From: Jisheng Zhang <[email protected]>
The type ex_handler_t is defined but not used, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm64/mm/extable.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/extable.c b/arch/arm64/mm/extable.c
index c3d53811a15e..c0181e60cc98 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/extable.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/extable.c
@@ -10,9 +10,6 @@
#include <asm/asm-extable.h>
#include <asm/ptrace.h>
-typedef bool (*ex_handler_t)(const struct exception_table_entry *,
- struct pt_regs *);
-
static inline unsigned long
get_ex_fixup(const struct exception_table_entry *ex)
{
--
2.33.0
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 08:02:49PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> From: Jisheng Zhang <[email protected]>
>
> The type ex_handler_t is defined but not used, remove it.
It's probably worth saying:
| The ex_handler_t type was introduced in commit:
|
| d6e2cc5647753825 ("arm64: extable: add `type` and `data` fields")
|
| ... but has never been used, and is unnecessary. Remove it.
... as this was a leftover from a prior version of that patch, and in
the form merged in mainline it was redundant becuase we moved to using
an enumerated type rather than a function pointer in the ex_table_entry.
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <[email protected]>
With or without the wording above:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Thanks,
Mark.
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/extable.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/extable.c b/arch/arm64/mm/extable.c
> index c3d53811a15e..c0181e60cc98 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/extable.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/extable.c
> @@ -10,9 +10,6 @@
> #include <asm/asm-extable.h>
> #include <asm/ptrace.h>
>
> -typedef bool (*ex_handler_t)(const struct exception_table_entry *,
> - struct pt_regs *);
> -
> static inline unsigned long
> get_ex_fixup(const struct exception_table_entry *ex)
> {
> --
> 2.33.0
>
>