2022-04-06 10:55:31

by Stephen Kitt

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: wm8731: use simple i2c probe function

The i2c probe functions here don't use the id information provided in
their second argument, so the single-parameter i2c probe function
("probe_new") can be used instead.

This avoids scanning the identifier tables during probes.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Kitt <[email protected]>
---
sound/soc/codecs/wm8731.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8731.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8731.c
index 5d4949c2ec9b..c430f169eb24 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8731.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8731.c
@@ -723,8 +723,7 @@ static struct spi_driver wm8731_spi_driver = {
#endif /* CONFIG_SPI_MASTER */

#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C)
-static int wm8731_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
- const struct i2c_device_id *id)
+static int wm8731_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c)
{
struct wm8731_priv *wm8731;
int ret;
@@ -788,7 +787,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver wm8731_i2c_driver = {
.name = "wm8731",
.of_match_table = wm8731_of_match,
},
- .probe = wm8731_i2c_probe,
+ .probe_new = wm8731_i2c_probe,
.id_table = wm8731_i2c_id,
};
#endif
--
2.27.0


2022-04-07 21:17:31

by Mark Brown

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: wm8731: use simple i2c probe function

On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 14:32:36 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> The i2c probe functions here don't use the id information provided in
> their second argument, so the single-parameter i2c probe function
> ("probe_new") can be used instead.
>
> This avoids scanning the identifier tables during probes.
>
>
> [...]

Applied to

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: wm8731: use simple i2c probe function
commit: 40658542d7713b6f1b51556ef91822f9ca8942d0

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark