It has NULL check in clk_prepare_enable(), so it no need
to check the clk before calling it.
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <[email protected]>
---
drivers/clk/imx/clk.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.c
index 5582f18dd632..1c5d5b957c96 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.c
@@ -189,9 +189,7 @@ void imx_register_uart_clocks(unsigned int clk_count)
if (IS_ERR(imx_uart_clocks[imx_enabled_uart_clocks]))
return;
- /* Only enable the clock if it's not NULL */
- if (imx_uart_clocks[imx_enabled_uart_clocks])
- clk_prepare_enable(imx_uart_clocks[imx_enabled_uart_clocks++]);
+ clk_prepare_enable(imx_uart_clocks[imx_enabled_uart_clocks++]);
}
}
#endif
--
2.25.1
Quoting Yang Yingliang (2022-06-30 07:13:08)
> It has NULL check in clk_prepare_enable(), so it no need
> to check the clk before calling it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/clk/imx/clk.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.c
> index 5582f18dd632..1c5d5b957c96 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.c
> @@ -189,9 +189,7 @@ void imx_register_uart_clocks(unsigned int clk_count)
> if (IS_ERR(imx_uart_clocks[imx_enabled_uart_clocks]))
> return;
>
> - /* Only enable the clock if it's not NULL */
> - if (imx_uart_clocks[imx_enabled_uart_clocks])
> - clk_prepare_enable(imx_uart_clocks[imx_enabled_uart_clocks++]);
> + clk_prepare_enable(imx_uart_clocks[imx_enabled_uart_clocks++]);
Nak
The ++ operator has side-effects, which wasn't the case before this
patch.