2021-11-23 16:33:40

by Lucas Tanure

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 11/11] ACPI / scan: Create platform device for CLSA0100 ACPI nodes

The ACPI device with CLSA0100 is a sound card with multiple
instances of CS35L41.

We add an ID to the I2C multi instantiate list to enumerate
all I2C slaves correctly.

Signed-off-by: Lucas Tanure <[email protected]>
---
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 1 +
drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c | 7 +++++++
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index 2c80765670bc..16827a33e93b 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -1708,6 +1708,7 @@ static bool acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent(struct acpi_device *device)
{"BSG2150", },
{"INT33FE", },
{"INT3515", },
+ {"CLSA0100", },
{}
};

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c b/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c
index 4956a1df5b90..ed25a0adc656 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c
@@ -147,6 +147,12 @@ static const struct i2c_inst_data int3515_data[] = {
{}
};

+static const struct i2c_inst_data clsa0100_data[] = {
+ { "cs35l41-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO, 0 },
+ { "cs35l41-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO, 0 },
+ {}
+};
+
/*
* Note new device-ids must also be added to i2c_multi_instantiate_ids in
* drivers/acpi/scan.c: acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent().
@@ -155,6 +161,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id i2c_multi_inst_acpi_ids[] = {
{ "BSG1160", (unsigned long)bsg1160_data },
{ "BSG2150", (unsigned long)bsg2150_data },
{ "INT3515", (unsigned long)int3515_data },
+ { "CLSA0100", (unsigned long)clsa0100_data },
{ }
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, i2c_multi_inst_acpi_ids);
--
2.34.0



2021-11-23 17:05:48

by Hans de Goede

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] ACPI / scan: Create platform device for CLSA0100 ACPI nodes

Hi Lucas,

On 11/23/21 17:31, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> The ACPI device with CLSA0100 is a sound card with multiple
> instances of CS35L41.
>
> We add an ID to the I2C multi instantiate list to enumerate
> all I2C slaves correctly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Tanure <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 1 +
> drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index 2c80765670bc..16827a33e93b 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -1708,6 +1708,7 @@ static bool acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent(struct acpi_device *device)
> {"BSG2150", },
> {"INT33FE", },
> {"INT3515", },
> + {"CLSA0100", },
> {}
> };
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c b/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c
> index 4956a1df5b90..ed25a0adc656 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c
> @@ -147,6 +147,12 @@ static const struct i2c_inst_data int3515_data[] = {
> {}
> };
>
> +static const struct i2c_inst_data clsa0100_data[] = {
> + { "cs35l41-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO, 0 },
> + { "cs35l41-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO, 0 },

This suggests that both amplifiers are using the same GPIO pin as shared
IRQ, is that correct ? Can you share an acpidump of the laptop's DSDT tables ?

Regards,

Hans




> + {}
> +};
> +
> /*
> * Note new device-ids must also be added to i2c_multi_instantiate_ids in
> * drivers/acpi/scan.c: acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent().
> @@ -155,6 +161,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id i2c_multi_inst_acpi_ids[] = {
> { "BSG1160", (unsigned long)bsg1160_data },
> { "BSG2150", (unsigned long)bsg2150_data },
> { "INT3515", (unsigned long)int3515_data },
> + { "CLSA0100", (unsigned long)clsa0100_data },
> { }
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, i2c_multi_inst_acpi_ids);
>


2021-11-23 18:36:02

by Hans de Goede

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] ACPI / scan: Create platform device for CLSA0100 ACPI nodes

Hi,

On 11/23/21 18:11, Lucas tanure wrote:
> On 11/23/21 17:05, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi Lucas,
>>
>> On 11/23/21 17:31, Lucas Tanure wrote:
>>> The ACPI device with CLSA0100 is a sound card with multiple
>>> instances of CS35L41.
>>>
>>> We add an ID to the I2C multi instantiate list to enumerate
>>> all I2C slaves correctly.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lucas Tanure <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/acpi/scan.c                          | 1 +
>>>   drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c | 7 +++++++
>>>   2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
>>> index 2c80765670bc..16827a33e93b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
>>> @@ -1708,6 +1708,7 @@ static bool acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent(struct acpi_device *device)
>>>           {"BSG2150", },
>>>           {"INT33FE", },
>>>           {"INT3515", },
>>> +        {"CLSA0100", },
>>>           {}
>>>       };
>>>   diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c b/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c
>>> index 4956a1df5b90..ed25a0adc656 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c
>>> @@ -147,6 +147,12 @@ static const struct i2c_inst_data int3515_data[]  = {
>>>       {}
>>>   };
>>>   +static const struct i2c_inst_data clsa0100_data[]  = {
>>> +    { "cs35l41-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO, 0 },
>>> +    { "cs35l41-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO, 0 },
>>
>> This suggests that both amplifiers are using the same GPIO pin as shared
>> IRQ, is that correct ? Can you share an acpidump of the laptop's DSDT tables ?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hans
>>
>
> DSDT attached.
> Yes, both amps share the same IRQ gpio.

