BIT macro is not supported in dt-bindings. Replace it with generic bit
operations.
Fixes: 630dce2810b9 ("dt-bindings: connector: Add SVDM VDO properties")
Signed-off-by: Kyle Tso <[email protected]>
---
include/dt-bindings/usb/pd.h | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/usb/pd.h b/include/dt-bindings/usb/pd.h
index fef3ef65967f..cb70b4ceedde 100644
--- a/include/dt-bindings/usb/pd.h
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/usb/pd.h
@@ -163,10 +163,10 @@
#define UFP_VDO_VER1_2 2
/* Device Capability */
-#define DEV_USB2_CAPABLE BIT(0)
-#define DEV_USB2_BILLBOARD BIT(1)
-#define DEV_USB3_CAPABLE BIT(2)
-#define DEV_USB4_CAPABLE BIT(3)
+#define DEV_USB2_CAPABLE (1 << 0)
+#define DEV_USB2_BILLBOARD (1 << 1)
+#define DEV_USB3_CAPABLE (1 << 2)
+#define DEV_USB4_CAPABLE (1 << 3)
/* Connector Type */
#define UFP_RECEPTACLE 2
@@ -191,9 +191,9 @@
/* Alternate Modes */
#define UFP_ALTMODE_NOT_SUPP 0
-#define UFP_ALTMODE_TBT3 BIT(0)
-#define UFP_ALTMODE_RECFG BIT(1)
-#define UFP_ALTMODE_NO_RECFG BIT(2)
+#define UFP_ALTMODE_TBT3 (1 << 0)
+#define UFP_ALTMODE_RECFG (1 << 1)
+#define UFP_ALTMODE_NO_RECFG (1 << 2)
/* USB Highest Speed */
#define UFP_USB2_ONLY 0
@@ -217,9 +217,9 @@
* <4:0> :: Port number
*/
#define DFP_VDO_VER1_1 1
-#define HOST_USB2_CAPABLE BIT(0)
-#define HOST_USB3_CAPABLE BIT(1)
-#define HOST_USB4_CAPABLE BIT(2)
+#define HOST_USB2_CAPABLE (1 << 0)
+#define HOST_USB3_CAPABLE (1 << 1)
+#define HOST_USB4_CAPABLE (1 << 2)
#define DFP_RECEPTACLE 2
#define DFP_CAPTIVE 3
--
2.31.1.818.g46aad6cb9e-goog
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 6:21 PM Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 06:13:45PM +0800, Kyle Tso wrote:
> > BIT macro is not supported in dt-bindings. Replace it with generic bit
> > operations.
>
> Why isn't the BIT macro supported there? How are we going to "remember"
> that I should not take patches that use this #define in that location?
I rephrased the commit message in v2
thanks,
Kyle
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 06:13:45PM +0800, Kyle Tso wrote:
> BIT macro is not supported in dt-bindings. Replace it with generic bit
> operations.
Why isn't the BIT macro supported there? How are we going to "remember"
that I should not take patches that use this #define in that location?
thanks,
greg k-h