The igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch() function had a lot of
KUNIT_EXPECT_* calls, all of which ended up allocating and initializing
various test assertion structures on the stack.
This behavior was producing -Wframe-larger-than warnings on PowerPC, i386,
and MIPS architectures, such as:
drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c: In function 'igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch':
drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c:271:1: error: the frame size of
3712 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes
So, the igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch() test case was split into three
smaller functions: one testing single plane formats, one testing multiple
planes formats, and the other testing tiled formats.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c
index 056cb8599d6d..28f2b8f88818 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_block_height(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, drm_format_info_block_height(info, -1));
}
-static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
+static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_single_plane(struct kunit *test)
{
const struct drm_format_info *info = NULL;
@@ -175,6 +175,11 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
(uint64_t)UINT_MAX * 4);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_format_info_min_pitch(info, 0, (UINT_MAX - 1)),
(uint64_t)(UINT_MAX - 1) * 4);
+}
+
+static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_multiple_planes(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ const struct drm_format_info *info = NULL;
/* Test 2 planes format */
info = drm_format_info(DRM_FORMAT_NV12);
@@ -249,6 +254,11 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
(uint64_t)(UINT_MAX - 1) / 2);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_format_info_min_pitch(info, 2, (UINT_MAX - 1) / 2),
(uint64_t)(UINT_MAX - 1) / 2);
+}
+
+static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_tiled_format(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ const struct drm_format_info *info = NULL;
/* Test tiled format */
info = drm_format_info(DRM_FORMAT_X0L2);
@@ -273,7 +283,9 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
static struct kunit_case drm_format_tests[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_block_width),
KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_block_height),
- KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch),
+ KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_single_plane),
+ KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_multiple_planes),
+ KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_tiled_format),
{ }
};
--
2.36.1
Hi all,
Friendly ping: is someone available to take this, please?
Best Regards,
- Maíra Canal
On 7/17/22 15:43, Maíra Canal wrote:
> The igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch() function had a lot of
> KUNIT_EXPECT_* calls, all of which ended up allocating and initializing
> various test assertion structures on the stack.
>
> This behavior was producing -Wframe-larger-than warnings on PowerPC, i386,
> and MIPS architectures, such as:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c: In function 'igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch':
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c:271:1: error: the frame size of
> 3712 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes
>
> So, the igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch() test case was split into three
> smaller functions: one testing single plane formats, one testing multiple
> planes formats, and the other testing tiled formats.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c
> index 056cb8599d6d..28f2b8f88818 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_block_height(struct kunit *test)
> KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, drm_format_info_block_height(info, -1));
> }
>
> -static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
> +static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_single_plane(struct kunit *test)
> {
> const struct drm_format_info *info = NULL;
>
> @@ -175,6 +175,11 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
> (uint64_t)UINT_MAX * 4);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_format_info_min_pitch(info, 0, (UINT_MAX - 1)),
> (uint64_t)(UINT_MAX - 1) * 4);
> +}
> +
> +static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_multiple_planes(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + const struct drm_format_info *info = NULL;
>
> /* Test 2 planes format */
> info = drm_format_info(DRM_FORMAT_NV12);
> @@ -249,6 +254,11 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
> (uint64_t)(UINT_MAX - 1) / 2);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_format_info_min_pitch(info, 2, (UINT_MAX - 1) / 2),
> (uint64_t)(UINT_MAX - 1) / 2);
> +}
> +
> +static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_tiled_format(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + const struct drm_format_info *info = NULL;
>
> /* Test tiled format */
> info = drm_format_info(DRM_FORMAT_X0L2);
> @@ -273,7 +283,9 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
> static struct kunit_case drm_format_tests[] = {
> KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_block_width),
> KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_block_height),
> - KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch),
> + KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_single_plane),
> + KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_multiple_planes),
> + KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_tiled_format),
> { }
> };
>
Às 15:43 de 17/07/22, Maíra Canal escreveu:
> The igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch() function had a lot of
> KUNIT_EXPECT_* calls, all of which ended up allocating and initializing
> various test assertion structures on the stack.
>
> This behavior was producing -Wframe-larger-than warnings on PowerPC, i386,
> and MIPS architectures, such as:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c: In function 'igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch':
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c:271:1: error: the frame size of
> 3712 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes
>
> So, the igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch() test case was split into three
> smaller functions: one testing single plane formats, one testing multiple
> planes formats, and the other testing tiled formats.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <[email protected]>
> ---
Reviewed-by: André Almeida <[email protected]>
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c
> index 056cb8599d6d..28f2b8f88818 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_block_height(struct kunit *test)
> KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, drm_format_info_block_height(info, -1));
> }
>
> -static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
> +static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_single_plane(struct kunit *test)
> {
> const struct drm_format_info *info = NULL;
>
> @@ -175,6 +175,11 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
> (uint64_t)UINT_MAX * 4);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_format_info_min_pitch(info, 0, (UINT_MAX - 1)),
> (uint64_t)(UINT_MAX - 1) * 4);
> +}
> +
> +static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_multiple_planes(struct kunit *test)
Minor nit: I think the wording is usually "multi-planar"
> +{
> + const struct drm_format_info *info = NULL;
>
> /* Test 2 planes format */
> info = drm_format_info(DRM_FORMAT_NV12);
> @@ -249,6 +254,11 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
> (uint64_t)(UINT_MAX - 1) / 2);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_format_info_min_pitch(info, 2, (UINT_MAX - 1) / 2),
> (uint64_t)(UINT_MAX - 1) / 2);
> +}
> +
> +static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_tiled_format(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + const struct drm_format_info *info = NULL;
>
> /* Test tiled format */
> info = drm_format_info(DRM_FORMAT_X0L2);
> @@ -273,7 +283,9 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
> static struct kunit_case drm_format_tests[] = {
> KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_block_width),
> KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_block_height),
> - KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch),
> + KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_single_plane),
> + KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_multiple_planes),
> + KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_tiled_format),
> { }
> };
>
On 07/17, Ma?ra Canal wrote:
> The igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch() function had a lot of
> KUNIT_EXPECT_* calls, all of which ended up allocating and initializing
> various test assertion structures on the stack.
>
> This behavior was producing -Wframe-larger-than warnings on PowerPC, i386,
> and MIPS architectures, such as:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c: In function 'igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch':
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c:271:1: error: the frame size of
> 3712 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes
>
> So, the igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch() test case was split into three
> smaller functions: one testing single plane formats, one testing multiple
> planes formats, and the other testing tiled formats.
>
Hi Ma?ra,
Could you add a Fixes tag to indicate the commit that introduces the
issue?
Thanks,
Melissa
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Ma?ra Canal <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c
> index 056cb8599d6d..28f2b8f88818 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_test.c
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_block_height(struct kunit *test)
> KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, drm_format_info_block_height(info, -1));
> }
>
> -static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
> +static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_single_plane(struct kunit *test)
> {
> const struct drm_format_info *info = NULL;
>
> @@ -175,6 +175,11 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
> (uint64_t)UINT_MAX * 4);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_format_info_min_pitch(info, 0, (UINT_MAX - 1)),
> (uint64_t)(UINT_MAX - 1) * 4);
> +}
> +
> +static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_multiple_planes(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + const struct drm_format_info *info = NULL;
>
> /* Test 2 planes format */
> info = drm_format_info(DRM_FORMAT_NV12);
> @@ -249,6 +254,11 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
> (uint64_t)(UINT_MAX - 1) / 2);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_format_info_min_pitch(info, 2, (UINT_MAX - 1) / 2),
> (uint64_t)(UINT_MAX - 1) / 2);
> +}
> +
> +static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_tiled_format(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + const struct drm_format_info *info = NULL;
>
> /* Test tiled format */
> info = drm_format_info(DRM_FORMAT_X0L2);
> @@ -273,7 +283,9 @@ static void igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch(struct kunit *test)
> static struct kunit_case drm_format_tests[] = {
> KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_block_width),
> KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_block_height),
> - KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch),
> + KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_single_plane),
> + KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_multiple_planes),
> + KUNIT_CASE(igt_check_drm_format_min_pitch_for_tiled_format),
> { }
> };
>
> --
> 2.36.1
>