The opening comment mark '/**' is used for highlighting the beginning of
kernel-doc comments.
The header for arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c follows this syntax, but the
content inside does not comply with kernel-doc.
This line was probably not meant for kernel-doc parsing, but is parsed
due to the presence of kernel-doc like comment syntax(i.e, '/**'), which
causes unexpected warning from kernel-doc:
"warning: expecting prototype for OMAP1 Dual(). Prototype was for OMAP1610_GPTIMER1_BASE() instead"
Provide a simple fix by replacing this occurrence with general comment
format, i.e. '/*', to prevent kernel-doc from parsing it.
Signed-off-by: Aditya Srivastava <[email protected]>
---
* Applies perfectly on next-20210326
arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c
index 97fc2096b970..0411d5508d63 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/**
+/*
* OMAP1 Dual-Mode Timers - platform device registration
*
* Contains first level initialization routines which internally
--
2.17.1
On 3/30/21 1:53 PM, Aditya Srivastava wrote:
> The opening comment mark '/**' is used for highlighting the beginning of
> kernel-doc comments.
> The header for arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c follows this syntax, but the
> content inside does not comply with kernel-doc.
>
> This line was probably not meant for kernel-doc parsing, but is parsed
> due to the presence of kernel-doc like comment syntax(i.e, '/**'), which
> causes unexpected warning from kernel-doc:
> "warning: expecting prototype for OMAP1 Dual(). Prototype was for OMAP1610_GPTIMER1_BASE() instead"
>
> Provide a simple fix by replacing this occurrence with general comment
> format, i.e. '/*', to prevent kernel-doc from parsing it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aditya Srivastava <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
> ---
> * Applies perfectly on next-20210326
>
> arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c
> index 97fc2096b970..0411d5508d63 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -/**
> +/*
> * OMAP1 Dual-Mode Timers - platform device registration
> *
> * Contains first level initialization routines which internally
>
--
~Randy
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 02:23:30AM +0530, Aditya Srivastava wrote:
> The opening comment mark '/**' is used for highlighting the beginning of
> kernel-doc comments.
> The header for arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c follows this syntax, but the
> content inside does not comply with kernel-doc.
>
> This line was probably not meant for kernel-doc parsing, but is parsed
> due to the presence of kernel-doc like comment syntax(i.e, '/**'), which
> causes unexpected warning from kernel-doc:
> "warning: expecting prototype for OMAP1 Dual(). Prototype was for OMAP1610_GPTIMER1_BASE() instead"
>
> Provide a simple fix by replacing this occurrence with general comment
> format, i.e. '/*', to prevent kernel-doc from parsing it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aditya Srivastava <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Aaro Koskinen <[email protected]>
A.
> ---
> * Applies perfectly on next-20210326
>
> arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c
> index 97fc2096b970..0411d5508d63 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -/**
> +/*
> * OMAP1 Dual-Mode Timers - platform device registration
> *
> * Contains first level initialization routines which internally
> --
> 2.17.1
>
* Aditya Srivastava <[email protected]> [210330 23:54]:
> The opening comment mark '/**' is used for highlighting the beginning of
> kernel-doc comments.
> The header for arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c follows this syntax, but the
> content inside does not comply with kernel-doc.
>
> This line was probably not meant for kernel-doc parsing, but is parsed
> due to the presence of kernel-doc like comment syntax(i.e, '/**'), which
> causes unexpected warning from kernel-doc:
> "warning: expecting prototype for OMAP1 Dual(). Prototype was for OMAP1610_GPTIMER1_BASE() instead"
>
> Provide a simple fix by replacing this occurrence with general comment
> format, i.e. '/*', to prevent kernel-doc from parsing it.
Thanks applying into omap-for-v5.13/soc.
Tony