2021-06-23 01:36:20

by gushengxian

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] net: caif: add a return statement

From: gushengxian <[email protected]>

Return statement is needed in every condition in Int function.
Fixed some grammar issues.

Signed-off-by: gushengxian <[email protected]>
---
net/caif/caif_socket.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/caif/caif_socket.c b/net/caif/caif_socket.c
index 3ad0a1df6712..84a00b9cb0dc 100644
--- a/net/caif/caif_socket.c
+++ b/net/caif/caif_socket.c
@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ static int caif_seqpkt_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m,
if (flags & MSG_OOB)
goto read_error;

- skb = skb_recv_datagram(sk, flags, 0 , &ret);
+ skb = skb_recv_datagram(sk, flags, 0, &ret);
if (!skb)
goto read_error;
copylen = skb->len;
@@ -295,6 +295,7 @@ static int caif_seqpkt_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m,
goto out_free;

ret = (flags & MSG_TRUNC) ? skb->len : copylen;
+ return ret;
out_free:
skb_free_datagram(sk, skb);
caif_check_flow_release(sk);
@@ -615,7 +616,7 @@ static int caif_stream_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,

while (sent < len) {

- size = len-sent;
+ size = len - sent;

if (size > cf_sk->maxframe)
size = cf_sk->maxframe;
@@ -815,8 +816,8 @@ static int caif_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr,
sock->state = SS_CONNECTING;
sk->sk_state = CAIF_CONNECTING;

- /* Check priority value comming from socket */
- /* if priority value is out of range it will be ajusted */
+ /* Check priority value coming from socket */
+ /* if priority value is out of range it will be adjusted */
if (cf_sk->sk.sk_priority > CAIF_PRIO_MAX)
cf_sk->conn_req.priority = CAIF_PRIO_MAX;
else if (cf_sk->sk.sk_priority < CAIF_PRIO_MIN)
--
2.25.1


2021-06-23 10:51:56

by Eric Dumazet

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: caif: add a return statement



On 6/23/21 3:32 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> From: gushengxian <[email protected]>
>
> Return statement is needed in every condition in Int function.


??? Are you a bot ??

Is it a real patch. How was it tested ?

> Fixed some grammar issues.
>
> Signed-off-by: gushengxian <[email protected]>
> ---
> net/caif/caif_socket.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/caif/caif_socket.c b/net/caif/caif_socket.c
> index 3ad0a1df6712..84a00b9cb0dc 100644
> --- a/net/caif/caif_socket.c
> +++ b/net/caif/caif_socket.c
> @@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ static int caif_seqpkt_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m,
> if (flags & MSG_OOB)
> goto read_error;
>
> - skb = skb_recv_datagram(sk, flags, 0 , &ret);
> + skb = skb_recv_datagram(sk, flags, 0, &ret);
> if (!skb)
> goto read_error;
> copylen = skb->len;
> @@ -295,6 +295,7 @@ static int caif_seqpkt_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m,
> goto out_free;
>
> ret = (flags & MSG_TRUNC) ? skb->len : copylen;
> + return ret;

This is completely bogus.

> out_free:
> skb_free_datagram(sk, skb);
> caif_check_flow_release(sk);
> @@ -615,7 +616,7 @@ static int caif_stream_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
>
> while (sent < len) {
>
> - size = len-sent;
> + size = len - sent;
>
> if (size > cf_sk->maxframe)
> size = cf_sk->maxframe;
> @@ -815,8 +816,8 @@ static int caif_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr,
> sock->state = SS_CONNECTING;
> sk->sk_state = CAIF_CONNECTING;
>
> - /* Check priority value comming from socket */
> - /* if priority value is out of range it will be ajusted */
> + /* Check priority value coming from socket */
> + /* if priority value is out of range it will be adjusted */
> if (cf_sk->sk.sk_priority > CAIF_PRIO_MAX)
> cf_sk->conn_req.priority = CAIF_PRIO_MAX;
> else if (cf_sk->sk.sk_priority < CAIF_PRIO_MIN)
>