This is the remaining part of the reset rework on the LAN966x targetting
the netdev tree.
The former series can be found at:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
Michael Walle (2):
dt-bindings: net: sparx5: don't require a reset line
net: lan966x: make reset optional
.../devicetree/bindings/net/microchip,sparx5-switch.yaml | 2 --
drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
2.30.2
Make the reset line optional. It turns out, there is no dedicated reset
for the switch. Instead, the reset which was used up until now, was kind
of a global reset. This is now handled elsewhere, thus don't require a
reset.
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/net/microchip,sparx5-switch.yaml | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/microchip,sparx5-switch.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/microchip,sparx5-switch.yaml
index 0807aa7a8f63..57ffeb8fc876 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/microchip,sparx5-switch.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/microchip,sparx5-switch.yaml
@@ -130,8 +130,6 @@ required:
- reg-names
- interrupts
- interrupt-names
- - resets
- - reset-names
- ethernet-ports
additionalProperties: false
--
2.30.2
There is no dedicated reset for just the switch core. The reset which
is used up until now, is more of a global reset, resetting almost the
whole SoC and cause spurious errors by doing so. Make it possible to
handle the reset elsewhere and make the reset optional.
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
index 2ad078608c45..e2c77f954a3d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
@@ -971,7 +971,8 @@ static int lan966x_reset_switch(struct lan966x *lan966x)
int val = 0;
int ret;
- switch_reset = devm_reset_control_get_shared(lan966x->dev, "switch");
+ switch_reset = devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared(lan966x->dev,
+ "switch");
if (IS_ERR(switch_reset))
return dev_err_probe(lan966x->dev, PTR_ERR(switch_reset),
"Could not obtain switch reset");
--
2.30.2
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master)
by David S. Miller <[email protected]>:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 13:18:53 +0200 you wrote:
> This is the remaining part of the reset rework on the LAN966x targetting
> the netdev tree.
>
> The former series can be found at:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
>
> Michael Walle (2):
> dt-bindings: net: sparx5: don't require a reset line
> net: lan966x: make reset optional
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next,1/2] dt-bindings: net: sparx5: don't require a reset line
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/baa6a9b59070
- [net-next,2/2] net: lan966x: make reset optional
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/f4c1f51cea4e
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html