There's no need to check whether order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER again.
Minor readability improvement.
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <[email protected]>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 63ad25e86010..262e8972e019 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -5272,7 +5272,7 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
* so that we can identify them and convert them to something
* else.
*/
- WARN_ON_ONCE_GFP(order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER, gfp_mask);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE_GFP(costly_order, gfp_mask);
/*
* Help non-failing allocations by giving them access to memory
--
2.23.0
On 09.09.22 11:24, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> There's no need to check whether order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER again.
> Minor readability improvement.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <[email protected]>
> ---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 63ad25e86010..262e8972e019 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -5272,7 +5272,7 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> * so that we can identify them and convert them to something
> * else.
> */
> - WARN_ON_ONCE_GFP(order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER, gfp_mask);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE_GFP(costly_order, gfp_mask);
>
> /*
> * Help non-failing allocations by giving them access to memory
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
On 9/9/22 14:54, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> There's no need to check whether order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER again.
> Minor readability improvement.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <[email protected]>
> ---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 63ad25e86010..262e8972e019 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -5272,7 +5272,7 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> * so that we can identify them and convert them to something
> * else.
> */
> - WARN_ON_ONCE_GFP(order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER, gfp_mask);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE_GFP(costly_order, gfp_mask);
>
> /*
> * Help non-failing allocations by giving them access to memory
On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 05:24:49PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> There's no need to check whether order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER again.
> Minor readability improvement.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <[email protected]>
> ---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 63ad25e86010..262e8972e019 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -5272,7 +5272,7 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> * so that we can identify them and convert them to something
> * else.
> */
> - WARN_ON_ONCE_GFP(order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER, gfp_mask);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE_GFP(costly_order, gfp_mask);
>
> /*
> * Help non-failing allocations by giving them access to memory
> --
> 2.23.0
>
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs