The process's VMAs can be mapped by hugetlb page, but now the DAMON
did not implement the access checking for hugetlb pte, so we can not
get the actual access count like below if a process VMAs were mapped
by hugetlb.
damon_aggregated: target_id=18446614368406014464
nr_regions=12 4194304-5476352: 0 545
damon_aggregated: target_id=18446614368406014464
nr_regions=12 140662370467840-140662372970496: 0 545
damon_aggregated: target_id=18446614368406014464
nr_regions=12 140662372970496-140662375460864: 0 545
damon_aggregated: target_id=18446614368406014464
nr_regions=12 140662375460864-140662377951232: 0 545
damon_aggregated: target_id=18446614368406014464
nr_regions=12 140662377951232-140662380449792: 0 545
damon_aggregated: target_id=18446614368406014464
nr_regions=12 140662380449792-140662382944256: 0 545
......
Thus this patch adds hugetlb access checking support, with this patch
we can see below VMA mapped by hugetlb access count.
damon_aggregated: target_id=18446613056935405824
nr_regions=12 140296486649856-140296489914368: 1 3
damon_aggregated: target_id=18446613056935405824
nr_regions=12 140296489914368-140296492978176: 1 3
damon_aggregated: target_id=18446613056935405824
nr_regions=12 140296492978176-140296495439872: 1 3
damon_aggregated: target_id=18446613056935405824
nr_regions=12 140296495439872-140296498311168: 1 3
damon_aggregated: target_id=18446613056935405824
nr_regions=12 140296498311168-140296501198848: 1 3
damon_aggregated: target_id=18446613056935405824
nr_regions=12 140296501198848-140296504320000: 1 3
damon_aggregated: target_id=18446613056935405824
nr_regions=12 140296504320000-140296507568128: 1 2
......
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <[email protected]>
---
Changes from v1:
- Move damon_hugetlb_mkold() to vaddr.c file.
- Move some assignments in the variables definitions.
---
mm/damon/vaddr.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 96 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/damon/vaddr.c b/mm/damon/vaddr.c
index 78ff2bc..69c436b 100644
--- a/mm/damon/vaddr.c
+++ b/mm/damon/vaddr.c
@@ -386,8 +386,65 @@ static int damon_mkold_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
return 0;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
+static void damon_hugetlb_mkold(pte_t *pte, struct mm_struct *mm,
+ struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
+{
+ bool referenced = false;
+ struct hstate *h = hstate_vma(vma);
+ pte_t entry = huge_ptep_get(pte);
+ struct page *page = pte_page(entry);
+
+ if (!page)
+ return;
+
+ get_page(page);
+
+ if (pte_young(entry)) {
+ referenced = true;
+ entry = pte_mkold(entry);
+ huge_ptep_set_access_flags(vma, addr, pte, entry,
+ vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE);
+ }
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER
+ if (mmu_notifier_clear_young(mm, addr, addr + huge_page_size(h)))
+ referenced = true;
+#endif /* CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER */
+
+ if (referenced)
+ set_page_young(page);
+
+ set_page_idle(page);
+ put_page(page);
+}
+
+static int damon_mkold_hugetlb_entry(pte_t *pte, unsigned long hmask,
+ unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
+ struct mm_walk *walk)
+{
+ struct hstate *h = hstate_vma(walk->vma);
+ spinlock_t *ptl;
+ pte_t entry;
+
+ ptl = huge_pte_lock(h, walk->mm, pte);
+ entry = huge_ptep_get(pte);
+ if (!pte_present(entry))
+ goto out;
+
+ damon_hugetlb_mkold(pte, walk->mm, walk->vma, addr);
+
+out:
+ spin_unlock(ptl);
+ return 0;
+}
+#else
+#define damon_mkold_hugetlb_entry NULL
+#endif
+
static const struct mm_walk_ops damon_mkold_ops = {
.pmd_entry = damon_mkold_pmd_entry,
+ .hugetlb_entry = damon_mkold_hugetlb_entry,
