2022-05-26 18:36:47

by Rob Herring (Arm)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] spi: dt-bindings: Move 'rx-sample-delay-ns' to spi-peripheral-props.yaml

SPI bus per device properties must be defined in spi-peripheral-props.yaml
for unevaluatedProperties checks to work correctly on device nodes.

This has the side effect of promoting 'rx-sample-delay-ns' to be a
common property, but functionally it's no different if it was defined in
a Synopsys specific schema file.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
---
.../bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml | 18 +++++++++---------
.../bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml
index d7e08b03e204..e25d44c218f2 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml
@@ -124,9 +124,16 @@ properties:

rx-sample-delay-ns:
default: 0
- description: Default value of the rx-sample-delay-ns property.
+ description: |
+ Default value of the rx-sample-delay-ns property.
This value will be used if the property is not explicitly defined
- for a SPI slave device. See below.
+ for a SPI slave device.
+
+ SPI Rx sample delay offset, unit is nanoseconds.
+ The delay from the default sample time before the actual sample of the
+ rxd input signal occurs. The "rx_sample_delay" is an optional feature
+ of the designware controller, and the upper limit is also subject to
+ controller configuration.

patternProperties:
"^.*@[0-9a-f]+$":
@@ -142,13 +149,6 @@ patternProperties:
spi-tx-bus-width:
const: 1

- rx-sample-delay-ns:
- description: SPI Rx sample delay offset, unit is nanoseconds.
- The delay from the default sample time before the actual
- sample of the rxd input signal occurs. The "rx_sample_delay"
- is an optional feature of the designware controller, and the
- upper limit is also subject to controller configuration.
-
unevaluatedProperties: false

required:
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml
index 5e32928c4fc3..6ffb74352bef 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml
@@ -71,6 +71,11 @@ properties:
description:
Delay, in microseconds, after a read transfer.

+ rx-sample-delay-ns:
+ description: SPI Rx sample delay offset, unit is nanoseconds.
+ The delay from the default sample time before the actual
+ sample of the rxd input signal occurs.
+
spi-tx-bus-width:
description:
Bus width to the SPI bus used for write transfers.
--
2.34.1



2022-05-26 19:29:51

by Pratyush Yadav

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: dt-bindings: Move 'rx-sample-delay-ns' to spi-peripheral-props.yaml

Hi Rob,

On 25/05/22 04:00PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> SPI bus per device properties must be defined in spi-peripheral-props.yaml
> for unevaluatedProperties checks to work correctly on device nodes.
>
> This has the side effect of promoting 'rx-sample-delay-ns' to be a
> common property, but functionally it's no different if it was defined in
> a Synopsys specific schema file.

Functionally it is no different, but does this property make sense for
other controllers? If not then I don't see why we should pollute the
common list with controller-specific ones. For one, this now no longer
makes it obvious that this property should only be used with the
Synopsys controller. And if you keep making small exceptions for other
controllers too, soon the common list will be full of controller
properties and it will be a mess finding out what belongs to who.

>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml | 18 +++++++++---------
> .../bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml
> index d7e08b03e204..e25d44c218f2 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml
> @@ -124,9 +124,16 @@ properties:
>
> rx-sample-delay-ns:
> default: 0
> - description: Default value of the rx-sample-delay-ns property.
> + description: |
> + Default value of the rx-sample-delay-ns property.
> This value will be used if the property is not explicitly defined
> - for a SPI slave device. See below.
> + for a SPI slave device.
> +
> + SPI Rx sample delay offset, unit is nanoseconds.
> + The delay from the default sample time before the actual sample of the
> + rxd input signal occurs. The "rx_sample_delay" is an optional feature
> + of the designware controller, and the upper limit is also subject to
> + controller configuration.
>
> patternProperties:
> "^.*@[0-9a-f]+$":
> @@ -142,13 +149,6 @@ patternProperties:
> spi-tx-bus-width:
> const: 1
>
> - rx-sample-delay-ns:
> - description: SPI Rx sample delay offset, unit is nanoseconds.
> - The delay from the default sample time before the actual
> - sample of the rxd input signal occurs. The "rx_sample_delay"
> - is an optional feature of the designware controller, and the
> - upper limit is also subject to controller configuration.
> -
> unevaluatedProperties: false
>
> required:
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml
> index 5e32928c4fc3..6ffb74352bef 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml
> @@ -71,6 +71,11 @@ properties:
> description:
> Delay, in microseconds, after a read transfer.
>
> + rx-sample-delay-ns:
> + description: SPI Rx sample delay offset, unit is nanoseconds.
> + The delay from the default sample time before the actual
> + sample of the rxd input signal occurs.
> +
> spi-tx-bus-width:
> description:
> Bus width to the SPI bus used for write transfers.
> --
> 2.34.1
>

--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Texas Instruments Inc.

2022-05-27 12:08:05

by Rob Herring (Arm)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: dt-bindings: Move 'rx-sample-delay-ns' to spi-peripheral-props.yaml

On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 11:16:42AM +0530, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 25/05/22 04:00PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > SPI bus per device properties must be defined in spi-peripheral-props.yaml
> > for unevaluatedProperties checks to work correctly on device nodes.
> >
> > This has the side effect of promoting 'rx-sample-delay-ns' to be a
> > common property, but functionally it's no different if it was defined in
> > a Synopsys specific schema file.
>
> Functionally it is no different, but does this property make sense for
> other controllers? If not then I don't see why we should pollute the
> common list with controller-specific ones. For one, this now no longer
> makes it obvious that this property should only be used with the
> Synopsys controller. And if you keep making small exceptions for other
> controllers too, soon the common list will be full of controller
> properties and it will be a mess finding out what belongs to who.

There's at least one other case already:

cdns,read-delay:
$ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
description:
Delay for read capture logic, in clock cycles.


Too many common properties is not a problem we have. Too many custom
properties doing the same thing is the problem.

Rob

2022-05-28 19:56:07

by Serge Semin

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: dt-bindings: Move 'rx-sample-delay-ns' to spi-peripheral-props.yaml

On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 08:54:04AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 11:16:42AM +0530, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > On 25/05/22 04:00PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > SPI bus per device properties must be defined in spi-peripheral-props.yaml
> > > for unevaluatedProperties checks to work correctly on device nodes.
> > >
> > > This has the side effect of promoting 'rx-sample-delay-ns' to be a
> > > common property, but functionally it's no different if it was defined in
> > > a Synopsys specific schema file.
> >
> > Functionally it is no different, but does this property make sense for
> > other controllers? If not then I don't see why we should pollute the
> > common list with controller-specific ones. For one, this now no longer
> > makes it obvious that this property should only be used with the
> > Synopsys controller. And if you keep making small exceptions for other
> > controllers too, soon the common list will be full of controller
> > properties and it will be a mess finding out what belongs to who.
>

> There's at least one other case already:
>
> cdns,read-delay:
> $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> description:
> Delay for read capture logic, in clock cycles.

What about creating the schemas hierarchy for the device-specific
properties as I already suggested in the other thread? Like this:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ide/20220527101057.b5z7ase6y4naoxvk@mobilestation

-Sergey

>
>
> Too many common properties is not a problem we have. Too many custom
> properties doing the same thing is the problem.
>
> Rob

2022-06-01 16:40:29

by Pratyush Yadav

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: dt-bindings: Move 'rx-sample-delay-ns' to spi-peripheral-props.yaml

On 26/05/22 08:54AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 11:16:42AM +0530, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > On 25/05/22 04:00PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > SPI bus per device properties must be defined in spi-peripheral-props.yaml
> > > for unevaluatedProperties checks to work correctly on device nodes.
> > >
> > > This has the side effect of promoting 'rx-sample-delay-ns' to be a
> > > common property, but functionally it's no different if it was defined in
> > > a Synopsys specific schema file.
> >
> > Functionally it is no different, but does this property make sense for
> > other controllers? If not then I don't see why we should pollute the
> > common list with controller-specific ones. For one, this now no longer
> > makes it obvious that this property should only be used with the
> > Synopsys controller. And if you keep making small exceptions for other
> > controllers too, soon the common list will be full of controller
> > properties and it will be a mess finding out what belongs to who.
>
> There's at least one other case already:
>
> cdns,read-delay:
> $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> description:
> Delay for read capture logic, in clock cycles.
>
>
> Too many common properties is not a problem we have. Too many custom
> properties doing the same thing is the problem.

I agree. But in this case these two properties have different units.
rx-sample-delay-ns is obviously in nanoseconds. cdns,read-delay is in
number of ref clock cycles. If other controllers also use this property,
it could make sense to make rx-sample-delay-ns the default/common
property and drivers can then make conversions between the units that
should actually be programmed.

--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Texas Instruments Inc.

2022-06-01 19:25:23

by Rob Herring (Arm)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: dt-bindings: Move 'rx-sample-delay-ns' to spi-peripheral-props.yaml

On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 02:32:26PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 08:54:04AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 11:16:42AM +0530, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> > > Hi Rob,
> > >
> > > On 25/05/22 04:00PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > SPI bus per device properties must be defined in spi-peripheral-props.yaml
> > > > for unevaluatedProperties checks to work correctly on device nodes.
> > > >
> > > > This has the side effect of promoting 'rx-sample-delay-ns' to be a
> > > > common property, but functionally it's no different if it was defined in
> > > > a Synopsys specific schema file.
> > >
> > > Functionally it is no different, but does this property make sense for
> > > other controllers? If not then I don't see why we should pollute the
> > > common list with controller-specific ones. For one, this now no longer
> > > makes it obvious that this property should only be used with the
> > > Synopsys controller. And if you keep making small exceptions for other
> > > controllers too, soon the common list will be full of controller
> > > properties and it will be a mess finding out what belongs to who.
> >
>
> > There's at least one other case already:
> >
> > cdns,read-delay:
> > $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > description:
> > Delay for read capture logic, in clock cycles.
>
> What about creating the schemas hierarchy for the device-specific
> properties as I already suggested in the other thread? Like this:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ide/20220527101057.b5z7ase6y4naoxvk@mobilestation

Because that doesn't work. I'll explain in that thread.

Rob

2022-06-07 13:45:44

by Mark Brown

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: dt-bindings: Move 'rx-sample-delay-ns' to spi-peripheral-props.yaml

On Wed, 25 May 2022 16:00:53 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> SPI bus per device properties must be defined in spi-peripheral-props.yaml
> for unevaluatedProperties checks to work correctly on device nodes.
>
> This has the side effect of promoting 'rx-sample-delay-ns' to be a
> common property, but functionally it's no different if it was defined in
> a Synopsys specific schema file.
>
> [...]

Applied to

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: dt-bindings: Move 'rx-sample-delay-ns' to spi-peripheral-props.yaml
commit: b658be56e867061a0d5496e837f350974ada5c89

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark