2022-08-19 10:35:50

by Ionela Voinescu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v3] arm64: errata: add detection for AMEVCNTR01 incrementing incorrectly

The AMU counter AMEVCNTR01 (constant counter) should increment at the same
rate as the system counter. On affected Cortex-A510 cores, AMEVCNTR01
increments incorrectly giving a significantly higher output value. This
results in inaccurate task scheduler utilization tracking and incorrect
feedback on CPU frequency.

Work around this problem by returning 0 when reading the affected counter
in key locations that results in disabling all users of this counter from
using it either for frequency invariance or as FFH reference counter. This
effect is the same to firmware disabling affected counters.

Details on how the two features are affected by this erratum:

- AMU counters will not be used for frequency invariance for affected
CPUs and CPUs in the same cpufreq policy. AMUs can still be used for
frequency invariance for unaffected CPUs in the system. Although
unlikely, if no alternative method can be found to support frequency
invariance for affected CPUs (cpufreq based or solution based on
platform counters) frequency invariance will be disabled. Please check
the chapter on frequency invariance at
Documentation/scheduler/sched-capacity.rst for details of its effect.

- Given that FFH can be used to fetch either the core or constant counter
values, restrictions are lifted regarding any of these counters
returning a valid (!0) value. Therefore FFH is considered supported
if there is a least one CPU that support AMUs, independent of any
counters being disabled or affected by this erratum. Clarifying
comments are now added to the cpc_ffh_supported(), cpu_read_constcnt()
and cpu_read_corecnt() functions.

The above is achieved through adding a new erratum: ARM64_ERRATUM_2457168.

Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Cc: James Morse <[email protected]>
---

Hi,

This patch is based on the information in the A510 Errata Notice,
version 13.0 at [1] and applies on v6.0-rc1.

v2 -> v3:
- v2 resent at [3]
- Based on 6.0-rc1.
- Added (hopefully clarifying) comments to cpc_ffh_supported(),
cpu_read_constcnt() and and cpu_read_corecnt() regarding CPUs affected
by errata, that have counters disabled or that don't support AMUs.
I'm happy to change the wording or add more details if need be.

v2 RESEND: v2 rebased on 6.0-rc1
v1 -> v2:
- v1 at [2]
- Move detection of erratum in cpu_errata.c
- Limit checking for affected CPUs to the init phase for FIE (Frequency
Invariance Engine). For FFH we'll still check for affected CPUs at each
read of the constant counter, but reads happen less often (driven by
sysfs reads) compared to FIE (on the tick).

[1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/SDEN2397589/1300/?lang=en
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/

Thanks,
Ionela.

Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.rst | 2 ++
arch/arm64/Kconfig | 17 ++++++++++++++
arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 10 ++++++++
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 5 +++-
arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps | 1 +
6 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.rst b/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.rst
index 33b04db8408f..fda97b3fcf01 100644
--- a/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.rst
+++ b/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.rst
@@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ stable kernels.
| Allwinner | A64/R18 | UNKNOWN1 | SUN50I_ERRATUM_UNKNOWN1 |
+----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
+----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
+| ARM | Cortex-A510 | #2457168 | ARM64_ERRATUM_2457168 |
++----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
| ARM | Cortex-A510 | #2064142 | ARM64_ERRATUM_2064142 |
+----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
| ARM | Cortex-A510 | #2038923 | ARM64_ERRATUM_2038923 |
diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index 571cc234d0b3..9fb9fff08c94 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -917,6 +917,23 @@ config ARM64_ERRATUM_1902691

If unsure, say Y.

