Greeting,
FYI, we noticed a 4.4% improvement of pigz.throughput due to commit:
commit: 83b62687a05205847d627f29126a8fee3c644335 ("workqueue/tracing: Copy workqueue name to buffer in trace event")
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
in testcase: pigz
on test machine: 272 threads Intel(R) Xeon Phi(TM) CPU 7255 @ 1.10GHz with 112G memory
with following parameters:
nr_threads: 100%
blocksize: 128K
cpufreq_governor: performance
ucode: 0x11
test-description: Pigz, which stands for parallel implementation of gzip, is a fully functional replacement for gzip that exploits multiple processors and multiple cores to the hilt when compressing data.
test-url: https://github.com/madler/pigz
Details are as below:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
To reproduce:
git clone https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git
cd lkp-tests
bin/lkp install job.yaml # job file is attached in this email
bin/lkp split-job --compatible job.yaml
bin/lkp run compatible-job.yaml
=========================================================================================
blocksize/compiler/cpufreq_governor/kconfig/nr_threads/rootfs/tbox_group/testcase/ucode:
128K/gcc-9/performance/x86_64-rhel-8.3/100%/debian-10.4-x86_64-20200603.cgz/lkp-knm02/pigz/0x11
commit:
v5.12-rc3
83b62687a0 ("workqueue/tracing: Copy workqueue name to buffer in trace event")
v5.12-rc3 83b62687a05205847d627f29126
---------------- ---------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev
\ | \
1.741e+08 +4.4% 1.819e+08 pigz.throughput
54919 +7.3% 58908 pigz.time.involuntary_context_switches
7148 +7.6% 7694 pigz.time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got
1123 +6.1% 1192 pigz.time.system_time
20411 +7.7% 21987 pigz.time.user_time
48911847 +3.4% 50584989 pigz.time.voluntary_context_switches
0.07 ?127% -61.7% 0.03 ? 8% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.exit_to_user_mode_prepare.irqentry_exit_to_user_mode.asm_sysvec_call_function_single.[unknown]
245.60 ? 3% -8.0% 225.96 ? 3% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.do_task_dead.do_exit.do_group_exit.__x64_sys_exit_group.do_syscall_64
65.33 -3.3% 63.17 vmstat.cpu.id
24.67 +8.8% 26.83 vmstat.cpu.us
324150 +3.3% 334914 vmstat.system.cs
119473 +1.4% 121106 proc-vmstat.nr_inactive_anon
119473 +1.4% 121106 proc-vmstat.nr_zone_inactive_anon
18244095 +4.2% 19001943 proc-vmstat.numa_hit
18244092 +4.2% 19001938 proc-vmstat.numa_local
18452852 +4.2% 19220893 proc-vmstat.pgalloc_normal
1833088 +1.3% 1856573 proc-vmstat.pgfault
18237066 +4.1% 18990820 proc-vmstat.pgfree
7.575e+09 +4.2% 7.894e+09 perf-stat.i.branch-instructions
6.963e+08 +4.2% 7.254e+08 perf-stat.i.branch-misses
12.17 +0.6 12.75 perf-stat.i.cache-miss-rate%
1.819e+08 ? 2% +9.8% 1.998e+08 perf-stat.i.cache-misses
1.494e+09 +4.7% 1.564e+09 perf-stat.i.cache-references
328598 +3.3% 339330 perf-stat.i.context-switches
2.30 +1.9% 2.34 perf-stat.i.cpi
1.164e+11 +6.3% 1.238e+11 perf-stat.i.cpu-cycles
2507 +5.4% 2643 perf-stat.i.cpu-migrations
643.68 -3.1% 623.43 perf-stat.i.cycles-between-cache-misses
0.17 -0.0 0.16 perf-stat.i.iTLB-load-miss-rate%
85061492 -3.2% 82321797 perf-stat.i.iTLB-load-misses
5.081e+10 +4.3% 5.3e+10 perf-stat.i.iTLB-loads
5.08e+10 +4.3% 5.299e+10 perf-stat.i.instructions
597.00 +7.8% 643.27 perf-stat.i.instructions-per-iTLB-miss
0.44 -1.9% 0.43 perf-stat.i.ipc
0.43 +6.3% 0.45 perf-stat.i.metric.GHz
219.96 +4.3% 229.42 perf-stat.i.metric.M/sec
5936 +1.5% 6023 perf-stat.i.minor-faults
5938 +1.5% 6025 perf-stat.i.page-faults
12.30 +0.6 12.88 perf-stat.overall.cache-miss-rate%
2.30 +1.9% 2.34 perf-stat.overall.cpi
634.61 -3.1% 614.78 perf-stat.overall.cycles-between-cache-misses
0.17 -0.0 0.16 perf-stat.overall.iTLB-load-miss-rate%
596.50 +7.8% 642.78 perf-stat.overall.instructions-per-iTLB-miss
0.44 -1.9% 0.43 perf-stat.overall.ipc
7.521e+09 +4.2% 7.84e+09 perf-stat.ps.branch-instructions
6.91e+08 +4.2% 7.201e+08 perf-stat.ps.branch-misses
1.825e+08 ? 2% +9.7% 2.003e+08 perf-stat.ps.cache-misses
1.484e+09 +4.7% 1.554e+09 perf-stat.ps.cache-references
325865 +3.4% 336821 perf-stat.ps.context-switches
1.158e+11 +6.3% 1.231e+11 perf-stat.ps.cpu-cycles
2495 +5.6% 2634 perf-stat.ps.cpu-migrations
84546657 -3.2% 81853659 perf-stat.ps.iTLB-load-misses
5.044e+10 +4.3% 5.262e+10 perf-stat.ps.iTLB-loads
5.043e+10 +4.3% 5.261e+10 perf-stat.ps.instructions
