Add support for the main clock bundle on the SM6115.
Signed-off-by: Iskren Chernev <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi
index 7496b3e0ff48..5af915e80017 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi
@@ -388,6 +388,17 @@ soc: soc {
#size-cells = <1>;
ranges = <0 0 0 0xffffffff>;
+ gcc: clock-controller@1400000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,gcc-sm6115", "syscon";
+ reg = <0x1400000 0x1f0000>;
+ reg-names = "cc_base";
+ clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC>, <&sleep_clk>;
+ clock-names = "bi_tcxo", "sleep_clk";
+ #clock-cells = <1>;
+ #reset-cells = <1>;
+ #power-domain-cells = <1>;
+ };
+
qfprom@1b40000 {
compatible = "qcom,qfprom";
reg = <0x1b40000 0x7000>;
--
2.37.2
On 01/09/2022 10:24, Iskren Chernev wrote:
> Add support for the main clock bundle on the SM6115.
>
> Signed-off-by: Iskren Chernev <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
This needs squashing, because one patchset per device node on first
submission does not make sense.
Please squash all your 1-7, 8-10 patches.
Best regards,
Krzysztof