This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.175 release.
There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.175-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Linux 5.4.175-rc1
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
select: Fix indefinitely sleeping task in poll_schedule_timeout()
Tim Harvey <[email protected]>
mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: disable CMDQ support
Phil Elwell <[email protected]>
ARM: dts: gpio-ranges property is now required
Phil Elwell <[email protected]>
pinctrl: bcm2835: Change init order for gpio hogs
Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
pinctrl: bcm2835: Add support for wake-up interrupts
Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
pinctrl: bcm2835: Match BCM7211 compatible string
Stefan Wahren <[email protected]>
pinctrl: bcm2835: Add support for all GPIOs on BCM2711
Stefan Wahren <[email protected]>
pinctrl: bcm2835: Refactor platform data
Stefan Wahren <[email protected]>
pinctrl: bcm2835: Drop unused define
Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
rcu: Tighten rcu_advance_cbs_nowake() checks
Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
drm/i915: Flush TLBs before releasing backing store
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +-
arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h | 3 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c | 10 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c | 99 +++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h | 2 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h | 2 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 11 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c | 4 +
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 3 +-
drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c | 209 +++++++++++++++++++----
fs/select.c | 63 +++----
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 7 +-
13 files changed, 346 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
On 1/27/2022 10:09 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.175 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.175-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
--
Florian
On 1/27/22 11:09 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.175 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.175-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
thanks,
-- Shuah
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 23:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.175 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.175-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email protected]>
## Build
* kernel: 5.4.175-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git branch: linux-5.4.y
* git commit: aa3124a3444fd7cfa588271ffdc7d3cb77131142
* git describe: v5.4.174-12-gaa3124a3444f
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.174-12-gaa3124a3444f
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.4.173-317-gb9fb58c8fa63)
No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.4.173-317-gb9fb58c8fa63)
No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.4.173-317-gb9fb58c8fa63)
No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.4.173-317-gb9fb58c8fa63)
No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary
total: 60336, pass: 50071, fail: 423, skip: 9268, xfail: 574
## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 258 total, 258 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 36 total, 31 passed, 5 failed
* dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 20 total, 20 passed, 0 failed
* juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 52 total, 48 passed, 4 failed
* riscv: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:09:01PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.175 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 65 configs -> no new failure
arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 107 configs -> no new failure
arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 2 configs -> no failure
x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/665
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <[email protected]>
--
Regards
Sudip
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:09:01PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.175 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 157 pass: 157 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 449 pass: 449 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Guenter