2022-09-05 02:55:27

by Jiapeng Chong

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] block/blk-map: Remove set but unused variable 'added'

The variable added is not effectively used in the function, so delete
it.

block/blk-map.c:273:16: warning: variable 'added' set but not used.

Link: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=2049
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <[email protected]>
---
block/blk-map.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-map.c b/block/blk-map.c
index 2fbe298d3822..a06919822a73 100644
--- a/block/blk-map.c
+++ b/block/blk-map.c
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ static int bio_map_user_iov(struct request *rq, struct iov_iter *iter,
while (iov_iter_count(iter)) {
struct page **pages, *stack_pages[UIO_FASTIOV];
ssize_t bytes;
- size_t offs, added = 0;
+ size_t offs = 0;
int npages;

if (nr_vecs <= ARRAY_SIZE(stack_pages)) {
@@ -306,7 +306,6 @@ static int bio_map_user_iov(struct request *rq, struct iov_iter *iter,
break;
}

- added += n;
bytes -= n;
offs = 0;
}
--
2.20.1.7.g153144c


2022-09-05 05:08:28

by Damien Le Moal

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block/blk-map: Remove set but unused variable 'added'

On 9/5/22 11:25, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
> The variable added is not effectively used in the function, so delete
> it.
>
> block/blk-map.c:273:16: warning: variable 'added' set but not used.
>
> Link: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=2049
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <[email protected]>
> ---
> block/blk-map.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-map.c b/block/blk-map.c
> index 2fbe298d3822..a06919822a73 100644
> --- a/block/blk-map.c
> +++ b/block/blk-map.c
> @@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ static int bio_map_user_iov(struct request *rq, struct iov_iter *iter,
> while (iov_iter_count(iter)) {
> struct page **pages, *stack_pages[UIO_FASTIOV];
> ssize_t bytes;
> - size_t offs, added = 0;
> + size_t offs = 0;

offs is initialized with the call to iov_iter_get_pages_alloc2() so I do
not think it needs to be initialized to 0 here, unless you have a compiler
or sparse warning. If that is the case, this should be mentioned in the
commit message too.

> int npages;
>
> if (nr_vecs <= ARRAY_SIZE(stack_pages)) {
> @@ -306,7 +306,6 @@ static int bio_map_user_iov(struct request *rq, struct iov_iter *iter,
> break;
> }
>
> - added += n;
> bytes -= n;
> offs = 0;
> }

--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research