The TongFang PF5PU1G, PF4NU1F, PF5NU1G, and PF5LUXG/TUXEDO BA15 Gen10,
Pulse 14/15 Gen1, and Pulse 15 Gen2 have the same problem as the Clevo
NL5xRU and NL5xNU/TUXEDO Aura 15 Gen1 and Gen2:
They have a working native and video interface. However the default
detection mechanism first registers the video interface before
unregistering it again and switching to the native interface during boot.
This results in a dangling SBIOS request for backlight change for some
reason, causing the backlight to switch to ~2% once per boot on the first
power cord connect or disconnect event. Setting the native interface
explicitly circumvents this buggy behaviour by avoiding the unregistering
process.
Signed-off-by: Werner Sembach <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
---
drivers/acpi/video_detect.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
index becc198e4c22..cdde2e069d63 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
@@ -490,7 +490,56 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id video_detect_dmi_table[] = {
DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "NL5xNU"),
},
},
-
+ /*
+ * The TongFang PF5PU1G, PF4NU1F, PF5NU1G, and PF5LUXG/TUXEDO BA15 Gen10,
+ * Pulse 14/15 Gen1, and Pulse 15 Gen2 have the same problem as the Clevo
+ * NL5xRU and NL5xNU/TUXEDO Aura 15 Gen1 and Gen2. See the description
+ * above.
+ */
+ {
+ .callback = video_detect_force_native,
+ .ident = "TongFang PF5PU1G",
+ .matches = {
+ DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "PF5PU1G"),
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .callback = video_detect_force_native,
+ .ident = "TongFang PF4NU1F",
+ .matches = {
+ DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "PF4NU1F"),
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .callback = video_detect_force_native,
+ .ident = "TongFang PF4NU1F",
+ .matches = {
+ DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "TUXEDO"),
+ DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "PULSE1401"),
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .callback = video_detect_force_native,
+ .ident = "TongFang PF5NU1G",
+ .matches = {
+ DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "PF5NU1G"),
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .callback = video_detect_force_native,
+ .ident = "TongFang PF5NU1G",
+ .matches = {
+ DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "TUXEDO"),
+ DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "PULSE1501"),
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .callback = video_detect_force_native,
+ .ident = "TongFang PF5LUXG",
+ .matches = {
+ DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "PF5LUXG"),
+ },
+ },
/*
* Desktops which falsely report a backlight and which our heuristics
* for this do not catch.
--
2.34.1
Hi,
On 7/7/22 20:09, Werner Sembach wrote:
> The TongFang PF5PU1G, PF4NU1F, PF5NU1G, and PF5LUXG/TUXEDO BA15 Gen10,
> Pulse 14/15 Gen1, and Pulse 15 Gen2 have the same problem as the Clevo
> NL5xRU and NL5xNU/TUXEDO Aura 15 Gen1 and Gen2:
> They have a working native and video interface. However the default
> detection mechanism first registers the video interface before
> unregistering it again and switching to the native interface during boot.
> This results in a dangling SBIOS request for backlight change for some
> reason, causing the backlight to switch to ~2% once per boot on the first
> power cord connect or disconnect event. Setting the native interface
> explicitly circumvents this buggy behaviour by avoiding the unregistering
> process.
>
> Signed-off-by: Werner Sembach <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
Thanks, the series looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
for the series.
Regards,
Hans
> ---
> drivers/acpi/video_detect.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
> index becc198e4c22..cdde2e069d63 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
> @@ -490,7 +490,56 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id video_detect_dmi_table[] = {
> DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "NL5xNU"),
> },
> },
> -
> + /*
> + * The TongFang PF5PU1G, PF4NU1F, PF5NU1G, and PF5LUXG/TUXEDO BA15 Gen10,
> + * Pulse 14/15 Gen1, and Pulse 15 Gen2 have the same problem as the Clevo
> + * NL5xRU and NL5xNU/TUXEDO Aura 15 Gen1 and Gen2. See the description
> + * above.
> + */
> + {
> + .callback = video_detect_force_native,
> + .ident = "TongFang PF5PU1G",
> + .matches = {
> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "PF5PU1G"),
> + },
> + },
> + {
> + .callback = video_detect_force_native,
> + .ident = "TongFang PF4NU1F",
> + .matches = {
> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "PF4NU1F"),
> + },
> + },
> + {
> + .callback = video_detect_force_native,
> + .ident = "TongFang PF4NU1F",
> + .matches = {
> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "TUXEDO"),
> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "PULSE1401"),
> + },
> + },
> + {
> + .callback = video_detect_force_native,
> + .ident = "TongFang PF5NU1G",
> + .matches = {
> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "PF5NU1G"),
> + },
> + },
> + {
> + .callback = video_detect_force_native,
> + .ident = "TongFang PF5NU1G",
> + .matches = {
> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "TUXEDO"),
> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "PULSE1501"),
> + },
> + },
> + {
> + .callback = video_detect_force_native,
> + .ident = "TongFang PF5LUXG",
> + .matches = {
> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "PF5LUXG"),
> + },
> + },
> /*
> * Desktops which falsely report a backlight and which our heuristics
> * for this do not catch.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 7:25 PM Hans de Goede <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 7/7/22 20:09, Werner Sembach wrote:
> > The TongFang PF5PU1G, PF4NU1F, PF5NU1G, and PF5LUXG/TUXEDO BA15 Gen10,
> > Pulse 14/15 Gen1, and Pulse 15 Gen2 have the same problem as the Clevo
> > NL5xRU and NL5xNU/TUXEDO Aura 15 Gen1 and Gen2:
> > They have a working native and video interface. However the default
> > detection mechanism first registers the video interface before
> > unregistering it again and switching to the native interface during boot.
> > This results in a dangling SBIOS request for backlight change for some
> > reason, causing the backlight to switch to ~2% once per boot on the first
> > power cord connect or disconnect event. Setting the native interface
> > explicitly circumvents this buggy behaviour by avoiding the unregistering
> > process.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Werner Sembach <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]
>
> Thanks, the series looks good to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
>
> for the series.
Both patches applied as 5.20 material, thanks!