Greeting,
FYI, we noticed a -4.3% regression of phoronix-test-suite.fio.SequentialWrite.Sync.Yes.No.4KB.DefaultTestDirectory.mb_s due to commit:
commit: b6c81e63ec1e668f8df716a91c5386074411dbbe ("[PATCH v8 08/14] fs: add __remove_file_privs() with flags parameter")
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Stefan-Roesch/io-uring-xfs-support-async-buffered-writes/20220609-013837
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/[email protected]
in testcase: phoronix-test-suite
on test machine: 96 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6252 CPU @ 2.10GHz with 512G memory
with following parameters:
test: fio-1.14.1
option_a: Sequential Write
option_b: Sync
option_c: Yes
option_d: No
option_e: 4KB
option_f: Default Test Directory
cpufreq_governor: performance
ucode: 0x500320a
test-description: The Phoronix Test Suite is the most comprehensive testing and benchmarking platform available that provides an extensible framework for which new tests can be easily added.
test-url: http://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
Details are as below:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
To reproduce:
git clone https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git
cd lkp-tests
sudo bin/lkp install job.yaml # job file is attached in this email
bin/lkp split-job --compatible job.yaml # generate the yaml file for lkp run
sudo bin/lkp run generated-yaml-file
# if come across any failure that blocks the test,
# please remove ~/.lkp and /lkp dir to run from a clean state.
=========================================================================================
compiler/cpufreq_governor/kconfig/option_a/option_b/option_c/option_d/option_e/option_f/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase/ucode:
gcc-11/performance/x86_64-rhel-8.3/Sequential Write/Sync/Yes/No/4KB/Default Test Directory/debian-x86_64-phoronix/lkp-csl-2sp7/fio-1.14.1/phoronix-test-suite/0x500320a
commit:
003096ce91 ("fs: Add check for async buffered writes to generic_write_checks")
b6c81e63ec ("fs: add __remove_file_privs() with flags parameter")
003096ce910675ce b6c81e63ec1e668f8df716a91c5
---------------- ---------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev
\ | \
245666 -4.3% 235222 phoronix-test-suite.fio.SequentialWrite.Sync.Yes.No.4KB.DefaultTestDirectory.iops
960.00 -4.3% 919.17 phoronix-test-suite.fio.SequentialWrite.Sync.Yes.No.4KB.DefaultTestDirectory.mb_s
1.51e+08 -5.5% 1.427e+08 phoronix-test-suite.time.file_system_outputs
256970 ? 9% +44.3% 370918 ? 11% meminfo.Dirty
267660 ? 11% +39.6% 373743 ? 11% numa-meminfo.node0.Dirty
610732 -4.5% 583080 vmstat.io.bo
67160 ? 11% +38.3% 92904 ? 11% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_dirty
79263 ? 8% +33.0% 105418 ? 10% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_zone_write_pending
32.67 +2.5% 33.48 perf-stat.i.major-faults
5211 +2.3% 5331 perf-stat.i.minor-faults
3509036 -7.2% 3255351 ? 3% perf-stat.i.node-stores
5244 +2.3% 5364 perf-stat.i.page-faults
32.44 +2.5% 33.24 perf-stat.ps.major-faults
5173 +2.3% 5292 perf-stat.ps.minor-faults
3477114 -7.2% 3225288 ? 3% perf-stat.ps.node-stores
5206 +2.3% 5324 perf-stat.ps.page-faults
18872500 -5.5% 17841229 proc-vmstat.nr_dirtied
65070 ? 9% +42.8% 92916 ? 11% proc-vmstat.nr_dirty
827164 +3.2% 853524 proc-vmstat.nr_file_pages
386220 +6.9% 412691 ? 2% proc-vmstat.nr_inactive_file
29963 +2.5% 30724 proc-vmstat.nr_slab_reclaimable
18830707 -5.8% 17734737 proc-vmstat.nr_written
386220 +6.9% 412691 ? 2% proc-vmstat.nr_zone_inactive_file
77263 ? 6% +35.2% 104462 ? 9% proc-vmstat.nr_zone_write_pending
23867810 ? 3% -8.0% 21964544 proc-vmstat.numa_hit
22976263 -4.8% 21871403 proc-vmstat.numa_local
22987067 -4.6% 21929083 proc-vmstat.pgalloc_normal
22684993 -5.0% 21562034 proc-vmstat.pgfree
75323098 -5.8% 70939215 proc-vmstat.pgpgout
9889 ? 9% -17.4% 8171 ? 10% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.stddev
9.45 ? 51% +247.3% 32.81 ? 72% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.removed.load_avg.avg
53.83 ? 25% +159.7% 139.81 ? 54% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.removed.load_avg.stddev
4.30 ? 52% +260.1% 15.49 ? 76% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.removed.runnable_avg.avg
