In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
not being declared. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for
those drivers using them.
Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <[email protected]>
---
drivers/watchdog/Kconfig | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
index c4e82a8d863f..3242be37b2d7 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
@@ -453,6 +453,7 @@ config 21285_WATCHDOG
config 977_WATCHDOG
tristate "NetWinder WB83C977 watchdog"
depends on (FOOTBRIDGE && ARCH_NETWINDER) || (ARM && COMPILE_TEST)
+ depends on HAS_IOPORT
help
Say Y here to include support for the WB977 watchdog included in
NetWinder machines. Alternatively say M to compile the driver as
@@ -1235,6 +1236,7 @@ config ITCO_WDT
select WATCHDOG_CORE
depends on I2C || I2C=n
depends on MFD_INTEL_PMC_BXT || !MFD_INTEL_PMC_BXT
+ depends on HAS_IOPORT # for I2C_I801
select LPC_ICH if !EXPERT
select I2C_I801 if !EXPERT && I2C
help
@@ -2090,7 +2092,7 @@ comment "PCI-based Watchdog Cards"
config PCIPCWATCHDOG
tristate "Berkshire Products PCI-PC Watchdog"
- depends on PCI
+ depends on PCI && HAS_IOPORT
help
This is the driver for the Berkshire Products PCI-PC Watchdog card.
This card simply watches your kernel to make sure it doesn't freeze,
@@ -2105,7 +2107,7 @@ config PCIPCWATCHDOG
config WDTPCI
tristate "PCI-WDT500/501 Watchdog timer"
- depends on PCI
+ depends on PCI && HAS_IOPORT
help
If you have a PCI-WDT500/501 watchdog board, say Y here, otherwise N.
--
2.32.0
On Fri, 2022-04-29 at 15:50 +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
> not being declared. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for
> those drivers using them.
>
> Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <[email protected]>
> ---
Sorry everyone. I sent this as PATCH in error while preparing to sent
the same series as RFC. Since e-mail has no remote delete and I lack a
time machine let's just all pretend you only got the RFC.