On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 03:39:49PM +0800, Jiasheng Jiang wrote:
> As the potential failure of the clk_enable(),
> it should be better to check it and return error
> if fails.
> - clk_enable(clock->xck);
> - clk_enable(clock->ick);
> - clk_enable(clock->div);
> + ret = clk_enable(clock->xck);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err;
> + ret = clk_enable(clock->ick);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err;
> + ret = clk_enable(clock->div);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err;
>
> clock->count++;
> }
>
> return ret;
> +
> +err:
> + clk_disable(clock->xck);
> + clk_disable(clock->ick);
> + clk_disable(clock->div);
You need separate labels for each enable so that we don't end up
disabling clocks we didn't enable, that would also be a bug.
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 08:44:12PM +0800, Mark Brown wrote:
>> +err:
>> + clk_disable(clock->xck);
>> + clk_disable(clock->ick);
>> + clk_disable(clock->div);
>
> You need separate labels for each enable so that we don't end up
> disabling clocks we didn't enable, that would also be a bug.
Thanks, I have submitted a v2 to fix it.
Jiang