24.46 ? 33% +172.5% 66.65 ? 57% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.removed.runnable_avg.stddev
4.30 ? 52% +260.1% 15.49 ? 76% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.removed.util_avg.avg
24.46 ? 33% +172.5% 66.65 ? 57% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.removed.util_avg.stddev
820.61 ? 7% +18.9% 975.33 ? 7% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.runnable_avg.max
9891 ? 9% -17.4% 8171 ? 10% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.spread0.stddev
818.56 ? 7% +19.1% 975.06 ? 7% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.util_avg.max
11.42 ? 27% +92.0% 21.92 ? 33% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.util_est_enqueued.avg
427.50 ? 24% +84.2% 787.44 ? 30% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.util_est_enqueued.max
58.65 ? 22% +79.2% 105.07 ? 29% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.util_est_enqueued.stddev
0.00 +0.7 0.74 ? 11% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__vfs_getxattr.cap_inode_need_killpriv.security_inode_need_killpriv.__file_remove_privs.file_modified
0.00 +0.8 0.80 ? 9% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.cap_inode_need_killpriv.security_inode_need_killpriv.__file_remove_privs.file_modified.ext4_buffered_write_iter
0.00 +0.8 0.84 ? 11% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.security_inode_need_killpriv.__file_remove_privs.file_modified.ext4_buffered_write_iter.new_sync_write
0.00 +0.9 0.90 ? 9% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__file_remove_privs.file_modified.ext4_buffered_write_iter.new_sync_write.vfs_write
0.00 +0.9 0.91 ? 9% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.file_modified.ext4_buffered_write_iter.new_sync_write.vfs_write.ksys_write
0.40 ? 10% -0.1 0.33 ? 13% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.jbd2_journal_grab_journal_head
0.26 ? 18% -0.1 0.20 ? 13% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.file_update_time
0.12 ? 8% -0.0 0.08 ? 20% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.xa_get_order
0.09 ? 16% +0.0 0.12 ? 13% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.do_filp_open
0.09 ? 17% +0.0 0.12 ? 13% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.path_openat
0.00 +0.1 0.08 ? 16% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.up_read
0.00 +0.1 0.09 ? 30% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.shmem_xattr_handler_get
0.00 +0.1 0.11 ? 31% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.strlen
0.00 +0.1 0.13 ? 27% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.simple_xattr_get
0.00 +0.2 0.19 ? 17% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.down_read
0.00 +0.4 0.36 ? 9% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.xattr_resolve_name
0.00 +0.4 0.44 ? 11% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.ext4_xattr_get
0.02 ?141% +0.9 0.91 ? 9% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.file_modified
0.00 +1.1 1.14 ? 10% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__vfs_getxattr
0.00 +1.2 1.22 ? 10% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.cap_inode_need_killpriv
0.00 +1.3 1.26 ? 10% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.security_inode_need_killpriv
0.00 +1.4 1.37 ? 10% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__file_remove_privs
0.40 ? 11% -0.1 0.32 ? 12% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.jbd2_journal_grab_journal_head
0.16 ? 19% -0.1 0.09 ? 26% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.ext4_da_write_begin
0.22 ? 10% -0.1 0.16 ? 14% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.create_empty_buffers
0.00 +0.1 0.08 ? 16% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.up_read
0.00 +0.1 0.08 ? 16% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.ext4_xattr_get
0.00 +0.1 0.09 ? 15% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.down_read
0.00 +0.1 0.09 ? 22% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__file_remove_privs
0.00 +0.1 0.09 ? 22% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.cap_inode_need_killpriv
0.00 +0.1 0.10 ? 36% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.strlen
0.00 +0.4 0.35 ? 9% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.xattr_resolve_name
Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp