2022-09-21 09:19:15

by Naoya Horiguchi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/4] mm,hwpoison,hugetlb,memory_hotplug: hotremove memory section with hwpoisoned hugepage

From: Naoya Horiguchi <[email protected]>

HWPoisoned page is not supposed to be accessed once marked, but currently
such accesses can happen during memory hotremove because do_migrate_range()
can be called before dissolve_free_huge_pages() is called.

Clear HPageMigratable for hwpoisoned hugepages to prevent them from being
migrated. This should be done in hugetlb_lock to avoid race against
isolate_hugetlb().

get_hwpoison_huge_page() needs to have a flag to show it's called from
unpoison to take refcount of hwpoisoned hugepages, so add it.

Reported-by: Miaohe Lin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <[email protected]>
---
ChangeLog v2 -> v3
- move to the approach of clearing HPageMigratable instead of shifting
dissolve_free_huge_pages.
---
include/linux/hugetlb.h | 4 ++--
mm/hugetlb.c | 4 ++--
mm/memory-failure.c | 12 ++++++++++--
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
index cfe15b32e2d4..18229402c6d7 100644
--- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
+++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ bool hugetlb_reserve_pages(struct inode *inode, long from, long to,
long hugetlb_unreserve_pages(struct inode *inode, long start, long end,
long freed);
int isolate_hugetlb(struct page *page, struct list_head *list);
-int get_hwpoison_huge_page(struct page *page, bool *hugetlb);
+int get_hwpoison_huge_page(struct page *page, bool *hugetlb, bool unpoison);
int get_huge_page_for_hwpoison(unsigned long pfn, int flags);
void putback_active_hugepage(struct page *page);
void move_hugetlb_state(struct page *oldpage, struct page *newpage, int reason);
@@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ static inline int isolate_hugetlb(struct page *page, struct list_head *list)
return -EBUSY;
}

-static inline int get_hwpoison_huge_page(struct page *page, bool *hugetlb)
+static inline int get_hwpoison_huge_page(struct page *page, bool *hugetlb, bool unpoison)
{
return 0;
}
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 8bcaf66defc5..d3b83c570b56 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -7257,7 +7257,7 @@ int isolate_hugetlb(struct page *page, struct list_head *list)
return ret;
}

-int get_hwpoison_huge_page(struct page *page, bool *hugetlb)
+int get_hwpoison_huge_page(struct page *page, bool *hugetlb, bool unpoison)
{
int ret = 0;

@@ -7267,7 +7267,7 @@ int get_hwpoison_huge_page(struct page *page, bool *hugetlb)
*hugetlb = true;
if (HPageFreed(page))
ret = 0;
- else if (HPageMigratable(page))
+ else if (HPageMigratable(page) || unpoison)
ret = get_page_unless_zero(page);
else
ret = -EBUSY;
diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index 145bb561ddb3..5942e1c0407e 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -1244,7 +1244,7 @@ static int __get_hwpoison_page(struct page *page, unsigned long flags)
int ret = 0;
bool hugetlb = false;

- ret = get_hwpoison_huge_page(head, &hugetlb);
+ ret = get_hwpoison_huge_page(head, &hugetlb, false);
if (hugetlb)
return ret;

@@ -1334,7 +1334,7 @@ static int __get_unpoison_page(struct page *page)
int ret = 0;
bool hugetlb = false;

- ret = get_hwpoison_huge_page(head, &hugetlb);
+ ret = get_hwpoison_huge_page(head, &hugetlb, true);
if (hugetlb)
return ret;

@@ -1815,6 +1815,13 @@ int __get_huge_page_for_hwpoison(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
goto out;
}

+ /*
+ * Clearing HPageMigratable for hwpoisoned hugepages to prevent them
+ * from being migrated by memory hotremove.
+ */
+ if (count_increased)
+ ClearHPageMigratable(head);
+
return ret;
out:
if (count_increased)
@@ -1862,6 +1869,7 @@ static int try_memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags, int *hugetlb

if (hwpoison_filter(p)) {
hugetlb_clear_page_hwpoison(head);
+ SetHPageMigratable(head);
unlock_page(head);
if (res == 1)
put_page(head);
--
2.25.1


2022-09-28 01:52:44

by Naoya Horiguchi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] mm,hwpoison,hugetlb,memory_hotplug: hotremove memory section with hwpoisoned hugepage

On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 07:43:16PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> On 2022/9/21 17:13, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> > From: Naoya Horiguchi <[email protected]>
> >
> > HWPoisoned page is not supposed to be accessed once marked, but currently
> > such accesses can happen during memory hotremove because do_migrate_range()
> > can be called before dissolve_free_huge_pages() is called.
> >
> > Clear HPageMigratable for hwpoisoned hugepages to prevent them from being
> > migrated. This should be done in hugetlb_lock to avoid race against
> > isolate_hugetlb().
> >
> > get_hwpoison_huge_page() needs to have a flag to show it's called from
> > unpoison to take refcount of hwpoisoned hugepages, so add it.
> >
> > Reported-by: Miaohe Lin <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <[email protected]>
>
> Thanks for your work, Naoya. Maybe something to improve below.
>
> > ---
> > ChangeLog v2 -> v3
> > - move to the approach of clearing HPageMigratable instead of shifting
> > dissolve_free_huge_pages.
> > ---
> > include/linux/hugetlb.h | 4 ++--
> > mm/hugetlb.c | 4 ++--
> > mm/memory-failure.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> > 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
>
> <snip>
>
> > @@ -7267,7 +7267,7 @@ int get_hwpoison_huge_page(struct page *page, bool *hugetlb)
> > *hugetlb = true;
> > if (HPageFreed(page))
> > ret = 0;
> > - else if (HPageMigratable(page))
> > + else if (HPageMigratable(page) || unpoison)
>
> Is unpoison_memory() expected to restore the HPageMigratable flag as well ?

