From: Feng Zhou <[email protected]>
We encountered bad case on big system with 96 CPUs that
alloc_htab_elem() would last for 1ms. The reason is that after the
prealloc hashtab has no free elems, when trying to update, it will still
grab spin_locks of all cpus. If there are multiple update users, the
competition is very serious.
0001: Use head->first to check whether the free list is empty or not before taking
the lock.
0002: Add benchmark to reproduce this worst case.
Changelog:
v5->v6: Addressed comments from Alexei Starovoitov.
- Adjust the commit log.
some details in here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
v4->v5: Addressed comments from Alexei Starovoitov.
- Use head->first.
- Use cpu+max_entries.
some details in here:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/
v3->v4: Addressed comments from Daniel Borkmann.
- Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE.
some details in here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
v2->v3: Addressed comments from Alexei Starovoitov, Andrii Nakryiko.
- Adjust the way the benchmark is tested.
- Adjust the code format.
some details in here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/T/
v1->v2: Addressed comments from Alexei Starovoitov.
- add a benchmark to reproduce the issue.
- Adjust the code format that avoid adding indent.
some details in here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/T/
Feng Zhou (2):
bpf: avoid grabbing spin_locks of all cpus when no free elems
selftest/bpf/benchs: Add bpf_map benchmark
kernel/bpf/percpu_freelist.c | 20 ++--
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 4 +-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c | 2 +
.../benchs/bench_bpf_hashmap_full_update.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++
.../run_bench_bpf_hashmap_full_update.sh | 11 +++
.../bpf/progs/bpf_hashmap_full_update_bench.c | 40 ++++++++
6 files changed, 166 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_bpf_hashmap_full_update.c
create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_bench_bpf_hashmap_full_update.sh
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_hashmap_full_update_bench.c
--
2.20.1
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 10:33:06 +0800 you wrote:
> From: Feng Zhou <[email protected]>
>
> We encountered bad case on big system with 96 CPUs that
> alloc_htab_elem() would last for 1ms. The reason is that after the
> prealloc hashtab has no free elems, when trying to update, it will still
> grab spin_locks of all cpus. If there are multiple update users, the
> competition is very serious.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v6,1/2] bpf: avoid grabbing spin_locks of all cpus when no free elems
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/54a9c3a42d92
- [v6,2/2] selftest/bpf/benchs: Add bpf_map benchmark
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/89eda98428ce
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html