Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c: In function 'gelic_net_setup_netdev':
drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c:1480:26: error: passing argument 2 of 'eth_hw_addr_set' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
1480 | eth_hw_addr_set(netdev, &v1);
| ^~~
| |
| u64 * {aka long long unsigned int *}
In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c:23:
include/linux/etherdevice.h:309:70: note: expected 'const u8 *' {aka 'const unsigned char *'} but argument is of type 'u64 *' {aka 'long long unsigned int *'}
309 | static inline void eth_hw_addr_set(struct net_device *dev, const u8 *addr)
| ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
Caused by commit
a96d317fb1a3 ("ethernet: use eth_hw_addr_set()")
I have applied the following patch for today.
From: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 12:19:08 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] ethernet: fix up ps3_gelic_net.c for "ethernet: use
eth_hw_addr_set()"
Fixes: a96d317fb1a3 ("ethernet: use eth_hw_addr_set()")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c
index 1425623b868e..3dbfb1b20649 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c
@@ -1477,7 +1477,7 @@ int gelic_net_setup_netdev(struct net_device *netdev, struct gelic_card *card)
__func__, status);
return -EINVAL;
}
- eth_hw_addr_set(netdev, &v1);
+ eth_hw_addr_set(netdev, (u8 *)&v1);
if (card->vlan_required) {
netdev->hard_header_len += VLAN_HLEN;
--
2.33.0
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 12:23:15 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c: In function 'gelic_net_setup_netdev':
> drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c:1480:26: error: passing argument 2 of 'eth_hw_addr_set' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> 1480 | eth_hw_addr_set(netdev, &v1);
> | ^~~
> | |
> | u64 * {aka long long unsigned int *}
> In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c:23:
> include/linux/etherdevice.h:309:70: note: expected 'const u8 *' {aka 'const unsigned char *'} but argument is of type 'u64 *' {aka 'long long unsigned int *'}
> 309 | static inline void eth_hw_addr_set(struct net_device *dev, const u8 *addr)
> | ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
>
> Caused by commit
>
> a96d317fb1a3 ("ethernet: use eth_hw_addr_set()")
>
> I have applied the following patch for today.
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 12:19:08 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] ethernet: fix up ps3_gelic_net.c for "ethernet: use
> eth_hw_addr_set()"
>
> Fixes: a96d317fb1a3 ("ethernet: use eth_hw_addr_set()")
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c
> index 1425623b868e..3dbfb1b20649 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c
> @@ -1477,7 +1477,7 @@ int gelic_net_setup_netdev(struct net_device *netdev, struct gelic_card *card)
> __func__, status);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> - eth_hw_addr_set(netdev, &v1);
> + eth_hw_addr_set(netdev, (u8 *)&v1);
>
> if (card->vlan_required) {
> netdev->hard_header_len += VLAN_HLEN;
Applied, thanks. Is this the last one? ;)
I wonder what happened to the kbuild bot :S
Hi Jakub,
On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 18:52:17 -0700 Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Applied, thanks. Is this the last one? ;)
No idea :-(
> I wonder what happened to the kbuild bot :S
Does it do ppc builds?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 14:43:22 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 18:52:17 -0700 Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Applied, thanks. Is this the last one? ;)
>
> No idea :-(
>
> > I wonder what happened to the kbuild bot :S
>
> Does it do ppc builds?
I thought it did, I get a build status email periodically with a list
of 135 builds. PPC is well represented there.