From: Feng Zhou <[email protected]>
This patch use head->first in pcpu_freelist_head to check freelist
having free or not. If having, grab spin_lock, or check next cpu's
freelist.
Before patch: hash_map performance
./map_perf_test 1
0:hash_map_perf pre-alloc 1043397 events per sec
...
The average of the test results is around 1050000 events per sec.
hash_map the worst: no free
./run_bench_bpf_hashmap_full_update.sh
Setting up benchmark 'bpf-hashmap-ful-update'...
Benchmark 'bpf-hashmap-ful-update' started.
1:hash_map_full_perf 15687 events per sec
...
The average of the test results is around 16000 events per sec.
ftrace trace:
0) | htab_map_update_elem() {
0) | __pcpu_freelist_pop() {
0) | _raw_spin_lock()
0) | _raw_spin_unlock()
0) | ...
0) + 25.188 us | }
0) + 28.439 us | }
The test machine is 16C, trying to get spin_lock 17 times, in addition
to 16c, there is an extralist.
after patch: hash_map performance
./map_perf_test 1
0:hash_map_perf pre-alloc 1053298 events per sec
...
The average of the test results is around 1050000 events per sec.
hash_map worst: no free
./run_bench_bpf_hashmap_full_update.sh
Setting up benchmark 'bpf-hashmap-ful-update'...
Benchmark 'bpf-hashmap-ful-update' started.
1:hash_map_full_perf 555830 events per sec
...
The average of the test results is around 550000 events per sec.
ftrace trace:
0) | htab_map_update_elem() {
0) | alloc_htab_elem() {
0) 0.586 us | __pcpu_freelist_pop();
0) 0.945 us | }
0) 8.669 us | }
It can be seen that after adding this patch, the map performance is
almost not degraded, and when free=0, first check head->first instead of
directly acquiring spin_lock.
Co-developed-by: Chengming Zhou <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Feng Zhou <[email protected]>
---
kernel/bpf/percpu_freelist.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/percpu_freelist.c b/kernel/bpf/percpu_freelist.c
index 3d897de89061..00b874c8e889 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/percpu_freelist.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/percpu_freelist.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static inline void pcpu_freelist_push_node(struct pcpu_freelist_head *head,
struct pcpu_freelist_node *node)
{
node->next = head->first;
- head->first = node;
+ WRITE_ONCE(head->first, node);
}
static inline void ___pcpu_freelist_push(struct pcpu_freelist_head *head,
@@ -130,14 +130,17 @@ static struct pcpu_freelist_node *___pcpu_freelist_pop(struct pcpu_freelist *s)
orig_cpu = cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
while (1) {
head = per_cpu_ptr(s->freelist, cpu);
+ if (!READ_ONCE(head->first))
+ goto next_cpu;
raw_spin_lock(&head->lock);
node = head->first;
if (node) {
- head->first = node->next;
+ WRITE_ONCE(head->first, node->next);
raw_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
return node;
}
raw_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
+next_cpu:
cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, cpu_possible_mask);
if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
cpu = 0;
@@ -146,10 +149,12 @@ static struct pcpu_freelist_node *___pcpu_freelist_pop(struct pcpu_freelist *s)
}
/* per cpu lists are all empty, try extralist */
+ if (!READ_ONCE(s->extralist.first))
+ return NULL;
raw_spin_lock(&s->extralist.lock);
node = s->extralist.first;
if (node)
- s->extralist.first = node->next;
+ WRITE_ONCE(s->extralist.first, node->next);
raw_spin_unlock(&s->extralist.lock);
return node;
}
@@ -164,15 +169,18 @@ ___pcpu_freelist_pop_nmi(struct pcpu_freelist *s)
orig_cpu = cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
while (1) {
head = per_cpu_ptr(s->freelist, cpu);
+ if (!READ_ONCE(head->first))
+ goto next_cpu;
if (raw_spin_trylock(&head->lock)) {
node = head->first;
if (node) {
- head->first = node->next;
+ WRITE_ONCE(head->first, node->next);
raw_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
return node;
}
raw_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
}
+next_cpu:
cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, cpu_possible_mask);
if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
cpu = 0;
@@ -181,11 +189,11 @@ ___pcpu_freelist_pop_nmi(struct pcpu_freelist *s)
}
/* cannot pop from per cpu lists, try extralist */
- if (!raw_spin_trylock(&s->extralist.lock))
+ if (!READ_ONCE(s->extralist.first) || !raw_spin_trylock(&s->extralist.lock))
return NULL;
node = s->extralist.first;
if (node)
- s->extralist.first = node->next;
+ WRITE_ONCE(s->extralist.first, node->next);
raw_spin_unlock(&s->extralist.lock);
return node;
}
--
2.20.1