The struct tegra_machine_snd_ops is only assigned to the ops field in the
snd_soc_dai_link struct which is a pointer to const struct snd_soc_ops.
Make it const to allow the compiler to put it in read-only memory.
Signed-off-by: Rikard Falkeborn <[email protected]>
---
sound/soc/tegra/tegra_asoc_machine.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/tegra/tegra_asoc_machine.c b/sound/soc/tegra/tegra_asoc_machine.c
index 735909310a26..3cbe6ef1cf9f 100644
--- a/sound/soc/tegra/tegra_asoc_machine.c
+++ b/sound/soc/tegra/tegra_asoc_machine.c
@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static int tegra_machine_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
return 0;
}
-static struct snd_soc_ops tegra_machine_snd_ops = {
+static const struct snd_soc_ops tegra_machine_snd_ops = {
.hw_params = tegra_machine_hw_params,
};
--
2.33.0
On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 13:45:17 +0200, Rikard Falkeborn wrote:
> The struct tegra_machine_snd_ops is only assigned to the ops field in the
> snd_soc_dai_link struct which is a pointer to const struct snd_soc_ops.
> Make it const to allow the compiler to put it in read-only memory.
>
>
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: tegra: Constify static snd_soc_ops
commit: 620868b2a0bd56ae814bdde2598d7d7b20538e6d
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark