Trivial patches.
No functional change inteded.
Shubhrajyoti Datta (2):
clk: zynq: trivial warning fix
clk: zynq: Update the parameters to zynq_clk_register_periph_clk
drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c | 13 +++++++------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--
2.17.1
Fix the below warning
WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
+ int enable = !!(fclk_enable & BIT(i - fclk0));
+ zynq_clk_register_fclk(i, clk_output_name[i],
Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti Datta <[email protected]>
---
drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c b/drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c
index 204b83d911b9..434511dcf5cb 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c
@@ -349,6 +349,7 @@ static void __init zynq_clk_setup(struct device_node *np)
/* Peripheral clocks */
for (i = fclk0; i <= fclk3; i++) {
int enable = !!(fclk_enable & BIT(i - fclk0));
+
zynq_clk_register_fclk(i, clk_output_name[i],
SLCR_FPGA0_CLK_CTRL + 0x10 * (i - fclk0),
periph_parents, enable);
--
2.17.1
In case there are only one gate or the two_gate is 0 the clk1 clock
passed is not used. We are passing 0 which is arm_pll.
Pass a invalid clock instead.
Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti Datta <[email protected]>
---
drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c b/drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c
index 434511dcf5cb..7bdeaff2bfd6 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c
@@ -355,14 +355,14 @@ static void __init zynq_clk_setup(struct device_node *np)
periph_parents, enable);
}
- zynq_clk_register_periph_clk(lqspi, 0, clk_output_name[lqspi], NULL,
- SLCR_LQSPI_CLK_CTRL, periph_parents, 0);
+ zynq_clk_register_periph_clk(lqspi, clk_max, clk_output_name[lqspi], NULL,
+ SLCR_LQSPI_CLK_CTRL, periph_parents, 0);
- zynq_clk_register_periph_clk(smc, 0, clk_output_name[smc], NULL,
- SLCR_SMC_CLK_CTRL, periph_parents, 0);
+ zynq_clk_register_periph_clk(smc, clk_max, clk_output_name[smc], NULL,
+ SLCR_SMC_CLK_CTRL, periph_parents, 0);
- zynq_clk_register_periph_clk(pcap, 0, clk_output_name[pcap], NULL,
- SLCR_PCAP_CLK_CTRL, periph_parents, 0);
+ zynq_clk_register_periph_clk(pcap, clk_max, clk_output_name[pcap], NULL,
+ SLCR_PCAP_CLK_CTRL, periph_parents, 0);
zynq_clk_register_periph_clk(sdio0, sdio1, clk_output_name[sdio0],
clk_output_name[sdio1], SLCR_SDIO_CLK_CTRL,
--
2.17.1
Quoting Shubhrajyoti Datta (2022-02-22 05:09:03)
> In case there are only one gate or the two_gate is 0 the clk1 clock
> passed is not used. We are passing 0 which is arm_pll.
> Pass a invalid clock instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti Datta <[email protected]>
> ---
Applied to clk-next
Quoting Shubhrajyoti Datta (2022-02-22 05:09:02)
> Fix the below warning
>
> WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
> + int enable = !!(fclk_enable & BIT(i - fclk0));
> + zynq_clk_register_fclk(i, clk_output_name[i],
>
> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti Datta <[email protected]>
> ---
Applied to clk-next