of_find_node_by_path() returns a node pointer with refcount incremented,
we should use of_node_put() on it when not need anymore.
Add missing of_node_put() to avoid refcount leak.
Fixes: 960ddf70cc11 ("drivers: soc: atmel: Avoid calling at91_soc_init on non AT91 SoCs")
Signed-off-by: Miaoqian Lin <[email protected]>
---
drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c b/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
index b2d365ae0282..46dfa24c52fb 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
@@ -369,10 +369,13 @@ static int __init atmel_soc_device_init(void)
{
struct device_node *np = of_find_node_by_path("/");
- if (!of_match_node(at91_soc_allowed_list, np))
+ if (!of_match_node(at91_soc_allowed_list, np)) {
+ of_node_put(np);
return 0;
+ }
at91_soc_init(socs);
+ of_node_put(np);
return 0;
}
--
2.25.1
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 09:00:52AM +0000, [email protected] wrote:
> On 05.06.2022 11:40, Miaoqian Lin wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> >
> > of_find_node_by_path() returns a node pointer with refcount incremented,
> > we should use of_node_put() on it when not need anymore.
> > Add missing of_node_put() to avoid refcount leak.
> >
> > Fixes: 960ddf70cc11 ("drivers: soc: atmel: Avoid calling at91_soc_init on non AT91 SoCs")
> > Signed-off-by: Miaoqian Lin <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c b/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
> > index b2d365ae0282..46dfa24c52fb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
> > @@ -369,10 +369,13 @@ static int __init atmel_soc_device_init(void)
> > {
> > struct device_node *np = of_find_node_by_path("/");
> >
>
> What about having it like this:
> const struct of_device_id *of_id;
>
> of_id = of_match_node(at91_soc_allowed_list, np);
> of_node_put(np);
+1, I was about to make similar suggestion in couple of other patches making
similar changes.
--
Regards,
Sudeep