From: Guo Ren <[email protected]>
When using "devm_request_threaded_irq(,,,,IRQF_ONESHOT,,)" in the driver,
only the first interrupt could be handled, and continue irq is blocked by
hw. Because the riscv plic couldn't complete masked irq source which has
been disabled in enable register. The bug was firstly reported in [1].
Here is the description of Interrupt Completion in PLIC spec [2]:
The PLIC signals it has completed executing an interrupt handler by
writing the interrupt ID it received from the claim to the claim/complete
register. The PLIC does not check whether the completion ID is the same
as the last claim ID for that target. If the completion ID does not match
an interrupt source that is currently enabled for the target, the
^^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^
completion is silently ignored.
[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/2021-July/007441.html
[2] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-plic-spec/blob/8bc15a35d07c9edf7b5d23fec9728302595ffc4d/riscv-plic.adoc
Reported-by: Vincent Pelletier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <[email protected]>
Cc: Anup Patel <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
Cc: Atish Patra <[email protected]>
Cc: Nikita Shubin <[email protected]>
Cc: incent Pelletier <[email protected]>
---
Changes since V6:
- Propagate to plic_irq_eoi for all riscv,plic by Nikita Shubin
- Remove thead related codes
Changes since V5:
- Move back to mask/unmask
- Fixup the problem in eoi callback
- Remove allwinner,sun20i-d1 IRQCHIP_DECLARE
- Rewrite comment log
Changes since V4:
- Update comment by Anup
Changes since V3:
- Rename "c9xx" to "c900"
- Add sifive_plic_chip and thead_plic_chip for difference
Changes since V2:
- Add a separate compatible string "thead,c9xx-plic"
- set irq_mask/unmask of "plic_chip" to NULL and point
irq_enable/disable of "plic_chip" to plic_irq_mask/unmask
- Add a detailed comment block in plic_init() about the
differences in Claim/Completion process of RISC-V PLIC and C9xx
PLIC.
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
index cf74cfa82045..259065d271ef 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
@@ -163,7 +163,13 @@ static void plic_irq_eoi(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct plic_handler *handler = this_cpu_ptr(&plic_handlers);
- writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM);
+ if (irqd_irq_masked(d)) {
+ plic_irq_unmask(d);
+ writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM);
+ plic_irq_mask(d);
+ } else {
+ writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM);
+ }
}
static struct irq_chip plic_chip = {
--
2.25.1
On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 21:17:36 +0800
[email protected] wrote:
Hi Guo Ren,
Thank you for your patch.
May be it should be applied to stable ?
Tested-by: Nikita Shubin <[email protected]>
> From: Guo Ren <[email protected]>
>
> When using "devm_request_threaded_irq(,,,,IRQF_ONESHOT,,)" in the
> driver, only the first interrupt could be handled, and continue irq
> is blocked by hw. Because the riscv plic couldn't complete masked irq
> source which has been disabled in enable register. The bug was
> firstly reported in [1].
>
> Here is the description of Interrupt Completion in PLIC spec [2]:
>
> The PLIC signals it has completed executing an interrupt handler by
> writing the interrupt ID it received from the claim to the
> claim/complete register. The PLIC does not check whether the
> completion ID is the same as the last claim ID for that target. If
> the completion ID does not match an interrupt source that is
> currently enabled for the target, the ^^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^
> completion is silently ignored.
>
> [1]
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/2021-July/007441.html
> [2]
> https://github.com/riscv/riscv-plic-spec/blob/8bc15a35d07c9edf7b5d23fec9728302595ffc4d/riscv-plic.adoc
>
> Reported-by: Vincent Pelletier <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <[email protected]>
> Cc: Anup Patel <[email protected]>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
> Cc: Atish Patra <[email protected]>
> Cc: Nikita Shubin <[email protected]>
> Cc: incent Pelletier <[email protected]>
>
> ---
>
> Changes since V6:
> - Propagate to plic_irq_eoi for all riscv,plic by Nikita Shubin
> - Remove thead related codes
>
> Changes since V5:
> - Move back to mask/unmask
> - Fixup the problem in eoi callback
> - Remove allwinner,sun20i-d1 IRQCHIP_DECLARE
> - Rewrite comment log
>
> Changes since V4:
> - Update comment by Anup
>
> Changes since V3:
> - Rename "c9xx" to "c900"
> - Add sifive_plic_chip and thead_plic_chip for difference
>
> Changes since V2:
> - Add a separate compatible string "thead,c9xx-plic"
> - set irq_mask/unmask of "plic_chip" to NULL and point
> irq_enable/disable of "plic_chip" to plic_irq_mask/unmask
> - Add a detailed comment block in plic_init() about the
> differences in Claim/Completion process of RISC-V PLIC and C9xx
> PLIC.
