Commit fad003b6c8e3d ("Bluetooth: Fix inconsistent lock state with
RFCOMM") fixed a lockdep warning due to sk->sk_lock.slock being
acquired without disabling softirq while the lock is also used in
softirq context. This was done by disabling interrupts before calling
bh_lock_sock in rfcomm_sk_state_change.
Later, this was changed in commit e6da0edc24ee ("Bluetooth: Acquire
sk_lock.slock without disabling interrupts") to disable softirqs
only.
However, there is another instance of sk->sk_lock.slock being acquired
without disabling softirq in rfcomm_connect_ind. This patch fixes this
by disabling local bh before the call to bh_lock_sock.
Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <[email protected]>
---
net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c
index ae6f80730561..d8734abb2df4 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c
@@ -974,6 +974,7 @@ int rfcomm_connect_ind(struct rfcomm_session *s, u8 channel, struct rfcomm_dlc *
if (!parent)
return 0;
+ local_bh_disable();
bh_lock_sock(parent);
/* Check for backlog size */
@@ -1002,6 +1003,7 @@ int rfcomm_connect_ind(struct rfcomm_session *s, u8 channel, struct rfcomm_dlc *
done:
bh_unlock_sock(parent);
+ local_bh_enable();
if (test_bit(BT_SK_DEFER_SETUP, &bt_sk(parent)->flags))
parent->sk_state_change(parent);
--
2.25.1