5954 +1.3% 6034 perf-stat.ps.minor-faults
5956 +1.3% 6036 perf-stat.ps.page-faults
1.519e+13 +4.3% 1.585e+13 perf-stat.total.instructions
54.63 -1.5 53.15 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.cpu_startup_entry.start_secondary.secondary_startup_64_no_verify
54.64 -1.5 53.15 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.start_secondary.secondary_startup_64_no_verify
54.52 -1.5 53.06 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_idle.cpu_startup_entry.start_secondary.secondary_startup_64_no_verify
54.81 -1.5 53.36 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.secondary_startup_64_no_verify
25.19 -1.1 24.09 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.cpuidle_enter_state.cpuidle_enter.do_idle
27.94 -1.0 26.96 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.cpuidle_enter_state.cpuidle_enter.do_idle.cpu_startup_entry
15.92 -0.6 15.29 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.hrtimer_interrupt.__sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.cpuidle_enter_state
17.00 -0.6 16.39 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.cpuidle_enter_state.cpuidle_enter
7.67 -0.4 7.26 ? 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.menu_select.do_idle.cpu_startup_entry.start_secondary.secondary_startup_64_no_verify
1.16 ? 23% -0.3 0.88 ? 4% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.update_rq_clock.scheduler_tick.update_process_times.tick_sched_handle.tick_sched_timer
3.46 -0.2 3.23 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.tick_nohz_get_sleep_length.menu_select.do_idle.cpu_startup_entry.start_secondary
1.55 ? 2% -0.2 1.37 ? 8% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.clockevents_program_event.hrtimer_interrupt.__sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt
2.17 ? 2% -0.2 1.99 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.tick_nohz_next_event.tick_nohz_get_sleep_length.menu_select.do_idle.cpu_startup_entry
14.78 ? 5% +1.0 15.81 ? 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.futex_wait_queue_me.futex_wait.do_futex.__x64_sys_futex.do_syscall_64
15.60 ? 5% +1.0 16.65 ? 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.futex_wait.do_futex.__x64_sys_futex.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
14.22 ? 5% +1.1 15.27 ? 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__schedule.schedule.futex_wait_queue_me.futex_wait.do_futex
14.30 ? 5% +1.1 15.38 ? 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.schedule.futex_wait_queue_me.futex_wait.do_futex.__x64_sys_futex
19.72 ? 3% +1.1 20.82 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_futex.__x64_sys_futex.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
19.85 ? 3% +1.1 20.96 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__x64_sys_futex.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
21.14 ? 3% +1.2 22.30 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
21.63 ? 3% +1.2 22.81 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
54.64 -1.5 53.15 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.start_secondary
54.81 -1.5 53.36 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.secondary_startup_64_no_verify
54.81 -1.5 53.36 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.cpu_startup_entry
54.80 -1.4 53.36 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.do_idle
7.74 -0.4 7.33 ? 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.menu_select
3.32 ? 4% -0.3 3.03 ? 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.ktime_get
3.50 -0.2 3.27 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.tick_nohz_get_sleep_length
2.23 -0.2 2.03 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.tick_nohz_next_event
1.93 ? 2% -0.2 1.77 ? 7% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.clockevents_program_event
0.42 ? 22% -0.1 0.29 ? 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.rcu_core
0.58 ? 5% -0.1 0.46 ? 6% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.tick_nohz_irq_exit
0.30 ? 12% -0.1 0.19 ? 8% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.tick_check_broadcast_expired
0.35 ? 13% -0.1 0.26 ? 8% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.hrtimer_forward
0.97 ? 3% -0.1 0.89 ? 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.update_irq_load_avg
0.63 ? 7% -0.1 0.55 ? 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.irqentry_enter
