2022-08-29 22:13:27

by Prabhakar Mahadev Lad

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] dt-bindings: display: bridge: renesas,dw-hdmi: Fix 'unevaluatedProperties' warnings

With 'unevaluatedProperties' support implemented, there's a number of
warnings when running dtbs_check:

arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a774b1-hihope-rzg2n-rev2-ex-idk-1110wr.dtb: hdmi@fead0000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('resets' was unexpected)
From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/renesas,dw-hdmi.yaml

The main problem is that SoC DTSI's are including resets property, whereas
the renesas,dw-hdmi.yaml has 'unevaluatedProperties: false'. So just add
optional resets property to the binding.

Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <[email protected]>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/renesas,dw-hdmi.yaml | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/renesas,dw-hdmi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/renesas,dw-hdmi.yaml
index 0c9785c8db51..a7e44e249dd3 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/renesas,dw-hdmi.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/renesas,dw-hdmi.yaml
@@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ properties:
clock-names:
maxItems: 2

+ resets:
+ maxItems: 1
+
ports:
$ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/ports

--
2.25.1


2022-08-29 23:21:34

by Laurent Pinchart

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: display: bridge: renesas,dw-hdmi: Fix 'unevaluatedProperties' warnings

Hi Prabhakar,

Thank you for the patch.

On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 10:58:16PM +0100, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> With 'unevaluatedProperties' support implemented, there's a number of
> warnings when running dtbs_check:
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a774b1-hihope-rzg2n-rev2-ex-idk-1110wr.dtb: hdmi@fead0000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('resets' was unexpected)
> From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/renesas,dw-hdmi.yaml
>
> The main problem is that SoC DTSI's are including resets property, whereas
> the renesas,dw-hdmi.yaml has 'unevaluatedProperties: false'. So just add
> optional resets property to the binding.

Given that all the DT sources in the kernel specify the resets property,
how about making it mandatory ?

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <[email protected]>

> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/renesas,dw-hdmi.yaml | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/renesas,dw-hdmi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/renesas,dw-hdmi.yaml
> index 0c9785c8db51..a7e44e249dd3 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/renesas,dw-hdmi.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/renesas,dw-hdmi.yaml
> @@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ properties:
> clock-names:
> maxItems: 2
>
> + resets:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> ports:
> $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/ports
>

--
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

2022-08-30 09:46:44

by Prabhakar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: display: bridge: renesas,dw-hdmi: Fix 'unevaluatedProperties' warnings

Hi Laurent,

On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 12:08 AM Laurent Pinchart
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Prabhakar,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 10:58:16PM +0100, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> > With 'unevaluatedProperties' support implemented, there's a number of
> > warnings when running dtbs_check:
> >
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a774b1-hihope-rzg2n-rev2-ex-idk-1110wr.dtb: hdmi@fead0000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('resets' was unexpected)
> > From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/renesas,dw-hdmi.yaml
> >
> > The main problem is that SoC DTSI's are including resets property, whereas
> > the renesas,dw-hdmi.yaml has 'unevaluatedProperties: false'. So just add
> > optional resets property to the binding.
>
> Given that all the DT sources in the kernel specify the resets property,
> how about making it mandatory ?
>
Agreed, will do that and send a v2.

Cheers,
Prabhakar

2022-08-30 09:50:24

by Krzysztof Kozlowski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: display: bridge: renesas,dw-hdmi: Fix 'unevaluatedProperties' warnings

On 30/08/2022 00:58, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> With 'unevaluatedProperties' support implemented, there's a number of
> warnings when running dtbs_check:
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a774b1-hihope-rzg2n-rev2-ex-idk-1110wr.dtb: hdmi@fead0000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('resets' was unexpected)
> From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/renesas,dw-hdmi.yaml
>
> The main problem is that SoC DTSI's are including resets property, whereas
> the renesas,dw-hdmi.yaml has 'unevaluatedProperties: false'. So just add
> optional resets property to the binding.

This is not main problem. I already commented on two of your similar
patches, so same applies here. Please describe real problem.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

2022-08-30 10:13:39

by Prabhakar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: display: bridge: renesas,dw-hdmi: Fix 'unevaluatedProperties' warnings

Hi Krzysztof,

Thank you for the review.

On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 10:23 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 30/08/2022 00:58, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> > With 'unevaluatedProperties' support implemented, there's a number of
> > warnings when running dtbs_check:
> >
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a774b1-hihope-rzg2n-rev2-ex-idk-1110wr.dtb: hdmi@fead0000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('resets' was unexpected)
> > From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/renesas,dw-hdmi.yaml
> >
> > The main problem is that SoC DTSI's are including resets property, whereas
> > the renesas,dw-hdmi.yaml has 'unevaluatedProperties: false'. So just add
> > optional resets property to the binding.
>
> This is not main problem. I already commented on two of your similar
> patches, so same applies here. Please describe real problem.
>
Sure will do that and send a v2 (and also for the reset of the patches).

Cheers,
Prabhakar