+config ARM64_ERRATUM_2457168
+ bool "Cortex-A510: 2457168: workaround for AMEVCNTR01 incrementing incorrectly"
+ depends on ARM64_AMU_EXTN
+ default y
+ help
+ This option adds the workaround for ARM Cortex-A510 erratum 2457168.
+
+ The AMU counter AMEVCNTR01 (constant counter) should increment at the same rate
+ as the system counter. On affected Cortex-A510 cores AMEVCNTR01 increments
+ incorrectly giving a significantly higher output value.
+
+ Work around this problem by returning 0 when reading the affected counter in
+ key locations that results in disabling all users of this counter. This effect
+ is the same to firmware disabling affected counters.
+
+ If unsure, say Y.
+
config CAVIUM_ERRATUM_22375
bool "Cavium erratum 22375, 24313"
default y
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
index 7e6289e709fc..810dd3c39882 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
@@ -654,6 +654,16 @@ const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_errata[] = {
ERRATA_MIDR_REV_RANGE(MIDR_CORTEX_A510, 0, 0, 2)
},
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_2457168
+ {
+ .desc = "ARM erratum 2457168",
+ .capability = ARM64_WORKAROUND_2457168,
+ .type = ARM64_CPUCAP_WEAK_LOCAL_CPU_FEATURE,
+
+ /* Cortex-A510 r0p0-r1p1 */
+ CAP_MIDR_RANGE(MIDR_CORTEX_A510, 0, 0, 1, 1)
+ },
+#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_2038923
{
.desc = "ARM erratum 2038923",
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 907401e4fffb..af4de817d712 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -1870,7 +1870,10 @@ static void cpu_amu_enable(struct arm64_cpu_capabilities const *cap)
pr_info("detected CPU%d: Activity Monitors Unit (AMU)\n",
smp_processor_id());
cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &amu_cpus);
- update_freq_counters_refs();
+
+ /* 0 reference values signal broken/disabled counters */
+ if (!this_cpu_has_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_2457168))
+ update_freq_counters_refs();
}
}

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
index 869ffc4d4484..ad2bfc794257 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
@@ -296,12 +296,25 @@ core_initcall(init_amu_fie);

static void cpu_read_corecnt(void *val)
{
+ /*
+ * A value of 0 can be returned if the current CPU does not support AMUs
+ * or if the counter is disabled for this CPU. A return value of 0 at
+ * counter read is properly handled as an error case by the users of the
+ * counter.
+ */
*(u64 *)val = read_corecnt();
}

static void cpu_read_constcnt(void *val)
{
- *(u64 *)val = read_constcnt();
+ /*
+ * Return 0 if the current CPU is affected by erratum 2457168. A value
+ * of 0 is also returned if the current CPU does not support AMUs or if
+ * the counter is disabled. A return value of 0 at counter read is
+ * properly handled as an error case by the users of the counter.
+ */
+ *(u64 *)val = this_cpu_has_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_2457168) ?
+ 0UL : read_constcnt();
}

static inline
@@ -328,7 +341,22 @@ int counters_read_on_cpu(int cpu, smp_call_func_t func, u64 *val)
*/
bool cpc_ffh_supported(void)
{
- return freq_counters_valid(get_cpu_with_amu_feat());
+ int cpu = get_cpu_with_amu_feat();
+
+ /*
+ * FFH is considered supported if there is at least one present CPU that
+ * supports AMUs. Using FFH to read core and reference counters for CPUs
+ * that do not support AMUs, have counters disabled or that are affected
+ * by errata, will result in a return value of 0.
+ *
+ * This is done to allow any enabled and valid counters to be read
+ * through FFH, knowing that potentially returning 0 as counter value is
+ * properly handled by the users of these counters.
+ */
+ if ((cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) || !cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_present_mask))
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
}

int cpc_read_ffh(int cpu, struct cpc_reg *reg, u64 *val)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
index 779653771507..63b2484ce6c3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
+++ b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ WORKAROUND_1902691
WORKAROUND_2038923
WORKAROUND_2064142
WORKAROUND_2077057
+WORKAROUND_2457168
WORKAROUND_TRBE_OVERWRITE_FILL_MODE
WORKAROUND_TSB_FLUSH_FAILURE
WORKAROUND_TRBE_WRITE_OUT_OF_RANGE
--
2.25.1


2022-08-23 15:38:52

by Will Deacon

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: errata: add detection for AMEVCNTR01 incrementing incorrectly

On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 11:30:50 +0100, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> The AMU counter AMEVCNTR01 (constant counter) should increment at the same
> rate as the system counter. On affected Cortex-A510 cores, AMEVCNTR01
> increments incorrectly giving a significantly higher output value. This
> results in inaccurate task scheduler utilization tracking and incorrect
> feedback on CPU frequency.
>
> Work around this problem by returning 0 when reading the affected counter
> in key locations that results in disabling all users of this counter from
> using it either for frequency invariance or as FFH reference counter. This
> effect is the same to firmware disabling affected counters.
>
> [...]

Applied to arm64 (for-next/fixes), thanks!

[1/1] arm64: errata: add detection for AMEVCNTR01 incrementing incorrectly
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/e89d120c4b72

Cheers,
--
Will

https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev