Sas address comparison is widely used in libsas. However they are all
opencoded and to avoid the line spill over 80 columns, are mostly split
into multi-lines. Introduce some helpers to prepare some refactor.
Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <[email protected]>
---
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_internal.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_internal.h b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_internal.h
index 8d0ad3abc7b5..3384429b7eb0 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_internal.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_internal.h
@@ -111,6 +111,23 @@ static inline void sas_smp_host_handler(struct bsg_job *job,
}
#endif
+static inline bool sas_phy_match_dev_addr(struct domain_device *dev,
+ struct ex_phy *phy)
+{
+ return SAS_ADDR(dev->sas_addr) == SAS_ADDR(phy->attached_sas_addr);
+}
+
+static inline bool sas_phy_match_port_addr(struct asd_sas_port *port,
+ struct ex_phy *phy)
+{
+ return SAS_ADDR(port->sas_addr) == SAS_ADDR(phy->attached_sas_addr);
+}
+
+static inline bool sas_phy_addr_match(struct ex_phy *p1, struct ex_phy *p2)
+{
+ return SAS_ADDR(p1->attached_sas_addr) == SAS_ADDR(p2->attached_sas_addr);
+}
+
static inline void sas_fail_probe(struct domain_device *dev, const char *func, int err)
{
pr_warn("%s: for %s device %016llx returned %d\n",
--
2.31.1
On 27/09/2022 04:25, Jason Yan wrote:
> Sas address comparison is widely used in libsas. However they are all
> opencoded and to avoid the line spill over 80 columns, are mostly split
> into multi-lines. Introduce some helpers to prepare some refactor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: John Garry <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_internal.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_internal.h b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_internal.h
> index 8d0ad3abc7b5..3384429b7eb0 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_internal.h
> @@ -111,6 +111,23 @@ static inline void sas_smp_host_handler(struct bsg_job *job,
> }
> #endif
>
> +static inline bool sas_phy_match_dev_addr(struct domain_device *dev,
> + struct ex_phy *phy)
> +{
> + return SAS_ADDR(dev->sas_addr) == SAS_ADDR(phy->attached_sas_addr);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool sas_phy_match_port_addr(struct asd_sas_port *port,
> + struct ex_phy *phy)
> +{
> + return SAS_ADDR(port->sas_addr) == SAS_ADDR(phy->attached_sas_addr);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool sas_phy_addr_match(struct ex_phy *p1, struct ex_phy *p2)
> +{
> + return SAS_ADDR(p1->attached_sas_addr) == SAS_ADDR(p2->attached_sas_addr);
> +}
> +
note: I did think that we could use a macro as a generic matching API, like:
#define sas_phy_match_addr_common(x, ex_phy) \
({ typeof(x) __dummy; \
if (__builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(__dummy), struct asd_sas_port))\
sas_phy_match_port_addr(x, ex_phy);\
if (__builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(__dummy), struct domain_device))\
sas_phy_match_dev_addr(x, ex_phy);\
0; \
})
But I couldn't get it to work after 60 minutes of messing ... indeed,
that latest code doesn't even compile..
Thanks,
John
> static inline void sas_fail_probe(struct domain_device *dev, const char *func, int err)
> {
> pr_warn("%s: for %s device %016llx returned %d\n",