0.17 ? 9% -0.1 0.09 ? 13% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.get_callchain_entry
0.21 ? 9% -0.1 0.15 ? 7% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.get_stack_info
0.72 ? 2% -0.1 0.67 ? 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.hrtimer_update_next_event
0.15 ? 10% -0.1 0.09 ? 9% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.get_stack_info_noinstr
0.26 ? 6% -0.1 0.20 ? 6% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.tick_check_oneshot_broadcast_this_cpu
0.29 ? 5% -0.1 0.24 ? 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.get_cpu_device
0.21 ? 15% -0.0 0.16 ? 7% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__calc_delta
0.11 ? 5% -0.0 0.06 ? 14% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.arch_cpu_idle_exit
0.42 ? 5% -0.0 0.37 ? 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.rcu_nmi_enter
0.35 ? 4% -0.0 0.31 ? 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__hrtimer_get_next_event
0.12 ? 5% +0.0 0.14 ? 7% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.switch_mm_irqs_off
0.25 ? 3% +0.0 0.28 ? 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.rcu_dynticks_eqs_exit
0.16 ? 6% +0.0 0.19 ? 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.cpuidle_not_available
0.18 ? 6% +0.0 0.21 ? 6% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.get_futex_key
0.23 ? 2% +0.0 0.27 ? 7% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.rcu_eqs_enter
0.33 ? 5% +0.1 0.38 ? 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__x86_indirect_thunk_rax
0.18 ? 6% +0.1 0.25 ? 6% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.reweight_entity
0.67 ? 8% +0.1 0.79 ? 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__update_load_avg_cfs_rq
14.79 ? 5% +1.0 15.82 ? 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.futex_wait_queue_me
15.60 ? 5% +1.0 16.65 ? 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.futex_wait
14.92 ? 5% +1.1 15.99 ? 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.schedule
19.72 ? 3% +1.1 20.82 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.do_futex
19.85 ? 3% +1.1 20.97 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__x64_sys_futex
18.42 ? 4% +1.2 19.57 ? 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__schedule
2.61 ? 5% -0.3 2.29 ? 3% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.ktime_get
0.29 ? 11% -0.1 0.19 ? 8% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.tick_check_broadcast_expired
0.19 ? 17% -0.1 0.09 ? 7% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.rcu_core
0.52 ? 4% -0.1 0.42 ? 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.tick_nohz_next_event
0.34 ? 13% -0.1 0.25 ? 7% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.hrtimer_forward
0.95 ? 3% -0.1 0.87 ? 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.update_irq_load_avg
0.16 ? 7% -0.1 0.09 ? 13% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.get_callchain_entry
0.30 ? 5% -0.1 0.25 ? 6% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.get_next_timer_interrupt
0.47 ? 4% -0.1 0.42 ? 5% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.irq_exit_rcu
0.21 ? 16% -0.0 0.16 ? 9% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__calc_delta
0.29 ? 7% -0.0 0.24 ? 5% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.get_cpu_device
0.19 ? 7% -0.0 0.14 ? 5% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.tick_check_oneshot_broadcast_this_cpu
0.40 ? 5% -0.0 0.36 ? 5% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.rcu_nmi_enter
0.21 ? 4% -0.0 0.18 ? 5% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.futex_wait
0.12 ? 5% -0.0 0.09 ? 10% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.futex_wait_queue_me
0.16 ? 3% -0.0 0.14 ? 6% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.menu_reflect
0.17 ? 7% +0.0 0.19 ? 3% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.pick_next_task_fair
0.15 ? 5% +0.0 0.17 ? 8% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.rcu_eqs_enter
0.21 ? 3% +0.0 0.24 ? 6% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.___perf_sw_event
0.07 ? 14% +0.0 0.10 ? 6% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.schedule
0.24 ? 8% +0.0 0.28 ? 5% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.update_cfs_group
0.16 ? 8% +0.0 0.20 ? 6% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.get_futex_key