No it isn't. When unpoison_memory() unpoisons a hugepage, the hugepage
is sent back to free hugepage pool, so I think that there's no need to
restore HPageMigratable for it.

>
> > ret = get_page_unless_zero(page);
> > else
> > ret = -EBUSY;
> > diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> > index 145bb561ddb3..5942e1c0407e 100644
> > --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> > +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> > @@ -1244,7 +1244,7 @@ static int __get_hwpoison_page(struct page *page, unsigned long flags)
> > int ret = 0;
> > bool hugetlb = false;
> >
> > - ret = get_hwpoison_huge_page(head, &hugetlb);
> > + ret = get_hwpoison_huge_page(head, &hugetlb, false);
> > if (hugetlb)
> > return ret;
> >
> > @@ -1334,7 +1334,7 @@ static int __get_unpoison_page(struct page *page)
> > int ret = 0;
> > bool hugetlb = false;
> >
> > - ret = get_hwpoison_huge_page(head, &hugetlb);
> > + ret = get_hwpoison_huge_page(head, &hugetlb, true);
> > if (hugetlb)
> > return ret;
> >
> > @@ -1815,6 +1815,13 @@ int __get_huge_page_for_hwpoison(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Clearing HPageMigratable for hwpoisoned hugepages to prevent them
> > + * from being migrated by memory hotremove.
> > + */
> > + if (count_increased)
> > + ClearHPageMigratable(head);
>
> I believe this can prevent hwpoisoned hugepages from being migrated though there still be some windows.

I'm not sure of "still racy" part, so could you elaborate it?
Main scenario this patch tries to handle is like below:

CPU 0 CPU 1
get_huge_page_for_hwpoison
// take hugetlb_lock
__get_huge_page_for_hwpoison
scan_movable_pages
if HPageMigratable
goto found
do_migrate_range
if HPageMigratable
get_page_unless_zero
hugetlb_set_page_hwpoison
ClearHPageMigratable
// release hugetlb_lock
isolate_hugetlb
// take hugetlb_lock
if !HPageMigratable
// fails to isolate the hwpoisoned hugetlb.

Maybe the following could be possible.

CPU 0 CPU 1
scan_movable_pages
if HPageMigratable
goto found
do_migrate_range
isolate_hugetlb
// the hugetlb is isolated,
// but it's not hwpoisoned yet.
get_huge_page_for_hwpoison
// take hugetlb_lock
__get_huge_page_for_hwpoison
if HPageMigratable
get_page_unless_zero
hugetlb_set_page_hwpoison
ClearHPageMigratable
// release hugetlb_lock

In this case, the hugepage is maybe broken but not marked as hwpoison yet,
so it's not detectable.

>
> > +
> > return ret;
> > out:
> > if (count_increased)
> > @@ -1862,6 +1869,7 @@ static int try_memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags, int *hugetlb
> >
> > if (hwpoison_filter(p)) {
> > hugetlb_clear_page_hwpoison(head);
> > + SetHPageMigratable(head);
>
> Would we set HPageMigratable flag for free hugetlb pages here? IIUC, they're not expected to have this flag set.

Thank you, you're right. This should be done in "if (res == 1)" block.
(hwpoison_filter often bothers me ...)

>
> Thanks,
> Miaohe Lin

Thank you very much!
- Naoya Horiguchi

Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] mm,hwpoison,hugetlb,memory_hotplug: hotremove memory section with hwpoisoned hugepage

On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 05:32:12PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> On 2022/9/28 9:26, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> >>> @@ -1815,6 +1815,13 @@ int __get_huge_page_for_hwpoison(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
...
> >>> @@ -1862,6 +1869,7 @@ static int try_memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags, int *hugetlb
> >>>
> >>> if (hwpoison_filter(p)) {
> >>> hugetlb_clear_page_hwpoison(head);
> >>> + SetHPageMigratable(head);
> >>
> >> Would we set HPageMigratable flag for free hugetlb pages here? IIUC, they're not expected to have this flag set.
> >
> > Thank you, you're right. This should be done in "if (res == 1)" block.
>
> If res == 1, it means hugetlb page refcnt is incremented. But it seems this does not necessarily mean
> HPageMigratable is cleared by __get_huge_page_for_hwpoison() if the hugetlb page is already isolated.
> If so, we might set HPageMigratable flag back for already isolated hugetlb pages?

# sorry for my late reply, I was busy with personal matters these days...

Yes, that could happen (and also in the case where MF_COUNT_INCREASED is
set). We need store whether HPageMigratable flag is cleared or not in
__get_huge_page_for_hwpoison(). I'll add a parameter to
__get_huge_page_for_hwpoison() to return the flag change to the caller.
But I also think that there're a few internal states during error handling,
so it might be good to add some structure like "struct hwpoison_control"
to save such internal states over related functions (not in this series).

Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi