Hello.
I'm just flushing the patches to make memcontrol selftests check the
events behavior we had consensus about (test_memcg_low fails).
(test_memcg_reclaim, test_memcg_swap_max fail for me now but it's present
even before the refactoring.)
The two bigger changes are:
- adjustment of the protected values to make tests succeed with the given
tolerance,
- both test_memcg_low and test_memcg_min check protection of memory in
populated cgroups (actually as per Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
memory.min should not apply to empty cgroups, which is not the case
currently. Therefore I unified tests with the populated case in order to to
bring more broken tests).
Thanks,
Michal
Changes from v2 (https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/)
- rebased on mm-stable 02e34fff195d3a5f67cbb553795dc109a37d1dcf
- collected acked-bys
- proper Fixes: tag
Changes from v1 (https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/)
- fixed mis-rebase in compilation fix patch,
- added review, ack tags from v1,
- applied feedback from v1 (Octave script in git tree),
- added one more patch extracting common parts,
- rebased on mm-stable bbe832b9db2e.
Michal Koutný (5):
selftests: memcg: Fix compilation
selftests: memcg: Expect no low events in unprotected sibling
selftests: memcg: Adjust expected reclaim values of protected cgroups
selftests: memcg: Remove protection from top level memcg
selftests: memcg: Factor out common parts of memory.{low,min} tests
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
.../selftests/cgroup/memcg_protection.m | 89 +++++++
.../selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c | 247 +++++-------------
3 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 185 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/memcg_protection.m
--
2.35.3