0.61 ? 4% +0.0 0.65 ? 3% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__schedule
0.25 ? 6% +0.1 0.31 ? 3% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__x86_indirect_thunk_rax
0.17 ? 5% +0.1 0.23 ? 7% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.reweight_entity
0.63 ? 7% +0.1 0.75 ? 5% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__update_load_avg_cfs_rq
2898038 +8.9% 3157167 interrupts.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10526 ? 3% +9.5% 11524 ? 4% interrupts.CPU10.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10853 ? 3% +10.1% 11954 ? 3% interrupts.CPU102.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
1273 ? 35% +24.1% 1580 ? 31% interrupts.CPU106.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
1273 ? 35% +24.1% 1580 ? 31% interrupts.CPU106.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
10783 ? 3% +10.3% 11894 interrupts.CPU108.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10808 ? 5% +9.3% 11812 ? 7% interrupts.CPU112.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
11046 ? 5% +9.8% 12123 ? 3% interrupts.CPU119.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10373 ? 4% +13.9% 11817 ? 3% interrupts.CPU12.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10583 ? 5% +14.3% 12101 ? 2% interrupts.CPU128.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10741 ? 2% +15.0% 12348 ? 2% interrupts.CPU129.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
4108 ? 8% +12.9% 4639 ? 6% interrupts.CPU129.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
10811 ? 3% +12.3% 12144 ? 5% interrupts.CPU130.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10524 ? 5% +12.6% 11848 ? 3% interrupts.CPU131.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
11026 ? 5% +10.0% 12124 ? 2% interrupts.CPU139.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
4167 ? 8% +15.2% 4801 ? 7% interrupts.CPU139.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
3820 ? 8% +28.4% 4907 ? 3% interrupts.CPU146.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
10618 ? 4% +13.5% 12057 ? 5% interrupts.CPU148.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10906 +8.5% 11835 ? 5% interrupts.CPU149.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
173.50 ? 42% +99.4% 346.00 ? 43% interrupts.CPU150.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
10656 ? 6% +13.6% 12102 ? 4% interrupts.CPU153.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10487 ? 5% +13.2% 11871 ? 2% interrupts.CPU158.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10682 ? 6% +9.4% 11686 ? 4% interrupts.CPU16.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
1071 ? 30% +55.7% 1667 ? 30% interrupts.CPU16.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
1071 ? 30% +55.7% 1667 ? 30% interrupts.CPU16.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
10469 ? 2% +9.7% 11487 ? 4% interrupts.CPU160.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10303 ? 3% +15.6% 11909 ? 4% interrupts.CPU163.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10580 ? 2% +11.3% 11779 ? 4% interrupts.CPU167.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10433 ? 2% +14.2% 11913 ? 5% interrupts.CPU168.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
4076 ? 4% +16.0% 4726 ? 7% interrupts.CPU168.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
1099 ? 29% +56.7% 1723 ? 28% interrupts.CPU17.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
1099 ? 29% +56.7% 1723 ? 28% interrupts.CPU17.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
3934 ? 9% +22.5% 4819 ? 10% interrupts.CPU175.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
1072 ? 31% +72.7% 1852 ? 17% interrupts.CPU176.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
1072 ? 31% +72.7% 1852 ? 17% interrupts.CPU176.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
1086 ? 27% +53.4% 1667 ? 27% interrupts.CPU180.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
1086 ? 27% +53.4% 1667 ? 27% interrupts.CPU180.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
10114 ? 3% +14.1% 11538 ? 7% interrupts.CPU181.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10584 ? 6% +14.3% 12094 ? 3% interrupts.CPU182.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
9928 ? 3% +14.9% 11403 ? 5% interrupts.CPU184.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
151.67 ? 49% +91.2% 290.00 ? 39% interrupts.CPU187.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
