2022-05-23 05:48:10

by Yuntao Wang

Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Fix test_run logic in fexit_stress.c

In the commit da00d2f117a0 ("bpf: Add test ops for BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING"),
the bpf_fentry_test1 function was moved into bpf_prog_test_run_tracing(),
which is the test_run function of the tracing BPF programs.

Thus calling 'bpf_prog_test_run_opts(filter_fd, &topts)' will not trigger
bpf_fentry_test1 function as filter_fd is a sk_filter BPF program.

Fix it by replacing filter_fd with fexit_fd in the bpf_prog_test_run_opts()
function.

Fixes: da00d2f117a0 ("bpf: Add test ops for BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING")
Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <[email protected]>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_stress.c | 32 +++----------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_stress.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_stress.c
index a7e74297f15f..5a7e6011f6bf 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_stress.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_stress.c
@@ -7,11 +7,9 @@

void serial_test_fexit_stress(void)
{
- char test_skb[128] = {};
int fexit_fd[CNT] = {};
int link_fd[CNT] = {};
- char error[4096];
- int err, i, filter_fd;
+ int err, i;

const struct bpf_insn trace_program[] = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
@@ -20,25 +18,9 @@ void serial_test_fexit_stress(void)

LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_prog_load_opts, trace_opts,
.expected_attach_type = BPF_TRACE_FEXIT,
- .log_buf = error,
- .log_size = sizeof(error),
);

- const struct bpf_insn skb_program[] = {
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- };
-
- LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_prog_load_opts, skb_opts,
- .log_buf = error,
- .log_size = sizeof(error),
- );
-
- LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts,
- .data_in = test_skb,
- .data_size_in = sizeof(test_skb),
- .repeat = 1,
- );
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts);

err = libbpf_find_vmlinux_btf_id("bpf_fentry_test1",
trace_opts.expected_attach_type);
@@ -58,15 +40,9 @@ void serial_test_fexit_stress(void)
goto out;
}

- filter_fd = bpf_prog_load(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, NULL, "GPL",
- skb_program, sizeof(skb_program) / sizeof(struct bpf_insn),
- &skb_opts);
- if (!ASSERT_GE(filter_fd, 0, "test_program_loaded"))
- goto out;
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(fexit_fd[0], &topts);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_test_run_opts");

- err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(filter_fd, &topts);
- close(filter_fd);
- CHECK_FAIL(err);
out:
for (i = 0; i < CNT; i++) {
if (link_fd[i])
--
2.36.1

2022-06-01 21:16:27

by patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Fix test_run logic in fexit_stress.c

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>:

On Sat, 21 May 2022 23:13:29 +0800 you wrote:
> In the commit da00d2f117a0 ("bpf: Add test ops for BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING"),
> the bpf_fentry_test1 function was moved into bpf_prog_test_run_tracing(),
> which is the test_run function of the tracing BPF programs.
>
> Thus calling 'bpf_prog_test_run_opts(filter_fd, &topts)' will not trigger
> bpf_fentry_test1 function as filter_fd is a sk_filter BPF program.
>
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Fix test_run logic in fexit_stress.c
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/960b8ef9609c

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html