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c index cf74cfa82045..259065d271ef
> 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> @@ -163,7 +163,13 @@ static void plic_irq_eoi(struct irq_data *d)
> {
> struct plic_handler *handler = this_cpu_ptr(&plic_handlers);
>
> - writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM);
> + if (irqd_irq_masked(d)) {
> + plic_irq_unmask(d);
> + writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM);
> + plic_irq_mask(d);
> + } else {
> + writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM);
> + }
> }
>
> static struct irq_chip plic_chip = {
On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 9:47 PM Nikita Shubin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 21:17:36 +0800
> [email protected] wrote:
>
> Hi Guo Ren,
>
> Thank you for your patch.
>
> May be it should be applied to stable ?
Yes, I would Cc stable next.
>
> Tested-by: Nikita Shubin <[email protected]>
>
> > From: Guo Ren <[email protected]>
> >
> > When using "devm_request_threaded_irq(,,,,IRQF_ONESHOT,,)" in the
> > driver, only the first interrupt could be handled, and continue irq
> > is blocked by hw. Because the riscv plic couldn't complete masked irq
> > source which has been disabled in enable register. The bug was
> > firstly reported in [1].
> >
> > Here is the description of Interrupt Completion in PLIC spec [2]:
> >
> > The PLIC signals it has completed executing an interrupt handler by
> > writing the interrupt ID it received from the claim to the
> > claim/complete register. The PLIC does not check whether the
> > completion ID is the same as the last claim ID for that target. If
> > the completion ID does not match an interrupt source that is
> > currently enabled for the target, the ^^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^
> > completion is silently ignored.
> >
> > [1]
> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/2021-July/007441.html
> > [2]
> > https://github.com/riscv/riscv-plic-spec/blob/8bc15a35d07c9edf7b5d23fec9728302595ffc4d/riscv-plic.adoc
> >
> > Reported-by: Vincent Pelletier <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Anup Patel <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Atish Patra <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Nikita Shubin <[email protected]>
> > Cc: incent Pelletier <[email protected]>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Changes since V6:
> > - Propagate to plic_irq_eoi for all riscv,plic by Nikita Shubin
> > - Remove thead related codes
> >
> > Changes since V5:
> > - Move back to mask/unmask
> > - Fixup the problem in eoi callback
> > - Remove allwinner,sun20i-d1 IRQCHIP_DECLARE
> > - Rewrite comment log
> >
> > Changes since V4:
> > - Update comment by Anup
> >
> > Changes since V3:
> > - Rename "c9xx" to "c900"
> > - Add sifive_plic_chip and thead_plic_chip for difference
> >
> > Changes since V2:
> > - Add a separate compatible string "thead,c9xx-plic"
> > - set irq_mask/unmask of "plic_chip" to NULL and point
> > irq_enable/disable of "plic_chip" to plic_irq_mask/unmask
> > - Add a detailed comment block in plic_init() about the
> > differences in Claim/Completion process of RISC-V PLIC and C9xx
> > PLIC.
> > ---
> > drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c | 8 +++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> > b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c index cf74cfa82045..259065d271ef
> > 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> > @@ -163,7 +163,13 @@ static void plic_irq_eoi(struct irq_data *d)
> > {
> > struct plic_handler *handler = this_cpu_ptr(&plic_handlers);
> >
> > - writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM);
> > + if (irqd_irq_masked(d)) {
> > + plic_irq_unmask(d);
> > + writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM);
> > + plic_irq_mask(d);
> > + } else {
> > + writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM);
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > static struct irq_chip plic_chip = {
>
--
Best Regards
Guo Ren
ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/
On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 6:47 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Guo Ren <[email protected]>
>
> When using "devm_request_threaded_irq(,,,,IRQF_ONESHOT,,)" in the driver,
> only the first interrupt could be handled, and continue irq is blocked by
> hw. Because the riscv plic couldn't complete masked irq source which has
> been disabled in enable register. The bug was firstly reported in [1].
>
> Here is the description of Interrupt Completion in PLIC spec [2]:
>
> The PLIC signals it has completed executing an interrupt handler by
> writing the interrupt ID it received from the claim to the claim/complete
> register. The PLIC does not check whether the completion ID is the same
> as the last claim ID for that target. If the completion ID does not match
> an interrupt source that is currently enabled for the target, the
> ^^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^
> completion is silently ignored.
>
> [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/2021-July/007441.html
> [2] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-plic-spec/blob/8bc15a35d07c9edf7b5d23fec9728302595ffc4d/riscv-plic.adoc
>
> Reported-by: Vincent Pelletier <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <[email protected]>
> Cc: Anup Patel <[email protected]>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
> Cc: Atish Patra <[email protected]>
> Cc: Nikita Shubin <[email protected]>
> Cc: incent Pelletier <[email protected]>
Please include a Fixes: tag
Also, I see that you have dropped the DT bindings patch. We still
need separate compatible string for T-HEAD PLIC because OpenSBI
will use it for other work-arounds.
I suggest to include to more patches in this series:
1) Your latest T-HEAD PLIC DT bindings patch
2) Separate patch to use T-HEAD PLIC compatible in PLIC driver
Regards,
Anup
>
> ---
>
> Changes since V6:
> - Propagate to plic_irq_eoi for all riscv,plic by Nikita Shubin
> - Remove thead related codes
>
> Changes since V5:
> - Move back to mask/unmask
> - Fixup the problem in eoi callback
> - Remove allwinner,sun20i-d1 IRQCHIP_DECLARE
> - Rewrite comment log
>
> Changes since V4:
> - Update comment by Anup
>
> Changes since V3:
> - Rename "c9xx" to "c900"
> - Add sifive_plic_chip and thead_plic_chip for difference
>
> Changes since V2:
> - Add a separate compatible string "thead,c9xx-plic"
> - set irq_mask/unmask of "plic_chip" to NULL and point
> irq_enable/disable of "plic_chip" to plic_irq_mask/unmask
> - Add a detailed comment block in plic_init() about the
> differences in Claim/Completion process of RISC-V PLIC and C9xx
> PLIC.
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> index cf74cfa82045..259065d271ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> @@ -163,7 +163,13 @@ static void plic_irq_eoi(struct irq_data *d)
> {
> struct plic_handler *handler = this_cpu_ptr(&plic_handlers);
>
> - writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM);
> + if (irqd_irq_masked(d)) {
> + plic_irq_unmask(d);
> + writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM);
> + plic_irq_mask(d);
> + } else {
> + writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM);
> + }
> }
>
> static struct irq_chip plic_chip = {
> --
> 2.25.1
>
On Thu, 04 Nov 2021 14:40:42 +0000,
Anup Patel <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 6:47 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > From: Guo Ren <[email protected]>
> >
> > When using "devm_request_threaded_irq(,,,,IRQF_ONESHOT,,)" in the driver,
> > only the first interrupt could be handled, and continue irq is blocked by
> > hw. Because the riscv plic couldn't complete masked irq source which has
> > been disabled in enable register. The bug was firstly reported in [1].
> >
> > Here is the description of Interrupt Completion in PLIC spec [2]:
> >
> > The PLIC signals it has completed executing an interrupt handler by
> > writing the interrupt ID it received from the claim to the claim/complete
> > register. The PLIC does not check whether the completion ID is the same
> > as the last claim ID for that target. If the completion ID does not match
> > an interrupt source that is currently enabled for the target, the
> > ^^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^
> > completion is silently ignored.
> >
> > [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/2021-July/007441.html
> > [2] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-plic-spec/blob/8bc15a35d07c9edf7b5d23fec9728302595ffc4d/riscv-plic.adoc
> >
> > Reported-by: Vincent Pelletier <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Anup Patel <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Atish Patra <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Nikita Shubin <[email protected]>
> > Cc: incent Pelletier <[email protected]>
>
> Please include a Fixes: tag
>
> Also, I see that you have dropped the DT bindings patch. We still
> need separate compatible string for T-HEAD PLIC because OpenSBI
> will use it for other work-arounds.
>
> I suggest to include to more patches in this series:
> 1) Your latest T-HEAD PLIC DT bindings patch
> 2) Separate patch to use T-HEAD PLIC compatible in PLIC driver
No, please keep things separate. The PLIC is broken *today*, and I
want to take a patch for -rc1. The rest (compatible and such) is a new
feature and can wait until 5.17.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 10:57 PM Marc Zyngier <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 04 Nov 2021 14:40:42 +0000,
> Anup Patel <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 6:47 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Guo Ren <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > When using "devm_request_threaded_irq(,,,,IRQF_ONESHOT,,)" in the driver,
> > > only the first interrupt could be handled, and continue irq is blocked by
> > > hw. Because the riscv plic couldn't complete masked irq source which has
> > > been disabled in enable register. The bug was firstly reported in [1].
> > >
> > > Here is the description of Interrupt Completion in PLIC spec [2]:
> > >
> > > The PLIC signals it has completed executing an interrupt handler by
> > > writing the interrupt ID it received from the claim to the claim/complete
> > > register. The PLIC does not check whether the completion ID is the same
> > > as the last claim ID for that target. If the completion ID does not match
> > > an interrupt source that is currently enabled for the target, the
> > > ^^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^
> > > completion is silently ignored.
> > >
> > > [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/2021-July/007441.html
> > > [2] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-plic-spec/blob/8bc15a35d07c9edf7b5d23fec9728302595ffc4d/riscv-plic.adoc
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Vincent Pelletier <[email protected]>
> > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Anup Patel <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Atish Patra <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Nikita Shubin <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: incent Pelletier <[email protected]>
> >
> > Please include a Fixes: tag
Okay
> >
> > Also, I see that you have dropped the DT bindings patch. We still
> > need separate compatible string for T-HEAD PLIC because OpenSBI
> > will use it for other work-arounds.
> >
> > I suggest to include to more patches in this series:
> > 1) Your latest T-HEAD PLIC DT bindings patch
> > 2) Separate patch to use T-HEAD PLIC compatible in PLIC driver
Thx for the suggestion, and I would put above in 5.17 as Mark suggested.
>
> No, please keep things separate. The PLIC is broken *today*, and I
> want to take a patch for -rc1. The rest (compatible and such) is a new
> feature and can wait until 5.17.
Okay
>
> M.
>
> --
> Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
--
Best Regards
Guo Ren
ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/