10887 ? 5% +8.5% 11811 ? 4% interrupts.CPU191.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10510 ? 5% +13.6% 11943 ? 6% interrupts.CPU194.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10403 ? 5% +15.0% 11961 ? 6% interrupts.CPU195.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
4025 ? 7% +14.7% 4618 ? 9% interrupts.CPU195.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
10799 ? 5% +13.1% 12213 ? 3% interrupts.CPU196.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10732 ? 4% +12.9% 12113 ? 5% interrupts.CPU197.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10706 ? 3% +10.3% 11805 ? 4% interrupts.CPU198.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10397 ? 3% +15.6% 12019 ? 4% interrupts.CPU20.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10499 ? 7% +12.3% 11789 ? 4% interrupts.CPU200.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10576 ? 7% +13.3% 11983 ? 5% interrupts.CPU201.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10467 ? 6% +14.0% 11936 ? 3% interrupts.CPU207.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10379 ? 4% +12.7% 11702 ? 3% interrupts.CPU208.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10168 ? 5% +14.0% 11595 interrupts.CPU209.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
98.00 ? 18% +106.6% 202.50 ? 40% interrupts.CPU209.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
3839 ? 5% +13.0% 4338 ? 8% interrupts.CPU209.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
89.50 ? 14% +49.2% 133.50 ? 37% interrupts.CPU210.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
10490 ? 3% +9.9% 11525 ? 4% interrupts.CPU211.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
85.50 ? 9% +109.7% 179.33 ? 44% interrupts.CPU211.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
1014 ? 33% +39.8% 1419 ? 30% interrupts.CPU215.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
1014 ? 33% +39.8% 1419 ? 30% interrupts.CPU215.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
10126 ? 4% +15.5% 11697 ? 4% interrupts.CPU216.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10605 ? 2% +10.5% 11718 ? 2% interrupts.CPU217.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10112 ? 7% +12.6% 11384 ? 5% interrupts.CPU218.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10729 ? 4% +7.8% 11565 ? 3% interrupts.CPU221.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10201 ? 6% +14.4% 11672 ? 5% interrupts.CPU226.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
87.33 ? 3% +163.5% 230.17 ? 62% interrupts.CPU228.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
10056 ? 2% +14.6% 11522 ? 4% interrupts.CPU229.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
3747 ? 8% +19.3% 4471 ? 6% interrupts.CPU229.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
10198 ? 3% +15.4% 11773 ? 4% interrupts.CPU231.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10401 ? 3% +13.8% 11834 ? 4% interrupts.CPU232.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10468 ? 2% +12.2% 11749 ? 3% interrupts.CPU235.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10571 ? 7% +10.8% 11711 ? 5% interrupts.CPU237.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
1064 ? 29% +41.2% 1502 ? 31% interrupts.CPU238.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
1064 ? 29% +41.2% 1502 ? 31% interrupts.CPU238.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
10496 ? 4% +13.1% 11874 ? 2% interrupts.CPU239.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
433.50 ? 4% +37.2% 594.67 ? 17% interrupts.CPU24.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
10349 ? 4% +13.0% 11692 ? 4% interrupts.CPU242.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
928.33 ? 3% +73.2% 1608 ? 29% interrupts.CPU242.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
928.33 ? 3% +73.2% 1608 ? 29% interrupts.CPU242.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
10391 ? 3% +13.3% 11774 ? 3% interrupts.CPU243.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
115.33 ? 51% +157.9% 297.50 ? 63% interrupts.CPU247.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
10229 ? 4% +13.2% 11582 ? 4% interrupts.CPU248.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10383 ? 5% +14.3% 11865 ? 5% interrupts.CPU250.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
1061 ? 35% +60.5% 1703 ? 20% interrupts.CPU252.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
1061 ? 35% +60.5% 1703 ? 20% interrupts.CPU252.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
10224 ? 3% +13.4% 11597 ? 7% interrupts.CPU253.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
3943 ? 9% +21.2% 4778 ? 7% interrupts.CPU259.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
10514 ? 3% +9.5% 11514 ? 3% interrupts.CPU260.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
9841 ? 5% +14.8% 11300 ? 5% interrupts.CPU262.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10282 ? 4% +14.0% 11717 ? 6% interrupts.CPU265.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
3757 ? 9% +19.1% 4473 ? 4% interrupts.CPU265.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
10278 ? 5% +11.0% 11410 ? 2% interrupts.CPU267.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10533 ? 5% +11.1% 11700 ? 4% interrupts.CPU27.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10768 ? 4% +12.6% 12120 ? 3% interrupts.CPU3.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10005 ? 8% +16.8% 11683 ? 5% interrupts.CPU4.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
449.00 ? 9% +18.4% 531.83 ? 12% interrupts.CPU4.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
10423 ? 6% +11.7% 11646 ? 6% interrupts.CPU44.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
9992 ? 5% +15.9% 11579 ? 5% interrupts.CPU45.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10162 ? 5% +13.8% 11562 ? 3% interrupts.CPU48.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
4052 ? 11% +22.3% 4957 ? 10% interrupts.CPU48.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
10134 ? 5% +12.5% 11402 ? 4% interrupts.CPU49.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10332 ? 5% +8.8% 11236 ? 4% interrupts.CPU5.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
954.50 ? 5% +22.6% 1170 ? 24% interrupts.CPU54.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
954.50 ? 5% +22.6% 1170 ? 24% interrupts.CPU54.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
10374 ? 6% +12.8% 11699 ? 3% interrupts.CPU58.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10759 ? 3% +11.5% 11993 interrupts.CPU59.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10832 ? 3% +8.8% 11781 ? 3% interrupts.CPU6.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10992 ? 2% +12.2% 12331 ? 3% interrupts.CPU60.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
11046 ? 6% +9.1% 12054 ? 3% interrupts.CPU64.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
190.67 ? 14% +55.3% 296.17 ? 22% interrupts.CPU72.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
10447 ? 6% +12.6% 11761 ? 5% interrupts.CPU73.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
185.00 ? 7% +25.8% 232.67 ? 19% interrupts.CPU75.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
10914 ? 4% +10.3% 12043 ? 4% interrupts.CPU80.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10675 ? 4% +14.3% 12198 ? 3% interrupts.CPU81.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
259.17 ? 37% +34.7% 349.17 ? 33% interrupts.CPU83.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
208.67 ? 9% +50.3% 313.67 ? 30% interrupts.CPU86.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
10961 ? 3% +9.3% 11985 ? 3% interrupts.CPU88.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10581 +15.3% 12199 ? 3% interrupts.CPU90.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
10889 ? 2% +11.3% 12116 ? 2% interrupts.CPU95.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
975.33 ? 4% +44.0% 1404 ? 35% interrupts.CPU98.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
975.33 ? 4% +44.0% 1404 ? 35% interrupts.CPU98.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
pigz.throughput
1.9e+08 +----------------------------------------------------------------+
| |
| O |
1.85e+08 |-+ |
| O O O O O O O O |
| O O O O O O O O O |
1.8e+08 |-+ O O O O |
| .+.. |
1.75e+08 |-+ .+.. +..+ + .+ +.+.. .+ +.|
| .+ + +.+.. .. + .+. + .. .+. + .. |
|. + + +.+ +..+ + + + |
1.7e+08 |-+ : + |
| : + |
| + |
1.65e+08 +----------------------------------------------------------------+
[*] bisect-good sample
[O] bisect-bad sample
Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.
---
0DAY/LKP+ Test Infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected] Intel Corporation
Thanks,
Oliver Sang