On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 10:27:17AM +0200, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> Hi Ming,
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 07:47:47AM +0000, Ming Qian wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/amphion/vpu_helpers.c
> > >> b/drivers/media/platform/amphion/vpu_helpers.c
> > >> index e9aeb3453dfc..019c77e84514 100644
> > >> --- a/drivers/media/platform/amphion/vpu_helpers.c
> > >> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/amphion/vpu_helpers.c
> > >> @@ -59,6 +59,36 @@ const struct vpu_format
> > >*vpu_helper_find_format(struct vpu_inst *inst, u32 type,
> > >> return NULL;
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> +const struct vpu_format *vpu_helper_find_sibling(struct vpu_inst
> > >> +*inst, u32 type, u32 pixelfmt) {
> > >> + const struct vpu_format *fmt;
> > >> + const struct vpu_format *sibling;
> > >> +
> > >> + fmt = vpu_helper_find_format(inst, type, pixelfmt);
> > >> + if (!fmt || !fmt->sibling)
> > >> + return NULL;
> > >> +
> > >> + sibling = vpu_helper_find_format(inst, type, fmt->sibling);
> > >> + if (!sibling || sibling->sibling != fmt->pixfmt ||
> > >> + sibling->comp_planes != fmt->comp_planes)
> > >> + return NULL;
> > >
> > >I think to preserve code style you need the following solutions on this if
> > >statement:
> > >
> > >if (!sibling || (sibling->sibling != fmt->pixfmt) ||
> > > (sibling->comp_planes != fmt->comp_planes))
> > > return NULL;
> > >
> > >I think I have suggested to you this solution on the v4. But never mind we
> > >need this :)
> > >
> > >Thanks
> > >
> >
> > Hi Tommaso,
> > The parentheses are unnecessary, the checkpatch.pl will report the following style problems if I add the parentheses:
> >
> > CHECK: Unnecessary parentheses around 'sibling->sibling != fmt->pixfmt'
> > #11: FILE: drivers/media/platform/amphion/vpu_helpers.c:72:
> > + if (!sibling || (sibling->sibling != fmt->pixfmt) ||
> > + (sibling->comp_planes != fmt->comp_planes))
> >
> > CHECK: Unnecessary parentheses around 'sibling->comp_planes != fmt->comp_planes'
> > #11: FILE: drivers/media/platform/amphion/vpu_helpers.c:72:
> > + if (!sibling || (sibling->sibling != fmt->pixfmt) ||
> > + (sibling->comp_planes != fmt->comp_planes))
> >
> > total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 2 checks, 10 lines checked
> >
> > NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
> > mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.
> >
> > 1.patch has style problems, please review.
> >
> > NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
> > them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
>
> Sorry, my bad. I don't check this using checkpatch.pl, but checking the
> others driver code, you are right. Thanks for clarify this.
>
> Then, Looks good to me.
>
> Regards,
> Tommaso
Forgot the tag:
Reviewed-by: Tommaso Merciai <[email protected]>
>
> --
> Tommaso Merciai
> Embedded Linux Engineer
> [email protected]
> __________________________________
>
> Amarula Solutions SRL
> Via Le Canevare 30, 31100 Treviso, Veneto, IT
> T. +39 042 243 5310
> [email protected]
> http://www.amarulasolutions.com
--
Tommaso Merciai
Embedded Linux Engineer
[email protected]
__________________________________
Amarula Solutions SRL
Via Le Canevare 30, 31100 Treviso, Veneto, IT
T. +39 042 243 5310
[email protected]
http://www.amarulasolutions.com