default:
@@ -10946,7 +10946,7 @@ static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_ve
off_reg = issrc ? insn->src_reg : insn->dst_reg;
if (isneg)
*patch++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MUL, off_reg, -1);
- *patch++ = BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_AX, aux->alu_limit - 1);
+ *patch++ = BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_AX, aux->alu_limit);
*patch++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_AX, off_reg);
*patch++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_AX, off_reg);
*patch++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_NEG, BPF_REG_AX, 0);


2021-03-19 19:20:25

by Pavel Machek

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/13] 5.10.25-rc1 review

Hi!

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.25 release.
> There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

CIP testing did not find any problems here:

https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y

Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <[email protected]>

Best regards,
Pavel

--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany


Attachments:
(No filename) (670.00 B)
signature.asc (188.00 B)
Digital signature
Download all attachments

2021-03-19 19:55:53

by Naresh Kamboju

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/13] 5.10.25-rc1 review

On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 at 17:51, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.25 release.
> There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Mar 2021 12:17:37 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.25-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email protected]>

Summary
------------------------------------------------------------------------

kernel: 5.10.25-rc1
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-5.10.y
git commit: b05da84e91a81ee89c814d51c18cc6f5b077256a
git describe: v5.10.24-14-gb05da84e91a8
Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.24-14-gb05da84e91a8

No regressions (compared to build v5.10.24)

No fixes (compared to build v5.10.24)

Ran 57572 total tests in the following environments and test suites.

Environments
--------------
- arc
- arm
- arm64
- dragonboard-410c
- hi6220-hikey
- i386
- juno-r2
- juno-r2-compat
- juno-r2-kasan
- mips
- parisc
- powerpc
- qemu-arm-clang
- qemu-arm-debug
- qemu-arm64-clang
- qemu-arm64-debug
- qemu-arm64-kasan
- qemu-i386-clang
- qemu-i386-debug
- qemu-x86_64-clang
- qemu-x86_64-debug
- qemu-x86_64-kasan
- qemu-x86_64-kcsan
- qemu_arm
- qemu_arm64
- qemu_arm64-compat
- qemu_i386
- qemu_x86_64
- qemu_x86_64-compat
- riscv
- s390
- sh
- sparc
- x15
- x86
- x86-kasan
- x86_64

Test Suites
-----------
* build
* linux-log-parser
* igt-gpu-tools
* install-android-platform-tools-r2600
* libhugetlbfs
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* kvm-unit-tests
* perf
* v4l2-compliance
* fwts
* kselftest-
* kselftest-lkdtm
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-x86
* rcutorture
* timesync-off

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

2021-03-19 20:08:44

by Florian Fainelli

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/13] 5.10.25-rc1 review



On 3/19/2021 5:18 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.25 release.
> There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Mar 2021 12:17:37 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.25-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
--
Florian

2021-03-19 21:24:46

by Guenter Roeck

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/13] 5.10.25-rc1 review

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 01:18:57PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.25 release.
> There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Mar 2021 12:17:37 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>

Build results:
total: 156 pass: 156 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 432 pass: 432 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>

Guenter

2021-03-20 11:50:59

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/13] 5.10.25-rc1 review

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 01:06:36PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
>
> On 3/19/2021 5:18 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.25 release.
> > There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Mar 2021 12:17:37 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.25-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
>
> Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>

thanks for testing 2 of these and letting me know.

greg k-h

2021-03-21 02:27:18

by Zou Wei

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/13] 5.10.25-rc1 review



On 2021/3/19 20:18, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.25 release.
> There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Mar 2021 12:17:37 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.25-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.10.25,

Kernel repo:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
Branch: linux-5.10.y
Version: 5.10.25
Commit: 3ba56f490c7ab26974806f8c2f14fc49652efe10
Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)

arm64:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 4721
passed: 4721
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------

x86:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 4721
passed: 4721
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Tested-by: Hulk Robot <[email protected]>