};
static void damon_va_mkold(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
@@ -482,8 +539,47 @@ static int damon_young_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
return 0;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
+static int damon_young_hugetlb_entry(pte_t *pte, unsigned long hmask,
+ unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
+ struct mm_walk *walk)
+{
+ struct damon_young_walk_private *priv = walk->private;
+ struct hstate *h = hstate_vma(walk->vma);
+ struct page *page;
+ spinlock_t *ptl;
+ pte_t entry;
+
+ ptl = huge_pte_lock(h, walk->mm, pte);
+ entry = huge_ptep_get(pte);
+ if (!pte_present(entry))
+ goto out;
+
+ page = pte_page(entry);
+ if (!page)
+ goto out;
+
+ get_page(page);
+
+ if (pte_young(entry) || !page_is_idle(page) ||
+ mmu_notifier_test_young(walk->mm, addr)) {
+ *priv->page_sz = huge_page_size(h);
+ priv->young = true;
+ }
+
+ put_page(page);
+
+out:
+ spin_unlock(ptl);
+ return 0;
+}
+#else
+#define damon_young_hugetlb_entry NULL
+#endif
+
static const struct mm_walk_ops damon_young_ops = {
.pmd_entry = damon_young_pmd_entry,
+ .hugetlb_entry = damon_young_hugetlb_entry,
};
static bool damon_va_young(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
--
1.8.3.1
Hi Baolin,
Basically, the code looks ok to me. I left so trivial cosmetic nitpicks below,
though.
On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 18:38:03 +0800 Baolin Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
> The process's VMAs can be mapped by hugetlb page, but now the DAMON
> did not implement the access checking for hugetlb pte, so we can not
> get the actual access count like below if a process VMAs were mapped
> by hugetlb.
>
> damon_aggregated: target_id=18446614368406014464
> nr_regions=12 4194304-5476352: 0 545
> damon_aggregated: target_id=18446614368406014464
> nr_regions=12 140662370467840-140662372970496: 0 545
> damon_aggregated: target_id=18446614368406014464
> nr_regions=12 140662372970496-140662375460864: 0 545
> damon_aggregated: target_id=18446614368406014464
> nr_regions=12 140662375460864-140662377951232: 0 545
> damon_aggregated: target_id=18446614368406014464
> nr_regions=12 140662377951232-140662380449792: 0 545
> damon_aggregated: target_id=18446614368406014464
> nr_regions=12 140662380449792-140662382944256: 0 545
> ......
I'd prefer indenting the program output with 4 spaces and not wrapping it.
e.g.,
damon_aggregated: target_id=18446614368406014464 nr_regions=12 4194304-5476352: 0 545
damon_aggregated: target_id=18446614368406014464 nr_regions=12 140662370467840-140662372970496: 0 545
>
> Thus this patch adds hugetlb access checking support, with this patch
> we can see below VMA mapped by hugetlb access count.
>
> damon_aggregated: target_id=18446613056935405824
> nr_regions=12 140296486649856-140296489914368: 1 3
> damon_aggregated: target_id=18446613056935405824
> nr_regions=12 140296489914368-140296492978176: 1 3
> damon_aggregated: target_id=18446613056935405824
> nr_regions=12 140296492978176-140296495439872: 1 3
> damon_aggregated: target_id=18446613056935405824
> nr_regions=12 140296495439872-140296498311168: 1 3
> damon_aggregated: target_id=18446613056935405824
> nr_regions=12 140296498311168-140296501198848: 1 3
> damon_aggregated: target_id=18446613056935405824
> nr_regions=12 140296501198848-140296504320000: 1 3
> damon_aggregated: target_id=18446613056935405824
> nr_regions=12 140296504320000-140296507568128: 1 2
> ......
ditto.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <[email protected]>
> ---
> Changes from v1:
> - Move damon_hugetlb_mkold() to vaddr.c file.
> - Move some assignments in the variables definitions.
