The function iterates an index from 0 to NUM_PMKID_CACHE and returns
the first index for which the condition is true. If no such index is
found, the function returns -1. Current code has a complex control
flow that obfuscates this simple task. Replace it with a loop.
Also, given the shortened function body, replace the long variable
name psecuritypriv with a short variable name p.
Reported by checkpatch:
WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return
Signed-off-by: Sevinj Aghayeva <[email protected]>
---
v1 -> v2: Put the conditional in a single line to avoid checkpatch
complaint.
drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c | 25 ++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c
index f94b1536a177..cddd8ab80236 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c
@@ -1637,26 +1637,13 @@ int rtw_restruct_wmm_ie(struct adapter *adapter, u8 *in_ie, u8 *out_ie, uint in_
static int SecIsInPMKIDList(struct adapter *Adapter, u8 *bssid)
{
- struct security_priv *psecuritypriv = &Adapter->securitypriv;
- int i = 0;
-
- do {
- if ((psecuritypriv->PMKIDList[i].bUsed) &&
- (!memcmp(psecuritypriv->PMKIDList[i].Bssid, bssid, ETH_ALEN))) {
- break;
- } else {
- i++;
- /* continue; */
- }
-
- } while (i < NUM_PMKID_CACHE);
+ struct security_priv *p = &Adapter->securitypriv;
+ int i;
- if (i == NUM_PMKID_CACHE) {
- i = -1;/* Could not find. */
- } else {
- /* There is one Pre-Authentication Key for the specific BSSID. */
- }
- return i;
+ for (i = 0; i < NUM_PMKID_CACHE; i++)
+ if (p->PMKIDList[i].bUsed && !memcmp(p->PMKIDList[i].Bssid, bssid, ETH_ALEN))
+ return i;
+ return -1;
}
/* */
--
2.25.1