2021-12-14 12:59:10

by Andy Shevchenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] pinctrl: Propagate firmware node from a parent device

When creating MFD platform devices the firmware node is left unset.
This, in particular, prevents GPIO library to use it for different
purposes. Propagate firmware node from the parent device and let
GPIO library do the right thing.

While at it, slightly modify the headers to reflect the usage of APIs.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
---
v2: fixed compilation bug (LKP), due to above reshuffle headers in the rest
drivers/pinctrl/cirrus/pinctrl-madera-core.c | 5 ++++-
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-as3722.c | 13 +++++++------
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-da9062.c | 6 +++---
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-max77620.c | 10 ++++++----
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rk805.c | 12 ++++++------
5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/cirrus/pinctrl-madera-core.c b/drivers/pinctrl/cirrus/pinctrl-madera-core.c
index dce2626384a9..e1cfbee3643a 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/cirrus/pinctrl-madera-core.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/cirrus/pinctrl-madera-core.c
@@ -8,8 +8,10 @@
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/property.h>
#include <linux/regmap.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
+
#include <linux/pinctrl/machine.h>
#include <linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h>
#include <linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h>
@@ -1004,13 +1006,14 @@ static int madera_pin_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "%s\n", __func__);

+ device_set_node(&pdev->dev, dev_fwnode(pdev->dev.parent));
+
priv = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!priv)
return -ENOMEM;

priv->dev = &pdev->dev;
priv->madera = madera;
- pdev->dev.of_node = madera->dev->of_node;

switch (madera->type) {
case CS47L15:
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-as3722.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-as3722.c
index 13c193156363..5a175e3d7439 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-as3722.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-as3722.c
@@ -23,19 +23,20 @@
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/mod_device_table.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/mfd/as3722.h>
-#include <linux/of.h>
-#include <linux/of_device.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/pm.h>
+#include <linux/property.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+
#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
#include <linux/pinctrl/machine.h>
#include <linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h>
#include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.h>
#include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf.h>
#include <linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h>
-#include <linux/pm.h>
-#include <linux/slab.h>

#include "core.h"
#include "pinconf.h"
@@ -551,12 +552,13 @@ static int as3722_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct as3722_pctrl_info *as_pci;
int ret;

+ device_set_node(&pdev->dev, dev_fwnode(pdev->dev.parent));
+
as_pci = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*as_pci), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!as_pci)
return -ENOMEM;

as_pci->dev = &pdev->dev;
- as_pci->dev->of_node = pdev->dev.parent->of_node;
as_pci->as3722 = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, as_pci);

@@ -578,7 +580,6 @@ static int as3722_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

as_pci->gpio_chip = as3722_gpio_chip;
as_pci->gpio_chip.parent = &pdev->dev;
- as_pci->gpio_chip.of_node = pdev->dev.parent->of_node;
ret = gpiochip_add_data(&as_pci->gpio_chip, as_pci);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Couldn't register gpiochip, %d\n", ret);
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-da9062.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-da9062.c
index 1c08579f0198..0e0ac3f3ffef 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-da9062.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-da9062.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include <linux/bits.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/property.h>
#include <linux/regmap.h>

#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
@@ -256,6 +257,8 @@ static int da9062_pctl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct da9062_pctl *pctl;
int i;

+ device_set_node(&pdev->dev, dev_fwnode(pdev->dev.parent));
+
pctl = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pctl), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!pctl)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -277,9 +280,6 @@ static int da9062_pctl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
pctl->gc = reference_gc;
pctl->gc.label = dev_name(&pdev->dev);
pctl->gc.parent = &pdev->dev;
-#ifdef CONFIG_OF_GPIO
- pctl->gc.of_node = parent->of_node;
-#endif

platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pctl);

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-max77620.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-max77620.c
index c643ed43ebbf..132987340637 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-max77620.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-max77620.c
@@ -11,13 +11,14 @@

#include <linux/mfd/max77620.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
-#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/property.h>
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+
#include <linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h>
#include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.h>
#include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf.h>
#include <linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h>
-#include <linux/platform_device.h>
-#include <linux/regmap.h>

#include "core.h"
#include "pinconf.h"
@@ -551,12 +552,13 @@ static int max77620_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct max77620_pctrl_info *mpci;
int i;

+ device_set_node(&pdev->dev, dev_fwnode(pdev->dev.parent));
+
mpci = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*mpci), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!mpci)
return -ENOMEM;

mpci->dev = &pdev->dev;
- mpci->dev->of_node = pdev->dev.parent->of_node;
mpci->rmap = max77620->rmap;

mpci->pins = max77620_pins_desc;
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rk805.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rk805.c
index c6f4229eb106..7c1f7408fb9a 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rk805.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rk805.c
@@ -13,17 +13,17 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/mfd/rk808.h>
-#include <linux/of.h>
-#include <linux/of_device.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/pm.h>
+#include <linux/property.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+
#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
#include <linux/pinctrl/machine.h>
#include <linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h>
#include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.h>
#include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf.h>
#include <linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h>
-#include <linux/pm.h>
-#include <linux/slab.h>

#include "core.h"
#include "pinconf.h"
@@ -420,18 +420,18 @@ static int rk805_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct rk805_pctrl_info *pci;
int ret;

+ device_set_node(&pdev->dev, dev_fwnode(pdev->dev.parent));
+
pci = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pci), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!pci)
return -ENOMEM;

pci->dev = &pdev->dev;
- pci->dev->of_node = pdev->dev.parent->of_node;
pci->rk808 = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);

pci->pinctrl_desc = rk805_pinctrl_desc;
pci->gpio_chip = rk805_gpio_chip;
pci->gpio_chip.parent = &pdev->dev;
- pci->gpio_chip.of_node = pdev->dev.parent->of_node;

platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pci);

--
2.33.0



2021-12-14 13:38:02

by Andy Shevchenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] pinctrl: Propagate firmware node from a parent device

On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 02:58:55PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> When creating MFD platform devices the firmware node is left unset.
> This, in particular, prevents GPIO library to use it for different
> purposes. Propagate firmware node from the parent device and let
> GPIO library do the right thing.
>
> While at it, slightly modify the headers to reflect the usage of APIs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
> ---
> v2: fixed compilation bug (LKP), due to above reshuffle headers in the rest

...

> +#include <linux/mod_device_table.h>

He-h, updated code, updated bugs...

Linus, can you, please, apply the first patch if you have no objections, so I
won't spam a lot of people again with no changes beneath?

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



2021-12-14 16:38:36

by Colin Foster

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] pinctrl: Propagate firmware node from a parent device

On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 02:58:55PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> When creating MFD platform devices the firmware node is left unset.
> This, in particular, prevents GPIO library to use it for different
> purposes. Propagate firmware node from the parent device and let
> GPIO library do the right thing.
>

I came across the same thing this week. By populating the of_compatible
field of the mfd_cell, the child device will have the appropriate
firmware node populated. Unfortunately that currently means that I'll
have to put every device type in the MFD instead of in an of_match_table
in the child driver itself. Figuring that out is one of the next things
on my list.