2021-08-26 01:02:39

by quanyang wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RESEND][PATCH] spi: spi-zynq-qspi: use wait_for_completion_timeout to make zynq_qspi_exec_mem_op not interruptible

From: Quanyang Wang <[email protected]>

The function wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout will return
-ERESTARTSYS immediately when receiving SIGKILL signal which is sent
by "jffs2_gcd_mtd" during umounting jffs2. This will break the SPI memory
operation because the data transmitting may begin before the command or
address transmitting completes. Use wait_for_completion_timeout to prevent
the process from being interruptible.

Fixes: 67dca5e580f1 ("spi: spi-mem: Add support for Zynq QSPI controller")
Signed-off-by: Quanyang Wang <[email protected]>
---
drivers/spi/spi-zynq-qspi.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-zynq-qspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-zynq-qspi.c
index 9262c6418463..cfa222c9bd5e 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-zynq-qspi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-zynq-qspi.c
@@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ static int zynq_qspi_exec_mem_op(struct spi_mem *mem,
zynq_qspi_write_op(xqspi, ZYNQ_QSPI_FIFO_DEPTH, true);
zynq_qspi_write(xqspi, ZYNQ_QSPI_IEN_OFFSET,
ZYNQ_QSPI_IXR_RXTX_MASK);
- if (!wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&xqspi->data_completion,
+ if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&xqspi->data_completion,
msecs_to_jiffies(1000)))
err = -ETIMEDOUT;
}
@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ static int zynq_qspi_exec_mem_op(struct spi_mem *mem,
zynq_qspi_write_op(xqspi, ZYNQ_QSPI_FIFO_DEPTH, true);
zynq_qspi_write(xqspi, ZYNQ_QSPI_IEN_OFFSET,
ZYNQ_QSPI_IXR_RXTX_MASK);
- if (!wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&xqspi->data_completion,
+ if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&xqspi->data_completion,
msecs_to_jiffies(1000)))
err = -ETIMEDOUT;
}
@@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ static int zynq_qspi_exec_mem_op(struct spi_mem *mem,
zynq_qspi_write_op(xqspi, ZYNQ_QSPI_FIFO_DEPTH, true);
zynq_qspi_write(xqspi, ZYNQ_QSPI_IEN_OFFSET,
ZYNQ_QSPI_IXR_RXTX_MASK);
- if (!wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&xqspi->data_completion,
+ if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&xqspi->data_completion,
msecs_to_jiffies(1000)))
err = -ETIMEDOUT;

@@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ static int zynq_qspi_exec_mem_op(struct spi_mem *mem,
zynq_qspi_write_op(xqspi, ZYNQ_QSPI_FIFO_DEPTH, true);
zynq_qspi_write(xqspi, ZYNQ_QSPI_IEN_OFFSET,
ZYNQ_QSPI_IXR_RXTX_MASK);
- if (!wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&xqspi->data_completion,
+ if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&xqspi->data_completion,
msecs_to_jiffies(1000)))
err = -ETIMEDOUT;
}
--
2.25.1


2021-08-26 14:19:34

by Mark Brown

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH] spi: spi-zynq-qspi: use wait_for_completion_timeout to make zynq_qspi_exec_mem_op not interruptible

On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 08:59:30 +0800, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Quanyang Wang <[email protected]>
>
> The function wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout will return
> -ERESTARTSYS immediately when receiving SIGKILL signal which is sent
> by "jffs2_gcd_mtd" during umounting jffs2. This will break the SPI memory
> operation because the data transmitting may begin before the command or
> address transmitting completes. Use wait_for_completion_timeout to prevent
> the process from being interruptible.
>
> [...]

Applied to

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: spi-zynq-qspi: use wait_for_completion_timeout to make zynq_qspi_exec_mem_op not interruptible
commit: 26cfc0dbe43aae60dc03af27077775244f26c167

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark