2022-03-26 18:04:18

by Julia Lawall

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: fix minmax.cocci warnings

From: kernel test robot <[email protected]>

Use min to simplify the code.

Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/misc/minmax.cocci

Fixes: 2747bc2106aa ("mtd: spi-nor: Add dual parallel and stacked mode support")
CC: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <[email protected]>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <[email protected]>
---

tree: https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx xlnx_rebase_v5.15_LTS
head: 1870e0fa79a9d58c6748c34550f3ccea0b515933
commit: 2747bc2106aa429773d9a932c799aa6229595148 [840/1029] mtd: spi-nor: Add dual parallel and stacked mode support
:::::: branch date: 34 hours ago
:::::: commit date: 8 weeks ago

drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
@@ -2034,10 +2034,7 @@ static int spi_nor_read(struct mtd_info
(offset << nor->shift);
}
}
- if (len < rem_bank_len)
- read_len = len;
- else
- read_len = rem_bank_len;
+ read_len = min(len, rem_bank_len);

/* Wait till previous write/erase is done. */
ret = spi_nor_wait_till_ready(nor);


2022-03-28 17:44:23

by Vignesh Raghavendra

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: fix minmax.cocci warnings

Hi.

On 26/03/22 2:00 pm, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
>
> Use min to simplify the code.
>
> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/misc/minmax.cocci
>
> Fixes: 2747bc2106aa ("mtd: spi-nor: Add dual parallel and stacked mode support")
> CC: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <[email protected]>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> tree: https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx xlnx_rebase_v5.15_LTS
> head: 1870e0fa79a9d58c6748c34550f3ccea0b515933
> commit: 2747bc2106aa429773d9a932c799aa6229595148 [840/1029] mtd: spi-nor: Add dual parallel and stacked mode support
> :::::: branch date: 34 hours ago
> :::::: commit date: 8 weeks ago
>
> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> @@ -2034,10 +2034,7 @@ static int spi_nor_read(struct mtd_info
> (offset << nor->shift);
> }
> }
> - if (len < rem_bank_len)
> - read_len = len;
> - else
> - read_len = rem_bank_len;
> + read_len = min(len, rem_bank_len);

This chunk does not exist in mainline. Seems like xlnx local changes.

Regards
Vignesh

2022-03-29 15:38:23

by Pratyush Yadav

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: fix minmax.cocci warnings

On 28/03/22 11:28AM, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On 26/03/22 2:00 pm, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > From: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
> >
> > Use min to simplify the code.
> >
> > Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/misc/minmax.cocci
> >
> > Fixes: 2747bc2106aa ("mtd: spi-nor: Add dual parallel and stacked mode support")
> > CC: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <[email protected]>
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >
> > tree: https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx xlnx_rebase_v5.15_LTS
> > head: 1870e0fa79a9d58c6748c34550f3ccea0b515933
> > commit: 2747bc2106aa429773d9a932c799aa6229595148 [840/1029] mtd: spi-nor: Add dual parallel and stacked mode support
> > :::::: branch date: 34 hours ago
> > :::::: commit date: 8 weeks ago
> >
> > drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c | 5 +----
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> > @@ -2034,10 +2034,7 @@ static int spi_nor_read(struct mtd_info
> > (offset << nor->shift);
> > }
> > }
> > - if (len < rem_bank_len)
> > - read_len = len;
> > - else
> > - read_len = rem_bank_len;
> > + read_len = min(len, rem_bank_len);
>
> This chunk does not exist in mainline. Seems like xlnx local changes.

Yes. I was very confused for a bit until I realized. It would be nice if
upstream maintainers and mailing lists were not Cced if the patch does
not target the mainline branch.

--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Texas Instruments Inc.