> ---
> mm/damon/vaddr.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 96 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/damon/vaddr.c b/mm/damon/vaddr.c
> index 78ff2bc..69c436b 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/vaddr.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/vaddr.c
> @@ -386,8 +386,65 @@ static int damon_mkold_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
> +static void damon_hugetlb_mkold(pte_t *pte, struct mm_struct *mm,
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
> +{
> + bool referenced = false;
> + struct hstate *h = hstate_vma(vma);
> + pte_t entry = huge_ptep_get(pte);
> + struct page *page = pte_page(entry);
> +
> + if (!page)
> + return;
> +
> + get_page(page);
> +
> + if (pte_young(entry)) {
> + referenced = true;
> + entry = pte_mkold(entry);
> + huge_ptep_set_access_flags(vma, addr, pte, entry,
> + vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE);
> + }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER
> + if (mmu_notifier_clear_young(mm, addr, addr + huge_page_size(h)))
> + referenced = true;
> +#endif /* CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER */
> +
> + if (referenced)
> + set_page_young(page);
> +
> + set_page_idle(page);
> + put_page(page);
> +}
> +
> +static int damon_mkold_hugetlb_entry(pte_t *pte, unsigned long hmask,
> + unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> + struct mm_walk *walk)
> +{
> + struct hstate *h = hstate_vma(walk->vma);
> + spinlock_t *ptl;
> + pte_t entry;
> +
> + ptl = huge_pte_lock(h, walk->mm, pte);
> + entry = huge_ptep_get(pte);
> + if (!pte_present(entry))
> + goto out;
> +
> + damon_hugetlb_mkold(pte, walk->mm, walk->vma, addr);
> +
> +out:
> + spin_unlock(ptl);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#else
> +#define damon_mkold_hugetlb_entry NULL
> +#endif
Could we append a comment saying this #endif is for #ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE,
like below?
#endif /* CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE */
> +
> static const struct mm_walk_ops damon_mkold_ops = {
> .pmd_entry = damon_mkold_pmd_entry,
> + .hugetlb_entry = damon_mkold_hugetlb_entry,
> };
>
> static void damon_va_mkold(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
> @@ -482,8 +539,47 @@ static int damon_young_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
> +static int damon_young_hugetlb_entry(pte_t *pte, unsigned long hmask,
> + unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> + struct mm_walk *walk)
> +{
> + struct damon_young_walk_private *priv = walk->private;
> + struct hstate *h = hstate_vma(walk->vma);
> + struct page *page;
> + spinlock_t *ptl;
> + pte_t entry;
> +
> + ptl = huge_pte_lock(h, walk->mm, pte);
> + entry = huge_ptep_get(pte);
> + if (!pte_present(entry))
> + goto out;
> +
> + page = pte_page(entry);
> + if (!page)
> + goto out;
> +
> + get_page(page);
> +
> + if (pte_young(entry) || !page_is_idle(page) ||
> + mmu_notifier_test_young(walk->mm, addr)) {
> + *priv->page_sz = huge_page_size(h);
> + priv->young = true;
> + }
> +
> + put_page(page);
> +
> +out:
> + spin_unlock(ptl);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#else
> +#define damon_young_hugetlb_entry NULL
> +#endif
ditto.
> +
> static const struct mm_walk_ops damon_young_ops = {
> .pmd_entry = damon_young_pmd_entry,
> + .hugetlb_entry = damon_young_hugetlb_entry,
> };
>
> static bool damon_va_young(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> --
> 1.8.3.1
On 12/22/2021 5:10 PM, SeongJae Park wrote:
> Hi Baolin,
>
>
> Basically, the code looks ok to me. I left so trivial cosmetic nitpicks below,
> though.
>
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 18:38:03 +0800 Baolin Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> The process's VMAs can be mapped by hugetlb page, but now the DAMON
>> did not implement the access checking for hugetlb pte, so we can not
>> get the actual access count like below if a process VMAs were mapped
>> by hugetlb.
>>
>> damon_aggregated: target_id=18446614368406014464
>> nr_regions=12 4194304-5476352: 0 545
>> damon_aggregated: target_id=18446614368406014464
>> nr_regions=12 140662370467840-140662372970496: 0 545
>> damon_aggregated: target_id=18446614368406014464
>> nr_regions=12 140662372970496-140662375460864: 0 545
>> damon_aggregated: target_id=18446614368406014464
>> nr_regions=12 140662375460864-140662377951232: 0 545
>> damon_aggregated: target_id=18446614368406014464
>> nr_regions=12 140662377951232-140662380449792: 0 545
>> damon_aggregated: target_id=18446614368406014464
>> nr_regions=12 140662380449792-140662382944256: 0 545
>> ......
>
> I'd prefer indenting the program output with 4 spaces and not wrapping it.
> e.g.,
>
> damon_aggregated: target_id=18446614368406014464 nr_regions=12 4194304-5476352: 0 545
> damon_aggregated: target_id=18446614368406014464 nr_regions=12 140662370467840-140662372970496: 0 545
Sure.
>>
>> Thus this patch adds hugetlb access checking support, with this patch
>> we can see below VMA mapped by hugetlb access count.
>>
>> damon_aggregated: target_id=18446613056935405824
>> nr_regions=12 140296486649856-140296489914368: 1 3
>> damon_aggregated: target_id=18446613056935405824
>> nr_regions=12 140296489914368-140296492978176: 1 3
>> damon_aggregated: target_id=18446613056935405824
>> nr_regions=12 140296492978176-140296495439872: 1 3
>> damon_aggregated: target_id=18446613056935405824
>> nr_regions=12 140296495439872-140296498311168: 1 3
>> damon_aggregated: target_id=18446613056935405824
>> nr_regions=12 140296498311168-140296501198848: 1 3
>> damon_aggregated: target_id=18446613056935405824
>> nr_regions=12 140296501198848-140296504320000: 1 3
>> damon_aggregated: target_id=18446613056935405824
>> nr_regions=12 140296504320000-140296507568128: 1 2
>> ......
>
> ditto.
Sure.
>> +static int damon_mkold_hugetlb_entry(pte_t *pte, unsigned long hmask,
>> + unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
>> + struct mm_walk *walk)
>> +{
>> + struct hstate *h = hstate_vma(walk->vma);
>> + spinlock_t *ptl;
>> + pte_t entry;
>> +
>> + ptl = huge_pte_lock(h, walk->mm, pte);
>> + entry = huge_ptep_get(pte);
>> + if (!pte_present(entry))
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + damon_hugetlb_mkold(pte, walk->mm, walk->vma, addr);
>> +
>> +out:
>> + spin_unlock(ptl);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +#else
>> +#define damon_mkold_hugetlb_entry NULL
>> +#endif
>
> Could we append a comment saying this #endif is for #ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE,
> like below?
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE */
Sure.
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
>> +static int damon_young_hugetlb_entry(pte_t *pte, unsigned long hmask,
>> + unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
>> + struct mm_walk *walk)
>> +{
>> + struct damon_young_walk_private *priv = walk->private;
>> + struct hstate *h = hstate_vma(walk->vma);
>> + struct page *page;
>> + spinlock_t *ptl;
>> + pte_t entry;
>> +
>> + ptl = huge_pte_lock(h, walk->mm, pte);
>> + entry = huge_ptep_get(pte);
>> + if (!pte_present(entry))
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + page = pte_page(entry);
>> + if (!page)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + get_page(page);
>> +
>> + if (pte_young(entry) || !page_is_idle(page) ||
>> + mmu_notifier_test_young(walk->mm, addr)) {
>> + *priv->page_sz = huge_page_size(h);
>> + priv->young = true;
>> + }
>> +
>> + put_page(page);
>> +
>> +out:
>> + spin_unlock(ptl);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +#else
>> +#define damon_young_hugetlb_entry NULL
>> +#endif
>
> ditto.
Sure.
But I saw Andrew had applied this version into his branch.
Andrew, would you like me to send a new version? or an increment patch
to fix the coding style issue? Thanks.