p9_req_put need to be called when m->rreq->rc.sdata is NULL to avoid
possible refcount leak.
Fixes: 728356dedeff ("9p: Add refcount to p9_req_t")
Signed-off-by: Hangyu Hua <[email protected]>
---
Add p9_req_put in the "No recv fcall for tag..." error path according to Dominique's suggestion.
net/9p/trans_fd.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/net/9p/trans_fd.c b/net/9p/trans_fd.c
index 507974ce880c..090337f446d7 100644
--- a/net/9p/trans_fd.c
+++ b/net/9p/trans_fd.c
@@ -345,6 +345,7 @@ static void p9_read_work(struct work_struct *work)
p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_ERROR,
"No recv fcall for tag %d (req %p), disconnecting!\n",
m->rc.tag, m->rreq);
+ p9_req_put(m->rreq);
m->rreq = NULL;
err = -EIO;
goto error;
--
2.25.1
Hangyu Hua wrote on Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 06:44:38PM +0800:
> p9_req_put need to be called when m->rreq->rc.sdata is NULL to avoid
> possible refcount leak.
>
> Fixes: 728356dedeff ("9p: Add refcount to p9_req_t")
> Signed-off-by: Hangyu Hua <[email protected]>
I realize I didn't reply to this -- I've reworded the commit message a
bit and queued it for 5.20:
https://github.com/martinetd/linux/commit/4ac7573e1f9333073fa8d303acc941c9b7ab7f61
I'll have a look at the RDMA path you pointed at once I can find time to
make this adapter work, and will credit you for it as well
--
Dominique