2021-03-26 21:24:40

by Andrew Halaney

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RT v5.12-rc3-rt3] __call_rcu with KASAN causes invalid sleeping function call

Hi,

I booted the RT kernel (v5.12-rc3-rt3) with KASAN enabled for the first
time today and noticed this:

[ 2.670635] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:951
[ 2.670638] in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 19, name: pgdatinit0
[ 2.670649] 8 locks held by pgdatinit0/19:
[ 2.670651] #0: ffffffffb6e0a1e0 (tasklist_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: release_task+0x110/0x480
[ 2.670666] #1: ffffffffb7364d80 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rt_write_lock+0x292/0x3a0
[ 2.670683] #2: ffff888100364860 (&sighand->siglock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __exit_signal+0x11d/0x1180
[ 2.670690] #3: ffffffffb7364d80 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rt_spin_lock+0x5/0xb0
[ 2.670696] #4: ffff888100395e10 (&(&sig->stats_lock)->lock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __exit_signal+0x276/0x1180
[ 2.670701] #5: ffffffffb7364d80 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rt_spin_lock+0x5/0xb0
[ 2.670707] #6: ffff888100395d38 (&____s->seqcount#3){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: release_task+0x1d6/0x480
[ 2.670713] #7: ffffffffb77516c0 (depot_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: stack_depot_save+0x1b9/0x440
[ 2.670736] irq event stamp: 31790
[ 2.670738] hardirqs last enabled at (31789): [<ffffffffb5a58cbd>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2d/0xe0
[ 2.670741] hardirqs last disabled at (31790): [<ffffffffb3dc5d86>] __call_rcu+0x436/0x880
[ 2.670746] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffffb3be1737>] copy_process+0x1357/0x4f90
[ 2.670751] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
[ 2.670763] CPU: 0 PID: 19 Comm: pgdatinit0 Not tainted 5.12.0-rc3-rt3 #1
[ 2.670766] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 0.5.1 01/01/2011
[ 2.670768] Call Trace:
[ 2.670790] ? unwind_next_frame+0x11e/0x1ce0
[ 2.670800] dump_stack+0x93/0xc2
[ 2.670826] ___might_sleep.cold+0x1b2/0x1f1
[ 2.670838] rt_spin_lock+0x3b/0xb0
[ 2.670838] ? stack_depot_save+0x1b9/0x440
[ 2.670838] stack_depot_save+0x1b9/0x440
[ 2.670838] kasan_save_stack+0x32/0x40
[ 2.670838] ? kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40
[ 2.670838] ? kasan_record_aux_stack+0xa5/0xb0
[ 2.670838] ? __call_rcu+0x117/0x880
[ 2.670838] ? __exit_signal+0xafb/0x1180
[ 2.670838] ? release_task+0x1d6/0x480
[ 2.670838] ? exit_notify+0x303/0x750
[ 2.670838] ? do_exit+0x678/0xcf0
[ 2.670838] ? kthread+0x364/0x4f0
[ 2.670838] ? ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
[ 2.670838] ? mark_held_locks+0xa5/0xe0
[ 2.670838] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare.part.0+0x18a/0x370
[ 2.670838] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2d/0xe0
[ 2.670838] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x77/0x100
[ 2.670838] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x38/0xe0
[ 2.670838] ? debug_object_active_state+0x273/0x370
[ 2.670838] ? debug_object_activate+0x380/0x460
[ 2.670838] ? alloc_object+0x960/0x960
[ 2.670838] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x77/0x100
[ 2.670838] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x38/0xe0
[ 2.670838] ? __call_rcu+0x436/0x880
[ 2.670838] ? lockdep_hardirqs_off+0x90/0xd0
[ 2.670838] kasan_record_aux_stack+0xa5/0xb0
[ 2.670838] __call_rcu+0x117/0x880
[ 2.670838] ? put_pid+0x10/0x10
[ 2.670838] ? rt_spin_unlock+0x31/0x80
[ 2.670838] ? rcu_implicit_dynticks_qs+0xab0/0xab0
[ 2.670838] ? free_pid+0x19c/0x260
[ 2.670838] __exit_signal+0xafb/0x1180
[ 2.670838] ? trace_sched_process_exit+0x1b0/0x1b0
[ 2.670838] ? rcu_is_watching+0xf1/0x160
[ 2.670838] ? rt_write_lock+0x306/0x3a0
[ 2.670838] ? release_task+0x23/0x480
[ 2.670838] release_task+0x1d6/0x480
[ 2.670838] exit_notify+0x303/0x750
[ 2.670838] ? cgroup_exit+0x306/0x830
[ 2.670838] ? forget_original_parent+0xb80/0xb80
[ 2.670838] ? perf_event_exit_task+0x1b3/0x2d0
[ 2.670838] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x70
[ 2.670838] do_exit+0x678/0xcf0
[ 2.670838] ? exit_mm+0x5b0/0x5b0
[ 2.670838] ? __kthread_parkme+0xc9/0x280
[ 2.670838] ? setup_nr_node_ids+0x2a/0x2a
[ 2.670838] kthread+0x364/0x4f0
[ 2.670838] ? __kthread_parkme+0x280/0x280
[ 2.670838] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30

Please let me know if you want any more info.

Thanks,
Andrew


2021-03-27 05:11:04

by Mike Galbraith

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RT v5.12-rc3-rt3] __call_rcu with KASAN causes invalid sleeping function call

On Fri, 2021-03-26 at 16:20 -0500, Andrew Halaney wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I booted the RT kernel (v5.12-rc3-rt3) with KASAN enabled for the first
> time today and noticed this:

That should probably be one of the auto-disabled config options. I
started down the fix the KASAN gripes path, and quickly determined that
that was a job for someone with motivation that I fortunately lacked.

-Mike