2022-09-16 06:33:01

by CGEL

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH linux-next] ASoC: amd: acp: use devm_kcalloc() instead of devm_kzalloc()

From: ye xingchen <[email protected]>

Use 2-factor multiplication argument form devm_kcalloc() instead
of devm_kzalloc().

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <[email protected]>
---
sound/soc/amd/acp/acp-pci.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/amd/acp/acp-pci.c b/sound/soc/amd/acp/acp-pci.c
index ef2ce083521e..a0c84cd07fde 100644
--- a/sound/soc/amd/acp/acp-pci.c
+++ b/sound/soc/amd/acp/acp-pci.c
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static int acp_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pci, const struct pci_device_id *pci_id
goto unregister_dmic_dev;
}

- res = devm_kzalloc(&pci->dev, sizeof(struct resource) * num_res, GFP_KERNEL);
+ res = devm_kcalloc(&pci->dev, num_res, sizeof(struct resource), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!res) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto unregister_dmic_dev;
--
2.25.1


2022-09-19 23:59:12

by Mark Brown

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] ASoC: amd: acp: use devm_kcalloc() instead of devm_kzalloc()

On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 06:19:06 +0000, [email protected] wrote:
> From: ye xingchen <[email protected]>
>
> Use 2-factor multiplication argument form devm_kcalloc() instead
> of devm_kzalloc().
>
>

Applied to

broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: amd: acp: use devm_kcalloc() instead of devm_kzalloc()
commit: 8e34d743f97f151824a2dc0803695752de80bf7d

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark