2021-05-30 02:22:38

by Axel Lin

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: mt6315: Fix function prototype for mt6315_map_mode

The .of_map_mode should has below function prototype:
unsigned int (*of_map_mode)(unsigned int mode);

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <[email protected]>
---
drivers/regulator/mt6315-regulator.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/mt6315-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/mt6315-regulator.c
index 8c5d72869c2b..865a292bedcb 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/mt6315-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/mt6315-regulator.c
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static const struct linear_range mt_volt_range1[] = {
REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(0, 0, 0xbf, 6250),
};

-static unsigned int mt6315_map_mode(u32 mode)
+static unsigned int mt6315_map_mode(unsigned int mode)
{
switch (mode) {
case MT6315_BUCK_MODE_AUTO:
--
2.25.1


2021-06-01 17:41:31

by Mark Brown

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: mt6315: Fix function prototype for mt6315_map_mode

On Sun, 30 May 2021 10:21:09 +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> The .of_map_mode should has below function prototype:
> unsigned int (*of_map_mode)(unsigned int mode);

Applied to

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: mt6315: Fix function prototype for mt6315_map_mode
commit: 89082179ec5028bcd58c87171e08ada035689542

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark