2022-03-25 17:24:17

by Jakob Koschel

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] ocfs2: replace usage of found with dedicated list iterator variable

To move the list iterator variable into the list_for_each_entry_*()
macro in the future it should be avoided to use the list iterator
variable after the loop body.

To *never* use the list iterator variable after the loop it was
concluded to use a separate iterator variable instead of a
found boolean [1].

This removes the need to use a found variable and simply checking if
the variable was set, can determine if the break/goto was hit.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgRr_D8CB-D9Kg-c=EHreAsk5SqXPwr9Y7k9sA6cWXJ6w@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <[email protected]>
---
fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmunlock.c | 21 ++++++++++-----------
fs/ocfs2/quota_local.c | 10 +++++-----
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmunlock.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmunlock.c
index 61103b2d69fb..7318e4794ef9 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmunlock.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmunlock.c
@@ -392,9 +392,9 @@ int dlm_unlock_lock_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data,
struct dlm_ctxt *dlm = data;
struct dlm_unlock_lock *unlock = (struct dlm_unlock_lock *)msg->buf;
struct dlm_lock_resource *res = NULL;
- struct dlm_lock *lock = NULL;
+ struct dlm_lock *lock = NULL, *iter;
enum dlm_status status = DLM_NORMAL;
- int found = 0, i;
+ int i;
struct dlm_lockstatus *lksb = NULL;
int ignore;
u32 flags;
@@ -437,7 +437,6 @@ int dlm_unlock_lock_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data,
}

queue=&res->granted;
- found = 0;
spin_lock(&res->spinlock);
if (res->state & DLM_LOCK_RES_RECOVERING) {
spin_unlock(&res->spinlock);
@@ -461,21 +460,21 @@ int dlm_unlock_lock_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data,
}

for (i=0; i<3; i++) {
- list_for_each_entry(lock, queue, list) {
- if (lock->ml.cookie == unlock->cookie &&
- lock->ml.node == unlock->node_idx) {
- dlm_lock_get(lock);
- found = 1;
+ list_for_each_entry(iter, queue, list) {
+ if (iter->ml.cookie == unlock->cookie &&
+ iter->ml.node == unlock->node_idx) {
+ dlm_lock_get(iter);
+ lock = iter;
break;
}
}
- if (found)
+ if (lock)
break;
/* scan granted -> converting -> blocked queues */
queue++;
}
spin_unlock(&res->spinlock);
- if (!found) {
+ if (!lock) {
status = DLM_IVLOCKID;
goto not_found;
}
@@ -505,7 +504,7 @@ int dlm_unlock_lock_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data,
dlm_kick_thread(dlm, res);

not_found:
- if (!found)
+ if (!lock)
mlog(ML_ERROR, "failed to find lock to unlock! "
"cookie=%u:%llu\n",
dlm_get_lock_cookie_node(be64_to_cpu(unlock->cookie)),
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/quota_local.c b/fs/ocfs2/quota_local.c
index 0e4b16d4c037..38cc75bd3127 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/quota_local.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/quota_local.c
@@ -923,19 +923,19 @@ static struct ocfs2_quota_chunk *ocfs2_find_free_entry(struct super_block *sb,
{
struct mem_dqinfo *info = sb_dqinfo(sb, type);
struct ocfs2_mem_dqinfo *oinfo = info->dqi_priv;
- struct ocfs2_quota_chunk *chunk;
+ struct ocfs2_quota_chunk *chunk = NULL, *iter;
struct ocfs2_local_disk_chunk *dchunk;
int found = 0, len;

- list_for_each_entry(chunk, &oinfo->dqi_chunk, qc_chunk) {
+ list_for_each_entry(iter, &oinfo->dqi_chunk, qc_chunk) {
dchunk = (struct ocfs2_local_disk_chunk *)
- chunk->qc_headerbh->b_data;
+ iter->qc_headerbh->b_data;
if (le32_to_cpu(dchunk->dqc_free) > 0) {
- found = 1;
+ chunk = iter;
break;
}
}
- if (!found)
+ if (!chunk)
return NULL;

if (chunk->qc_num < oinfo->dqi_chunks - 1) {

base-commit: f443e374ae131c168a065ea1748feac6b2e76613
--
2.25.1


2022-03-25 17:24:18

by Joseph Qi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ocfs2: replace usage of found with dedicated list iterator variable



On 3/24/22 3:16 PM, Jakob Koschel wrote:
> To move the list iterator variable into the list_for_each_entry_*()
> macro in the future it should be avoided to use the list iterator
> variable after the loop body.
>
> To *never* use the list iterator variable after the loop it was
> concluded to use a separate iterator variable instead of a
> found boolean [1].
>
> This removes the need to use a found variable and simply checking if
> the variable was set, can determine if the break/goto was hit.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgRr_D8CB-D9Kg-c=EHreAsk5SqXPwr9Y7k9sA6cWXJ6w@mail.gmail.com/
> Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <[email protected]>

Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <[email protected]>

> ---
> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmunlock.c | 21 ++++++++++-----------
> fs/ocfs2/quota_local.c | 10 +++++-----
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmunlock.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmunlock.c
> index 61103b2d69fb..7318e4794ef9 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmunlock.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmunlock.c
> @@ -392,9 +392,9 @@ int dlm_unlock_lock_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data,
> struct dlm_ctxt *dlm = data;
> struct dlm_unlock_lock *unlock = (struct dlm_unlock_lock *)msg->buf;
> struct dlm_lock_resource *res = NULL;
> - struct dlm_lock *lock = NULL;
> + struct dlm_lock *lock = NULL, *iter;
> enum dlm_status status = DLM_NORMAL;
> - int found = 0, i;
> + int i;
> struct dlm_lockstatus *lksb = NULL;
> int ignore;
> u32 flags;
> @@ -437,7 +437,6 @@ int dlm_unlock_lock_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data,
> }
>
> queue=&res->granted;
> - found = 0;
> spin_lock(&res->spinlock);
> if (res->state & DLM_LOCK_RES_RECOVERING) {
> spin_unlock(&res->spinlock);
> @@ -461,21 +460,21 @@ int dlm_unlock_lock_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data,
> }
>
> for (i=0; i<3; i++) {
> - list_for_each_entry(lock, queue, list) {
> - if (lock->ml.cookie == unlock->cookie &&
> - lock->ml.node == unlock->node_idx) {
> - dlm_lock_get(lock);
> - found = 1;
> + list_for_each_entry(iter, queue, list) {
> + if (iter->ml.cookie == unlock->cookie &&
> + iter->ml.node == unlock->node_idx) {
> + dlm_lock_get(iter);
> + lock = iter;
> break;
> }
> }
> - if (found)
> + if (lock)
> break;
> /* scan granted -> converting -> blocked queues */
> queue++;
> }
> spin_unlock(&res->spinlock);
> - if (!found) {
> + if (!lock) {
> status = DLM_IVLOCKID;
> goto not_found;
> }
> @@ -505,7 +504,7 @@ int dlm_unlock_lock_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data,
> dlm_kick_thread(dlm, res);
>
> not_found:
> - if (!found)
> + if (!lock)
> mlog(ML_ERROR, "failed to find lock to unlock! "
> "cookie=%u:%llu\n",
> dlm_get_lock_cookie_node(be64_to_cpu(unlock->cookie)),
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/quota_local.c b/fs/ocfs2/quota_local.c
> index 0e4b16d4c037..38cc75bd3127 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/quota_local.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/quota_local.c
> @@ -923,19 +923,19 @@ static struct ocfs2_quota_chunk *ocfs2_find_free_entry(struct super_block *sb,
> {
> struct mem_dqinfo *info = sb_dqinfo(sb, type);
> struct ocfs2_mem_dqinfo *oinfo = info->dqi_priv;
> - struct ocfs2_quota_chunk *chunk;
> + struct ocfs2_quota_chunk *chunk = NULL, *iter;
> struct ocfs2_local_disk_chunk *dchunk;
> int found = 0, len;
>
> - list_for_each_entry(chunk, &oinfo->dqi_chunk, qc_chunk) {
> + list_for_each_entry(iter, &oinfo->dqi_chunk, qc_chunk) {
> dchunk = (struct ocfs2_local_disk_chunk *)
> - chunk->qc_headerbh->b_data;
> + iter->qc_headerbh->b_data;
> if (le32_to_cpu(dchunk->dqc_free) > 0) {
> - found = 1;
> + chunk = iter;
> break;
> }
> }
> - if (!found)
> + if (!chunk)
> return NULL;
>
> if (chunk->qc_num < oinfo->dqi_chunks - 1) {
>
> base-commit: f443e374ae131c168a065ea1748feac6b2e76613