Thanks, this patch looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>

Regards,

Hans




>
>>
>>
>>
>>> +    {}
>>> +};
>>> +
>>>   /*
>>>    * Note new device-ids must also be added to i2c_multi_instantiate_ids in
>>>    * drivers/acpi/scan.c: acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent().
>>> @@ -155,6 +161,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id i2c_multi_inst_acpi_ids[] = {
>>>       { "BSG1160", (unsigned long)bsg1160_data },
>>>       { "BSG2150", (unsigned long)bsg2150_data },
>>>       { "INT3515", (unsigned long)int3515_data },
>>> +    { "CLSA0100", (unsigned long)clsa0100_data },
>>>       { }
>>>   };
>>>   MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, i2c_multi_inst_acpi_ids);
>>>
>>


2021-11-23 23:02:02

by Andy Shevchenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] ACPI / scan: Create platform device for CLSA0100 ACPI nodes

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 8:36 PM Hans de Goede <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 11/23/21 18:11, Lucas tanure wrote:
> > On 11/23/21 17:05, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> On 11/23/21 17:31, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> >>> The ACPI device with CLSA0100 is a sound card with multiple
> >>> instances of CS35L41.
> >>>
> >>> We add an ID to the I2C multi instantiate list to enumerate
> >>> all I2C slaves correctly.

...

> >>> @@ -1708,6 +1708,7 @@ static bool acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent(struct acpi_device *device)
> >>> {"BSG2150", },
> >>> {"INT33FE", },
> >>> {"INT3515", },


> >>> + {"CLSA0100", },

Can we keep it sorted, please?
Ditto for the other driver.

> >>> {}

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

2021-11-23 17:13:09

by Lucas Tanure

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] ACPI / scan: Create platform device for CLSA0100 ACPI nodes

On 11/23/21 17:05, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> On 11/23/21 17:31, Lucas Tanure wrote:
>> The ACPI device with CLSA0100 is a sound card with multiple
>> instances of CS35L41.
>>
>> We add an ID to the I2C multi instantiate list to enumerate
>> all I2C slaves correctly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lucas Tanure <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 1 +
>> drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c | 7 +++++++
>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
>> index 2c80765670bc..16827a33e93b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
>> @@ -1708,6 +1708,7 @@ static bool acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent(struct acpi_device *device)
>> {"BSG2150", },
>> {"INT33FE", },
>> {"INT3515", },
>> + {"CLSA0100", },
>> {}
>> };
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c b/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c
>> index 4956a1df5b90..ed25a0adc656 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c
>> @@ -147,6 +147,12 @@ static const struct i2c_inst_data int3515_data[] = {
>> {}
>> };
>>
>> +static const struct i2c_inst_data clsa0100_data[] = {
>> + { "cs35l41-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO, 0 },
>> + { "cs35l41-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO, 0 },
>
> This suggests that both amplifiers are using the same GPIO pin as shared
> IRQ, is that correct ? Can you share an acpidump of the laptop's DSDT tables ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>

DSDT attached.
Yes, both amps share the same IRQ gpio.

>
>
>
>> + {}
>> +};
>> +
>> /*
>> * Note new device-ids must also be added to i2c_multi_instantiate_ids in
>> * drivers/acpi/scan.c: acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent().
>> @@ -155,6 +161,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id i2c_multi_inst_acpi_ids[] = {
>> { "BSG1160", (unsigned long)bsg1160_data },
>> { "BSG2150", (unsigned long)bsg2150_data },
>> { "INT3515", (unsigned long)int3515_data },
>> + { "CLSA0100", (unsigned long)clsa0100_data },
>> { }
>> };
>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, i2c_multi_inst_acpi_ids);
>>
>


Attachments:
dsdt.dsl (1.10 MB)