2021-09-21 01:23:24

by Apurva Nandan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: snps,dw-apb-ssi: Use 'flash' node name instead of 'spi-flash' in example

Change the nodename in the example with spi-nand from 'spi-flash@1'
to 'flash@1' to make the schema uniform with both spi-nand and spi-nor
flashes. jedec,spi-nor.yaml uses 'flash@' nodename for spi-nor flashes,
so make the spi-nand examples in dt-bindings use it too for uniformity.

Signed-off-by: Apurva Nandan <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml
index ca91201a9926..d7e08b03e204 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ examples:
cs-gpios = <&gpio0 13 0>,
<&gpio0 14 0>;
rx-sample-delay-ns = <3>;
- spi-flash@1 {
+ flash@1 {
compatible = "spi-nand";
reg = <1>;
rx-sample-delay-ns = <7>;
--
2.25.1


2021-09-21 02:56:59

by Rob Herring

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: snps,dw-apb-ssi: Use 'flash' node name instead of 'spi-flash' in example

On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 19:57:13 +0530, Apurva Nandan wrote:
> Change the nodename in the example with spi-nand from 'spi-flash@1'
> to 'flash@1' to make the schema uniform with both spi-nand and spi-nor
> flashes. jedec,spi-nor.yaml uses 'flash@' nodename for spi-nor flashes,
> so make the spi-nand examples in dt-bindings use it too for uniformity.
>
> Signed-off-by: Apurva Nandan <[email protected]>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>

My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):

yamllint warnings/errors:

dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.example.dt.yaml:0:0: /example-0/spi@fff00000/flash@1: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['spi-nand']

doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):

See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1530168

This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch
series is generally the most recent rc1.

If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
date:

pip3 install dtschema --upgrade

Please check and re-submit.

2021-09-21 03:00:19

by Rob Herring

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: snps,dw-apb-ssi: Use 'flash' node name instead of 'spi-flash' in example

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 07:57:13PM +0530, Apurva Nandan wrote:
> Change the nodename in the example with spi-nand from 'spi-flash@1'
> to 'flash@1' to make the schema uniform with both spi-nand and spi-nor
> flashes. jedec,spi-nor.yaml uses 'flash@' nodename for spi-nor flashes,
> so make the spi-nand examples in dt-bindings use it too for uniformity.
>
> Signed-off-by: Apurva Nandan <[email protected]>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Fixes should come first. Maybe Mark can apply this before you respin.

Acked-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>

>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml
> index ca91201a9926..d7e08b03e204 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml
> @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ examples:
> cs-gpios = <&gpio0 13 0>,
> <&gpio0 14 0>;
> rx-sample-delay-ns = <3>;
> - spi-flash@1 {
> + flash@1 {
> compatible = "spi-nand";
> reg = <1>;
> rx-sample-delay-ns = <7>;
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>

2021-09-21 13:47:36

by Apurva Nandan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: snps,dw-apb-ssi: Use 'flash' node name instead of 'spi-flash' in example


On 21/09/21 2:49 am, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 07:57:13PM +0530, Apurva Nandan wrote:
>> Change the nodename in the example with spi-nand from 'spi-flash@1'
>> to 'flash@1' to make the schema uniform with both spi-nand and spi-nor
>> flashes. jedec,spi-nor.yaml uses 'flash@' nodename for spi-nor flashes,
>> so make the spi-nand examples in dt-bindings use it too for uniformity.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Apurva Nandan <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> Fixes should come first. Maybe Mark can apply this before you respin.
>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
Please tell if I need to re-roll this series for changing the order of
the two patches.
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml
>> index ca91201a9926..d7e08b03e204 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml
>> @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ examples:
>> cs-gpios = <&gpio0 13 0>,
>> <&gpio0 14 0>;
>> rx-sample-delay-ns = <3>;
>> - spi-flash@1 {
>> + flash@1 {
>> compatible = "spi-nand";
>> reg = <1>;
>> rx-sample-delay-ns = <7>;
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>>
Thanks,
Apurva Nandan