In the modern Qualcomm platform there's no reason for having smem as a
separate node, so let's change this.
Bjorn Andersson (4):
dt-bindings: sram: Document qcom,rpm-msg-ram
dt-bindings: soc: smem: Make indirection optional
soc: qcom: smem: Support reserved-memory description
arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Drop standalone smem node
.../bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smem.yaml | 34 +++++++++--
.../devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml | 5 +-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 10 +---
drivers/of/platform.c | 1 +
drivers/soc/qcom/smem.c | 57 +++++++++++++------
5 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
--
2.29.2
Hi Bjorn,
On 9/30/21 9:21 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> In the modern Qualcomm platform there's no reason for having smem as a
> separate node, so let's change this.
>
> Bjorn Andersson (4):
> dt-bindings: sram: Document qcom,rpm-msg-ram
> dt-bindings: soc: smem: Make indirection optional
> soc: qcom: smem: Support reserved-memory description
> arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Drop standalone smem node
>
> .../bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smem.yaml | 34 +++++++++--
> .../devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml | 5 +-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 10 +---
> drivers/of/platform.c | 1 +
> drivers/soc/qcom/smem.c | 57 +++++++++++++------
> 5 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
the patch series looks good.
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <[email protected]>
--
Best wishes,
Vladimir
On Thu, 30 Sep 2021 11:21:07 -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> In the modern Qualcomm platform there's no reason for having smem as a
> separate node, so let's change this.
>
> Bjorn Andersson (4):
> dt-bindings: sram: Document qcom,rpm-msg-ram
> dt-bindings: soc: smem: Make indirection optional
> soc: qcom: smem: Support reserved-memory description
> arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Drop standalone smem node
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Drop standalone smem node
commit: 622adb84b3e7c48a888c3df26fbf28679ded660b
Best regards,
--
Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>