From: ye xingchen <[email protected]>
Use 2-factor multiplication argument form devm_kcalloc() instead
of devm_kzalloc().
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <[email protected]>
---
sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_ssp_amp.c | 15 ++++++++-------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_ssp_amp.c b/sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_ssp_amp.c
index 4a762e002ac7..94d25aeb6e7c 100644
--- a/sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_ssp_amp.c
+++ b/sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_ssp_amp.c
@@ -210,10 +210,10 @@ static struct snd_soc_dai_link *sof_card_dai_links_create(struct device *dev,
struct snd_soc_dai_link *links;
int i, id = 0;
- links = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct snd_soc_dai_link) *
- sof_ssp_amp_card.num_links, GFP_KERNEL);
- cpus = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct snd_soc_dai_link_component) *
- sof_ssp_amp_card.num_links, GFP_KERNEL);
+ links = devm_kcalloc(dev, sof_ssp_amp_card.num_links,
+ sizeof(struct snd_soc_dai_link), GFP_KERNEL);
+ cpus = devm_kcalloc(dev, sof_ssp_amp_card.num_links,
+ sizeof(struct snd_soc_dai_link_component), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!links || !cpus)
return NULL;
@@ -306,9 +306,10 @@ static struct snd_soc_dai_link *sof_card_dai_links_create(struct device *dev,
if (sof_ssp_amp_quirk & SOF_HDMI_PLAYBACK_PRESENT) {
/* HDMI */
if (hdmi_num > 0) {
- idisp_components = devm_kzalloc(dev,
- sizeof(struct snd_soc_dai_link_component) *
- hdmi_num, GFP_KERNEL);
+ idisp_components = devm_kcalloc(dev,
+ hdmi_num,
+ sizeof(struct snd_soc_dai_link_component),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
if (!idisp_components)
goto devm_err;
}
--
2.25.1
On 9/16/22 08:25, [email protected] wrote:
> From: ye xingchen <[email protected]>
>
> Use 2-factor multiplication argument form devm_kcalloc() instead
> of devm_kzalloc().
>
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]>
> ---
> sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_ssp_amp.c | 15 ++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_ssp_amp.c b/sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_ssp_amp.c
> index 4a762e002ac7..94d25aeb6e7c 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_ssp_amp.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_ssp_amp.c
> @@ -210,10 +210,10 @@ static struct snd_soc_dai_link *sof_card_dai_links_create(struct device *dev,
> struct snd_soc_dai_link *links;
> int i, id = 0;
>
> - links = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct snd_soc_dai_link) *
> - sof_ssp_amp_card.num_links, GFP_KERNEL);
> - cpus = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct snd_soc_dai_link_component) *
> - sof_ssp_amp_card.num_links, GFP_KERNEL);
> + links = devm_kcalloc(dev, sof_ssp_amp_card.num_links,
> + sizeof(struct snd_soc_dai_link), GFP_KERNEL);
> + cpus = devm_kcalloc(dev, sof_ssp_amp_card.num_links,
> + sizeof(struct snd_soc_dai_link_component), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!links || !cpus)
> return NULL;
>
> @@ -306,9 +306,10 @@ static struct snd_soc_dai_link *sof_card_dai_links_create(struct device *dev,
> if (sof_ssp_amp_quirk & SOF_HDMI_PLAYBACK_PRESENT) {
> /* HDMI */
> if (hdmi_num > 0) {
> - idisp_components = devm_kzalloc(dev,
> - sizeof(struct snd_soc_dai_link_component) *
> - hdmi_num, GFP_KERNEL);
> + idisp_components = devm_kcalloc(dev,
> + hdmi_num,
> + sizeof(struct snd_soc_dai_link_component),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!idisp_components)
> goto devm_err;
> }
On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 06:25:49 +0000, [email protected] wrote:
> From: ye xingchen <[email protected]>
>
> Use 2-factor multiplication argument form devm_kcalloc() instead
> of devm_kzalloc().
>
>
Applied to
broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: Intel: sof_ssp_amp: use devm_kcalloc() instead of devm_kzalloc()
commit: 09dea5acbe352481beed7d7114295171f5073dff
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark