2022-07-09 01:18:12

by Justin Stitt

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2] net: ipv4: fix clang -Wformat warnings

When building with Clang we encounter these warnings:
| net/ipv4/ah4.c:513:4: error: format specifies type 'unsigned short' but
| the argument has type 'int' [-Werror,-Wformat]
| aalg_desc->uinfo.auth.icv_fullbits / 8);
-
| net/ipv4/esp4.c:1114:5: error: format specifies type 'unsigned short'
| but the argument has type 'int' [-Werror,-Wformat]
| aalg_desc->uinfo.auth.icv_fullbits / 8);

`aalg_desc->uinfo.auth.icv_fullbits` is a u16 but due to default
argument promotion becomes an int.

Variadic functions (printf-like) undergo default argument promotion.
Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst specifically recommends using
the promoted-to-type's format flag.

As per C11 6.3.1.1:
(https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1548.pdf) `If an int
can represent all values of the original type ..., the value is
converted to an int; otherwise, it is converted to an unsigned int.
These are called the integer promotions.` Thus it makes sense to change
%hu to %d not only to follow this standard but to suppress the warning
as well.

Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/378
Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Nick Desaulniers <[email protected]>
---
diff from v1 -> v2:
* packaged two related patches together: (Suggested by Nick)
- https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
- https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
* use Joe's suggestion regarding `%u` over `%d`.

net/ipv4/ah4.c | 2 +-
net/ipv4/esp4.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/ah4.c b/net/ipv4/ah4.c
index 6eea1e9e998d..f8ad04470d3a 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ah4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ah4.c
@@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ static int ah_init_state(struct xfrm_state *x)

if (aalg_desc->uinfo.auth.icv_fullbits/8 !=
crypto_ahash_digestsize(ahash)) {
- pr_info("%s: %s digestsize %u != %hu\n",
+ pr_info("%s: %s digestsize %u != %u\n",
__func__, x->aalg->alg_name,
crypto_ahash_digestsize(ahash),
aalg_desc->uinfo.auth.icv_fullbits / 8);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/esp4.c b/net/ipv4/esp4.c
index b21238df3301..b694f352ce7a 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/esp4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/esp4.c
@@ -1108,7 +1108,7 @@ static int esp_init_authenc(struct xfrm_state *x)
err = -EINVAL;
if (aalg_desc->uinfo.auth.icv_fullbits / 8 !=
crypto_aead_authsize(aead)) {
- pr_info("ESP: %s digestsize %u != %hu\n",
+ pr_info("ESP: %s digestsize %u != %u\n",
x->aalg->alg_name,
crypto_aead_authsize(aead),
aalg_desc->uinfo.auth.icv_fullbits / 8);
--
2.37.0.rc0.161.g10f37bed90-goog


2022-07-14 10:41:55

by Steffen Klassert

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: ipv4: fix clang -Wformat warnings

On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 05:37:04PM -0700, Justin Stitt wrote:
> When building with Clang we encounter these warnings:
> | net/ipv4/ah4.c:513:4: error: format specifies type 'unsigned short' but
> | the argument has type 'int' [-Werror,-Wformat]
> | aalg_desc->uinfo.auth.icv_fullbits / 8);
> -
> | net/ipv4/esp4.c:1114:5: error: format specifies type 'unsigned short'
> | but the argument has type 'int' [-Werror,-Wformat]
> | aalg_desc->uinfo.auth.icv_fullbits / 8);
>
> `aalg_desc->uinfo.auth.icv_fullbits` is a u16 but due to default
> argument promotion becomes an int.
>
> Variadic functions (printf-like) undergo default argument promotion.
> Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst specifically recommends using
> the promoted-to-type's format flag.
>
> As per C11 6.3.1.1:
> (https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1548.pdf) `If an int
> can represent all values of the original type ..., the value is
> converted to an int; otherwise, it is converted to an unsigned int.
> These are called the integer promotions.` Thus it makes sense to change
> %hu to %d not only to follow this standard but to suppress the warning
> as well.
>
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/378
> Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt <[email protected]>
> Suggested-by: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
> Suggested-by: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>
> Suggested-by: Nick Desaulniers <[email protected]>

Applied to the ipsec tree, thanks a lot!